| The Taking of Pelham 123 | |
|---|---|
.jpg) Theatrical release poster | |
| Directed by | Tony Scott |
| Screenplay by | Brian Helgeland |
| Based on | The Taking of Pelham One Two Three 1973 novel byJohn Godey |
| Produced by |
|
| Starring | |
| Cinematography | Tobias A. Schliessler |
| Edited by | Chris Lebenzon |
| Music by | Harry Gregson-Williams |
Production companies | |
| Distributed by | Sony Pictures Releasing |
Release date |
|
Running time | 106 minutes |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Budget | $100–110 million[1][2] |
| Box office | $150.2 million[2] |
The Taking of Pelham 123 is a 2009 Americanactionthriller film[2] directed byTony Scott from a screenplay byBrian Helgeland. It is the thirdfilm adaptation of theJohn Godey novelof the same name (following the1974 theatrical film and1998 television film). The film is about atrain dispatcher (Denzel Washington), who is pressed into the role of negotiator after a criminal (John Travolta) hijacks a subway car of passengers.[3] The film was released on June 12, 2009. It grossed $150 million against a production budget of about $100 million and received mixed reviews from critics.
A man calling himself Ryder and his accomplices – Bashkin, Emri, and formertrain operator Phil Ramos – hijack Pelham 123, aNew York City Subway6 train, at77th Street. Uncoupling the front car of the train below51st Street, they take the passengers hostage.Metropolitan Transportation Authority employee Walter Garber, working the Rail Control Center as a train dispatcher, receives a call from Ryder, demanding $10 million in cash to be paid within 60 minutes. Ryder warns that every minute he waits past the deadline, he will kill a hostage.
Bashkin kills an intervening plainclothesNew York City Transit Police officer, and all the passengers not in the front car, except the motorman, are released. Garber reluctantly negotiates with Ryder as Ramos and Emri set up Internet access in the tunnel. On his laptop, Ryder watches theDow Jones Industrial Average plunge nearly 1,000 points in response to the hijacking. A hostage's laptop also connects to the Internet, and itswebcam allows the control center to observe Ryder and Ramos. Lieutenant Camonetti of theNew York City Police Department Emergency Service Unit takes over negotiations, which infuriates Ryder, who kills the train's motorman to force Camonetti to bring Garber back.
Camonetti learns that Garber is being investigated for allegedly accepting a $35,000 bribe over a contract for new Japanese subway cars. Ryder also discovers the allegations online and forces Garber to confess by threatening to kill a passenger. To save the hostage, Garber claims that he was offered the bribe while deciding between two companies, using the money to pay for his child's college tuition, and insists he would have made the same decision regardless. The mayor agrees to Ryder's ransom, ordering the police to deliver it. En route, the police car crashes and fails to deliver the money in time. Garber attempts to bluff Ryder that the ransom has arrived, unaware he has been monitoring events on his laptop. Ryder threatens to execute a child's mother, but another hostage, a former soldier named Wallace, sacrifices himself and is killed. A brief gunfight erupts after an Emergency Services Unit sniper is bitten by a rat and discharges his weapon, killing Ramos.
Based on clues from Garber's conversations, the police discover that Ryder is Dennis Ford, a manager at a private equity firm who was sentenced to prison forinvestment fraud. Ford had agreed to a plea bargain to serve three years, but received ten years instead. One of the mayor's aides mentions the extreme drop in the major stock indexes, and the mayor infers that Ryder is attempting to manipulate the market viaput options. Ryder demands that Garber deliver the ransom money himself to avoid coming in contact with the police. Garber is flown to the terminal, where he is given a pistol for protection. Ryder brings Garber aboard and orders him to operate the train down the tunnel below33rd Street, where Garber and the hijackers exit, rigging the train to go on without them. Garber manages to separate himself at a railway crossing and then follows Ryder toTrack 61 underneathWaldorf Astoria hotel. Ryder parts from Bashkin and Emri, who are shot dead after being surrounded by police and provokingdeadly force in an apparentsuicide by cop. The train comes to a screeching halt safely just beforeConey Island (West 8th Street-New York Aquarium), and the police discover that Ryder is no longer on board.
Ryder hails a taxi, with Garber following him on-foot, and finds out that his scheme has amassed $307 million. Garber steals a car and pursues Ryder. After a brief chase, they reach theManhattan Bridge's pedestrian walkway, where Garber catches up with Ryder and holds him at gunpoint. Ryder gives him a 10-second ultimatum to pull the trigger, and in the final seconds, pulls out his own gun and forces Garber to shoot him. Telling Garber in his final breath, "You're my goddamn hero", Ryder collapses and dies (as Garber solemnly looks on while Camonetti observes approvingly from a chopper).
The mayor thanks Garber and assures him the city will "go to bat" for him over his bribery admission. The film concludes as Garber returns home to his wife with groceries he had promised to pick up.
The first drafts of the script faced the challenge of updating the novel with contemporary technology, including cell phones, global positioning systems, the Internet, laptops, andthermal imaging, as well as the environment of apost-9/11 world in New York City. In December 2007,David Koepp, who adapted the novel for Scott and Washington said:[7]
I wrote many drafts to try and put it in the present day and keep all the great execution that was there from the first one. It’s thirty years later so you have to take certain things into account. Hopefully we came up with a clever way to move it to the present.
Koepp's drafts were meant to be "essentially familiar" to those who read the novel, preserving the "great hero vs. villain thing" of the original.[7] Brian Helgeland, the only one who received credit for the screenplay, took the script in a different direction, making the remake more like the 1974 film than the novel and, as Helgeland put it, making it about "two guys who weren't necessarily all that different from each other".[4] As writer Michael Ordoña describes it:[4]
Whereas the novel is told from more than 30 perspectives — keeping readers off balance because it is unknown which characters the writer might suddenly discard — the two films focus on the lead hijacker and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority employee with whom he communicates by phone. The new version sharpens that focus until it's almost exclusively a duel between disgraced MTA dispatcher Walter Garber and manic gunman Ryder.
In the book and original film, Ryder is "cold-blooded and calculating", but in the 2009 film, he is a "loose cannon willing to kill innocents not out of necessity but out of spite".[4] Also, Ryder in the original film and book is portrayed as a normal-looking businessman, while in the 2009 film, he looks as if he has adopted prison life, sporting very visible prison tattoos, and the laid-back style of a biker.
In the 1974 film, the main character (played byWalter Matthau) is named Zachary Garber and is a lieutenant in the transit police; in the 2009 film, the main character (played byDenzel Washington) is named Walter Garber (which incidentally may be an in-house tribute to the late Walter Matthau), and works as a subway train dispatcher.
Ryder also demands $10 million instead of $1 million as in the original film and book or $5 million in the made-for-TV film. Ryder does not use the "Mr. Blue" nickname as in the original film. Instead, Ryder is a nickname adopted by Dennis Ford.
In the 1974 film, the train-operating hostage-taker is the only member of the group to live long enough to see himself behind bars, while all of the hostage-takers die in the 2009 film.
Production began in March 2008 with all cast and crew being required to attend a track safety course taught byMTA personnel, as much of the filming would take place in the subway on active tracks.[8][9] For the initial hijack sequence atGrand Central on theFlushing Line, the crew used the westbound track during late night hours while regular7 train service operated in both directions on the eastbound track. AnR142A train (the model previously used on the6 train at the time) was used for the Grand Central sequence. Many locations in Brooklyn were used during filming. A large portion was filmed on theTransit Museum local track between theHoyt–Schermerhorn Streets station and theNew York Transit Museum on theFulton Street Line.[10][11]
For exterior filming only,R62A car #2079 was used during filming to give the appearance of an R142A car.[12] Interior car scenes were filmed at theKaufman Astoria Studios inQueens on a set that more closely resembles the newer and largerR160B (which were still being delivered at the time of filming).[13] Outdoor street filming locations were the lower level of theManhattan Bridge;Tudor City, including the First Avenue tunnel near theHeadquarters of the United Nations; theUpper East Side;Times Square and theTheater District area; theWhitlock Avenue station on thePelham Line inHunts Point, Bronx; andTurtle Bay.[14] Some scenes were also shot inLower Manhattan.
The scene with the police leaving the Brooklyn Federal Reserve, which does not exist, was actually the rear of theUnited States Postal Service Office of the Inspector General, located next to theWorld Trade Center, in front of thePATH station entrance.
The film was originally scheduled to release on July 31, 2009, but the release was moved earlier to June 12, 2009. The first theatrical poster was released on February 10, 2009, while the first trailer for the film debuted at the screenings ofThe International on February 13, 2009.
John Travolta decided against promoting the film, as it was released just five months after the death of his 16-year-old son, Jett. He stated that he still was not ready to step back into the spotlight. Travolta released the following statement:
Tony, Denzel, Luis, John, James and Sony Pictures stepped up without hesitation to help promote this wonderful film, and their unselfish efforts have allowed my family the additional time to reconcile our loss. I am very proud of the efforts we have all made in making this movie, and I want each and every one of you to enjoy it. So, set your calendars for the weekend of June 12th. I promise you won't be disappointed. Thank you all from the bottom of my heart.[15]
OnRotten Tomatoes,The Taking of Pelham 123 has an approval rating of 51% based on 230 reviews, with an average rating of 5.45/10. The site's critical consensus says: "Despite a strong cast,The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 suffers under the excesses of Tony Scott's frantic direction, and fails to measure up to the 1974 original."[16] OnMetacritic the film has a weighted average score of 55 out of 100, based on 33 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[17] Audiences polled byCinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B+" on an A+ to F scale.[18]
Jim Ridley of theVillage Voice noted that the newPelham film was not as good as the original: "Scott's redo comes up short in almost every regard against the '74 model ... If it's somehow unfair to compare the two, why wasThe Taking of Pelham 123 even remade?"[19] "As expected, Tony Scott’s hyperkinetic, entirely unnecessary revamp attempts to updatePelham by cranking the volume and inflating the Noo Yawk attitude to a cartoonish level of macho posturing," wrote Sean Burns inPhiladelphia Weekly.[20] Writing inNew York Press, Armond White was critical of Tony Scott's direction: "Tony Scott’s craft cannot create suspense, it substitutes noise, cursing and brutality."[21] Michael Rechtshaffen ofThe Hollywood Reporter noted: "Even with the plot's built-in ticking clock, the film relinquishes the tautly calibrated pace in the third act, never to get completely back on track."[22]David Edelstein's review forNew York Magazine carried the headline "The Taking of Pelham 123 is not worth running down a flight of subway-station stairs for."[23]
Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, and began his review with "There's not much wrong with Tony Scott'sThe Taking of Pelham 123, except that there's not much really right about it."[24] Ebert commented that the lead actors lacked passion in their performances: "Oh, John Travolta is angry and Denzel Washington is determined, but you don’t sense passion in the performances. They’re about behaving, not evoking."[24] He also compared it unfavorably with the 1974 original, calling it "less juicy" and opining that the special effects are "not an improvement".[24]Christy Lemire of theAssociated Press gave the film two out of four stars, and called it "another overcaffeinated thriller".[25][26]
Writing for theOrlando Sentinel, Roger Moore gave the film three out of five stars, and commented "Pelham, for its crowd-pleasing heart-racing virtues ... plays out like a Tony–Denzel pairing that Denzel, at least, should have taken a pass on."[27] In a review forMSNBC,Alonso Duralde was critical of John Travolta's performance in the film, comparing it to his roles inSwordfish (2001) andBattlefield Earth (2000): "Travolta remains singularly unbelievable as a villain. In movies like this andSwordfish and, let's not forget,Battlefield Earth, the actor strives for malice but generally can’t get much darker than playground-bully meanness."[28] Peter Travers, writing forRolling Stone, gave the film 3.5 stars out of 4, stating, "This movie hits you like 600 volts from a sparking third rail. Damn straight it's electrifying [...] The only letdown comes in Scott's handling of the passengers, who remain frustratingly generic."[29]
Film criticIgnatiy Vishnevetsky, writing in his blog, commented that he loved the film, and thought it was one of three of Scott's great movies of the 2000s, saying: "... the coherence in his films is not between the pages of a script; it's between shots, and his greatest asset (both to himself and to cinema as a whole) is his ability to construct scenes out of shots that take place across great distances of space or time, as in his two best movies:Déjà Vu (much of whose running time consists of characters watching a past event through a sort oftime machine) and his remake ofThe Taking of Pelham 123 (where the two main characters develop a complex relationship, despite not meeting until the end of the movie)."[30]
In 2025,The Hollywood Reporter listedThe Taking of Pelham 123 as having the best stunts of 2009.[31]
The film debuted in the number three spot with approximately US$25 million at the box office in the United States in its opening weekend, in whatThe New York Times called "an unusually quiet weekend at the box office because of soft ticket sales forThe Taking of Pelham 123".[32]The film was beaten out byThe Hangover andUp for the number one and number two spots.[33]The Taking of Pelham 123 had a production budget of $100 million and was co-financed withRelativity Media andSony Pictures.[33] Ben Fritz of theLos Angeles Times commented on the box office results of the film's opening weekend ($23,373,102): "Although far from disastrous, that's a soft start for a film budgeted at more than $100 million."[34] The film earned $150,166,126 worldwide during its release from June 12 to August 23, 2009.[2]
DVD andBlu-ray versions of the movie with bonus features were released on November 3, 2009. The film opened up at No. 3 at the DVD sales chart, making $14.1m off 919,000 DVD units in the first week of release.[1] These features included commentaries andbehind-the-scenes featurettes. In South Korea, the DVD and Blu-ray were released in October, 2009.[35] The digital release of the film is in16x9open matte.
