This articlemay rely excessively on sourcestoo closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from beingverifiable andneutral. Please helpimprove it by replacing them with more appropriatecitations toreliable, independent sources.(August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Part of thePolitics series | ||||||||
Basic forms ofgovernment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
List of forms ·List of countries | ||||||||
Source of power | ||||||||
Power ideology
| ||||||||
![]() | ||||||||
Theonomy (fromGreektheos "God" andnomos "law") is a hypotheticalChristian form of government in whichdivine law governs societies.[1] Theonomists hold that societies should observe divine law, particularly theOld Testament’s judicial laws.[2] The movement’s chief architects areGary North,Greg Bahnsen, andR.J. Rushdoony.[3]
Theonomy presumes biblical Israel’sOld Covenant judicial laws have not beenabrogated, and therefore all civil governments must enforce them (including the specific penalties). Theonomy holds that all civil governments must refrain from coercion if Scripture has not prescribed their intervention (the "regulative principle of the state").[4][5][6]
Theonomy is distinct from the "theonomous ethics" proposed byPaul Tillich.[3]
Thomas Aquinas held, "if a sovereign were to order these judicial precepts to be observed in his kingdom, he would not sin."[7] Some have mistakenly referred to that as "General Equity Theonomy"[8] but it is in fact distinct from theonomy insofar as Aquinas believed the specifics of the Old Testament judicial laws were no longer binding. He instead taught that the judicial precepts contained varying degrees of universal principles of justice that reflectednatural law.[9]
InChristian reconstructionism, theonomy is the idea that God provides the basis of both personal and socialethics in theBible. Theonomic ethics asserts that the Bible has been given as the abiding standard for all human authority (individual, family, church, and civil) and thatbiblical law must be incorporated into a Christian theory of biblical ethics'
Theonomic ethics, to put it simply, represents a commitment to the necessity, sufficiency, and unity of Scripture. For an adequate and genuinely Christian ethic, we must have God's word, only God's word, and all of God's word. Nearly every critic of theonomic ethics will be found denying, in some way, one or more of these premises.
— The Theonomic Antithesis to Other Law-Attitudes[10]
Critics[who?] see theonomy as a significant form ofdominion theology, which they define as atheocracy. Theonomy posits that the biblical law is applicable to civil law, and theonomists propose biblical law as the standard by which laws may be measured and to which they ought to be conformed.
Various theonomic authors have stated such goals as "the universal development of Biblical theocratic republics,"[11]: 223–335 exclusion of non-Christians from voting and citizenship,[12]: 87 and the application of Biblical law by the state.[13]: 346–47 Under such a system of biblical law, homosexual acts,[14]: 212 adultery, witchcraft, and blasphemy[15]: 118 would be punishable by death. Propagation of idolatry or "false religions" would be illegal[16] and could also be punished by the death penalty.[17][18]
More recent theonomic writers such as Joel McDurmon, former President ofAmerican Vision, have moved away from this position, stating that these death penalties are no longer binding in the new covenant.[19] Former pastor and theonomy critic, JD Hall, who debated McDurmon in 2015,[20] has argued that abandoning Mosaic penologies such as the death penalty means that McDurmon and others who hold similar positions cannot be said to hold to theonomy in any meaningful way.[21]
According to the theonomistGreg Bahnsen, the laws of God are the standard which Christian voters and officials ought to pursue. The civil law given to the nation of Israel, it is stated, is continuously binding, although apart from what he considers to be surrounding cultural connotations specific to this nation itself.[13]
Some in modernReformed churches criticize any relationship between the historical Reformed faith and theonomy,[22] but otherCalvinists affirm that theonomy is consistent with the historic Reformed confessions.[23]
Related topics in Christianity:
Related topics in philosophy and other religions:
Theonomy – A system of government characterized by being governed by divine law.
![]() | This "Further reading" sectionmay need cleanup. Please read theediting guide and help improve the section.(March 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |