Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Theonomy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Christian form of government in which society is ruled by divine law
This article is about biblical law within Christian reconstructionism. For the Christian theo-political movement, seeChristian reconstructionism. For the meta-ethical theory, seedivine command theory.
This articlemay rely excessively on sourcestoo closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from beingverifiable andneutral. Please helpimprove it by replacing them with more appropriatecitations toreliable, independent sources.(August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Part of thePolitics series
Basic forms ofgovernment
List of forms ·List of countries
iconPolitics portal

Theonomy (fromGreektheos "God" andnomos "law") is a hypotheticalChristian form of government in whichdivine law governs societies.[1] Theonomists hold that societies should observe divine law, particularly theOld Testament’s judicial laws.[2] The movement’s chief architects areGary North,Greg Bahnsen, andR.J. Rushdoony.[3]

Theonomy presumes biblical Israel’sOld Covenant judicial laws have not beenabrogated, and therefore all civil governments must enforce them (including the specific penalties). Theonomy holds that all civil governments must refrain from coercion if Scripture has not prescribed their intervention (the "regulative principle of the state").[4][5][6]

Theonomy is distinct from the "theonomous ethics" proposed byPaul Tillich.[3]

Origin

[edit]

Thomas Aquinas held, "if a sovereign were to order these judicial precepts to be observed in his kingdom, he would not sin."[7] Some have mistakenly referred to that as "General Equity Theonomy"[8] but it is in fact distinct from theonomy insofar as Aquinas believed the specifics of the Old Testament judicial laws were no longer binding. He instead taught that the judicial precepts contained varying degrees of universal principles of justice that reflectednatural law.[9]

InChristian reconstructionism, theonomy is the idea that God provides the basis of both personal and socialethics in theBible. Theonomic ethics asserts that the Bible has been given as the abiding standard for all human authority (individual, family, church, and civil) and thatbiblical law must be incorporated into a Christian theory of biblical ethics'

Theonomic ethics, to put it simply, represents a commitment to the necessity, sufficiency, and unity of Scripture. For an adequate and genuinely Christian ethic, we must have God's word, only God's word, and all of God's word. Nearly every critic of theonomic ethics will be found denying, in some way, one or more of these premises.

— The Theonomic Antithesis to Other Law-Attitudes[10]

Critics[who?] see theonomy as a significant form ofdominion theology, which they define as atheocracy. Theonomy posits that the biblical law is applicable to civil law, and theonomists propose biblical law as the standard by which laws may be measured and to which they ought to be conformed.

Goals

[edit]

Various theonomic authors have stated such goals as "the universal development of Biblical theocratic republics,"[11]: 223–335  exclusion of non-Christians from voting and citizenship,[12]: 87  and the application of Biblical law by the state.[13]: 346–47  Under such a system of biblical law, homosexual acts,[14]: 212  adultery, witchcraft, and blasphemy[15]: 118  would be punishable by death. Propagation of idolatry or "false religions" would be illegal[16] and could also be punished by the death penalty.[17][18]

More recent theonomic writers such as Joel McDurmon, former President ofAmerican Vision, have moved away from this position, stating that these death penalties are no longer binding in the new covenant.[19] Former pastor and theonomy critic, JD Hall, who debated McDurmon in 2015,[20] has argued that abandoning Mosaic penologies such as the death penalty means that McDurmon and others who hold similar positions cannot be said to hold to theonomy in any meaningful way.[21]

According to the theonomistGreg Bahnsen, the laws of God are the standard which Christian voters and officials ought to pursue. The civil law given to the nation of Israel, it is stated, is continuously binding, although apart from what he considers to be surrounding cultural connotations specific to this nation itself.[13]

Relation to Reformed theology

[edit]

Some in modernReformed churches criticize any relationship between the historical Reformed faith and theonomy,[22] but otherCalvinists affirm that theonomy is consistent with the historic Reformed confessions.[23]

See also

[edit]

Related topics in Christianity:

Related topics in philosophy and other religions:

References

[edit]
  1. ^Jones, David W. (1 November 2013).An Introduction to Biblical Ethics. B&H Publishing Group. p. 209.ISBN 9781433680779.
  2. ^English, Adam C. (2003). "Christian Reconstruction after Y2K".New Religious Movements and Religious Liberty in America. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press. pp. 113–114.Theonomy – A system of government characterized by being governed by divine law.
  3. ^abNeuhaus, Richard John (May 1990)."Why Wait for the Kingdom? The Theonomist Temptation".First Things. Retrieved8 August 2013.
  4. ^Bahnsen, Greg (April 1994)."What Is "Theonomy"? PE180 New Horizons". Archived fromthe original on 2020-11-12.
  5. ^Bahnsen, Greg L. (1991).No other standard : theonomy and its critics(PDF). Tyler, Tex.: Institute for Christian Economics. pp. 19–29.ISBN 0-930464-56-7.OCLC 23690584.
  6. ^Schwertley, Brian."A Critique of a Critique of Theonomy: An Analysis of Matthew Winzer's Misrepresentations of Theonomy and the Confession of Faith"(PDF). p. 2.
  7. ^Summa Theologica, I-II, q. 104, a. 3
  8. ^Clausen, Mark A., Professor of History,Cedarville University "Theonomy in the Middle Ages". Paper presented at the 2005 annual meeting of theAmerican Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC.
  9. ^"The General Equity of the Judicial Law".Reformed Books Online. 2016-07-16. Retrieved2021-04-09.
  10. ^Bahnsen, Greg."The Theonomic Antithesis to Other Law-Attitudes". Covenant Media Foundation. Retrieved2008-11-27.
  11. ^Chilton, David (1984).Paradise Restored: A Biblical Theology of Dominion. Dominion Press.ISBN 0-930462-52-1. RetrievedMarch 26, 2021.
  12. ^North, Gary (1989).Political Polytheism. Institute for Christian Economics.ISBN 0-930464-32-X. RetrievedMarch 26, 2021.
  13. ^abBahnsen, Greg (1985).By This Standard: The Authority Of God's Law Today. Institute for Christian Economics.ISBN 0-930464-06-0. RetrievedMarch 26, 2021.
  14. ^DeMar, Gary (1987).Ruler of the Nations. Dominion Press.ISBN 978-0-93046219-2. RetrievedMarch 26, 2021.
  15. ^North, Gary (1988).Unconditional Surrender: God's Program for Victory. Institute for Christian Economics.ISBN 0-930464-12-5.
  16. ^"An Interview with Greg L. Bahnsen". Archived fromthe original on 2020-05-14. Retrieved2007-12-12.
  17. ^Rushdoony, R.J., 1973,The Institutes of Biblical Law, Nutley, NJ: Craig Press, pp. 38–39.
  18. ^Schwertley, Brian M.,"Political Polytheism"Archived 2013-05-15 at theWayback Machine
  19. ^Joel McDurmon,The Bounds of Love (2016).
  20. ^The Theonomy Debate | Joel McDurmon vs. Jordan Hall
  21. ^Hall, J.D.,"On Joel McDurmon’s Abandonment of Theonomy"
  22. ^See, for instance,Theonomy: A Reformed Critique published by the faculty ofWestminster Theological Seminary andWestminster Seminary California. Also"The Westminster Confession of Faith: A Theonomic Document?" byLigon Duncan.
  23. ^SeeTheonomic Ethics and the Westminster Confession byKenneth Gentry,The New Puritanism: A Preliminary Assessment of Christian Reconstruction by Robert Bowman, Jr., Theonomy and the Westminster Confession by Martin Foulner,The Theonomic Precedent in the Theology of John Calvin by Christopher Strevel, andCalvinism and the Judicial Law of Moses by James Jordan, andThe Theonomic Thesis in Confessional and Historical Perspective by Greg Bahnsen.Biblical Ethics and the Westminster Standards by Dr. W. Gary Crampton

Further reading

[edit]
This "Further reading" sectionmay need cleanup. Please read theediting guide and help improve the section.(March 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Primary sources by theonomists
Secondary sources and criticisms

External links

[edit]
Beliefs
People
Critics
Other
General concepts
Buddhism and politics
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Theonomy&oldid=1253651481"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp