 | |
 | |
| Abbreviation | Heritage[3][4] |
|---|---|
| Formation | February 16, 1973 (52 years ago) (1973-02-16) |
| Type | Nonprofit |
| Headquarters | 214Massachusetts AvenueNE,Washington, D.C., U.S. |
| Location |
|
President | Kevin D. Roberts |
Chair | Barbara Van Andel-Gaby[1] |
| Revenue | US$101 million[2] (2023) |
| Expenses | US$108 million[2] (2023) |
| Website | www |
The Heritage Foundation (or simplyHeritage)[3][4] is an Americanright-wingthink tank based inWashington, D.C. Founded in 1973, it took a leading role in the conservative movement in the 1980s during thepresidency ofRonald Reagan, whose policies were taken from Heritage Foundation studies, including itsMandate for Leadership.[5][6]
The Heritage Foundation has had significantinfluence in U.S.public policy making, and has historically been ranked among the most influential public policy organizations in theUnited States.[7] In 2010, it founded a sister organization,Heritage Action, an influential activist force in conservative andRepublican politics.[8][9][10][11]
Heritage leadsProject 2025, also known as the 2025 Presidential Transition Project, an extensive plan that includes appointing ideologically aligned civil servants, restricting abortion access, opposing LGBTQ+ rights, transforming federal agencies for political purposes, and imposing strict immigration policies.[12][13][14]
The foundation was established on February 16, 1973, during theNixon administration byPaul Weyrich,Edwin Feulner, andJoseph Coors.[15][16][17] Growing out of the new business activist movement inspired by thePowell Memorandum,[18][19][20] Weyrich and Feulner sought to create a conservative version of theBrookings Institution that advanced conservative policies.[15][6]
Coors was Heritage's earliest funding source,[17] seeding the organization with an initial $250,000.[6] BillionaireRichard Mellon Scaife followed up a year later, using theScaife Family Charitable Trust to donate tens of millions to the foundation over the next two decades as its primary donor.[21] Weyrich was the foundation's first president. Under Weyrich's successor, Frank J. Walton, the Heritage Foundation began usingdirect mail fundraising, which contributed to the growth of its annual income, which reached $1 million in 1976.[17] By 1981, the annual budget was $5.3 million.[15]
The foundation advocated pro-business policies andanti-communism in its early years, but distinguished itself from theAmerican Enterprise Institute (AEI) by also advocating forcultural issues important toChristian conservatives.[15] But throughout the 1970s, the Heritage Foundation remained small relative to Brookings and AEI.[15]
In January 1981, the Heritage Foundation publishedMandate for Leadership, a comprehensive report aimed at reducing the size of thefederal government. It provided public policy guidance to the incomingReagan administration, and included over 2,000 specific policy recommendations for the Reagan administration to use the federal government to advance conservative policies. The report was well received by theWhite House, and several of its authors went on to take positions in the Reagan administration.[22]Ronald Reagan liked the ideas so much that he gave a copy to each member of hiscabinet to review.[23] About 60% of the 2,000 Heritage proposals were implemented or initiated by the end of Reagan's first year in office.[22][24] Reagan later called the Heritage Foundation a "vital force" during his presidency.[23]
The foundation was influential in developing and advancing theReagan Doctrine, a key Reagan administrationforeign policy initiative under which the U.S. began providing military and other support toanti-communist resistance movements fightingSoviet-aligned governments inAfghanistan,Angola,Cambodia,Nicaragua, and other nations during the final years of theCold War.[25]
After Reagan met withMikhail Gorbachev inMoscow in the 1980s,The Wall Street Journal reported, "the Soviet leader offered a complaint: Reagan was influenced by the Heritage Foundation, Washington's conservative think tank. The outfit lent intellectual energy to the Gipper’s agenda, including the Reagan Doctrine—the idea that America should support insurgents resisting communist domination."[26]
The foundation also supported the development of a newballistic missile defense system for the United States. In 1983, Reagan made the development of this new defense system, known as theStrategic Defense Initiative, his top defense priority.[22]
By mid-decade, the Heritage Foundation had begun emerging as a key organization in the national conservative movement, publishing influential reports on a broad range of policy issues by prominent conservative thought leaders.[27] In 1986, in recognition of the Heritage Foundation's fast-growing influence,Time magazine called the Heritage Foundation "the foremost of the new breed of advocacy tanks".[28] It served as the brain trust on foreign policy for the Reagan andGeorge H. W. Bush administrations.[29]
The foundation remained an influential voice on domestic and foreign policy issues during PresidentGeorge H. W. Bush'sadministration. In 1990 and 1991, the foundation was a leading proponent ofOperation Desert Storm designed toliberate Kuwait followingSaddam Hussein'sinvasion and occupation ofKuwait in August 1990. According toBaltimore Sun Washington bureau chief Frank Starr, the Heritage Foundation's studies "laid much of the groundwork for Bush administration thinking" about post-Soviet foreign policy.[30]
The foundation continued to grow throughout the 1990s. The foundation's flagship journal,Policy Review, reached a circulation of 23,000. In 1993, Heritage was an opponent of theClinton health care plan, which died in theU.S. Senate the following year, in August 1994.
In the1994 congressional elections,Republicans took control of theHouse of Representatives, andNewt Gingrich was elected as the newHouse Speaker in January 1995, largely based on commitments made in theContract with America, which was issued six weeks prior to the 1994 elections. The contract was a pact of principles that directly challenged the political status quo in Washington, D.C. and many of the ideas at the heart of theClinton administration.[31]
The foundation also became engaged in theculture wars, publishingThe Index of Leading Cultural Indicators byWilliam Bennett in 1994. TheIndex documented how crime, illegitimacy, divorce, teenage suicide, drug use, and fourteen other social indicators had worsened measurably since the 1960s.[32]
In 1995, the Heritage Foundation published its firstIndex of Economic Freedom, an annual publication that assesses the state ofeconomic freedom in every country in the world; two years later, in 1997,The Wall Street Journal joined the project as a co-manager and co-author of the annual publication.[33]
In 1996, Clinton aligned some of hiswelfare reforms with the Heritage Foundation's recommendations, incorporating them into thePersonal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act.[34][35]
Following theSeptember 11 attacks in 2001, the Heritage Foundation supported the wars inAfghanistan andIraq in thewar on terror.[36][37] The foundation challenged opposition to the war.[38] They defended theGeorge W. Bush administration's treatment of suspected terrorists atGuantanamo Bay.[36]
In April 2005,The Washington Post reported that the Heritage Foundation softened its criticism of theMalaysian government after Heritage Foundation presidentEdwin Feulner initiated a business relationship withMalaysian prime ministerMahathir Mohamad. "Heritage's new, pro-Malaysian outlook emerged at the same time a Hong Kong consulting firm co-founded by Edwin J. Feulner, Heritage's president, began representing Malaysian business interests" through his relationship withBelle Haven Consultants.[39][40] The foundation denied a conflict of interest, saying that its views on Malaysia changed following the country's cooperation with the U.S. after the September 11 attacks,[41] and the Malaysian government "moving in the right economic and political direction."[42][43]
_Adm._Gary_Roughead_speaks_at_the_Heritage_Foundation.jpg)
In March 2010, theObama administration introduced ahealth insurance mandate in theAffordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, an idea that the foundation supported in an October 1989 study, "Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans".[44] In 2006, the mandate proposed in the Heritage Foundation study had been incorporated intoMassachusetts governorMitt Romney'shealth care plan, known as "Romneycare," forMassachusetts.[45] The foundation opposed the Affordable Care Act.[8]
In April 2010, partly inspired by the model of the Center for American Progress Action Fund, founded by the progressiveCenter for American Progress, the foundation launchedHeritage Action as a sister501(c)4 organization designed to expand Heritage's political influence and reach.[8][46] The new group quickly became influential.[8][9]
In July 2011, the Heritage Foundation published a widely criticized study onpoverty in the United States,[47] which was denounced byThe New Republic,The Nation, theCenter for American Progress, andThe Washington Post.[48][49][50][51]
In December 2012,Jim DeMint, then aU.S. senator fromSouth Carolina, announced that he intended to resign from the U.S. Senate to replace Feulner as the foundation's president.[52] As Heritage Foundation president, DeMint was paid $1 million annually, making him the highest-paid think tank president in Washington, D.C., at the time.[53][54]
DeMint's hiring led some pundits to predict that he would bring the foundation a sharper, more politicized edge.[55] DeMint led changes to a long-standing process the foundation had utilized for the publication of its policy papers, which historically were authored by policy experts and then reviewed by senior departmental staff.[56] Under DeMint, however, his team heavily edited policy papers and sometimes shelved them entirely.[56] In response to DeMint's new practice, several scholars at the foundation quit.[56]
In May 2013,Jason Richwine, a senior fellow at the foundation, resigned after hisHarvard UniversityPh.D. thesis, authored in 2009, and comments he made at a 2008American Enterprise Institute forum, drew extensive media scrutiny. In his thesis and at in the earlier American Enterprise Institute forum, Richwine argued thatHispanics andBlacks areintellectually inferior to whites with a supposed predisposition to lowerIQs, leading them to struggle in assimilating.[57][58] A foundation study that month by Richwine andRobert Rector also was widely criticized across the political spectrum for methodology the two used in criticizingimmigration reform legislation.[59]Reason magazine and theCato Institute criticized it for failing to employdynamic scoring, which Heritage previously incorporated in analyzing other policy proposals.[60][61]
In July 2013, following disputes with the Heritage Foundation over thefarm bill, theRepublican Study Committee, which then included 172 conservative U.S. House members, reversed a decades-old tradition and barred Heritage employees from attending its weekly meeting in theU.S. Capitol, though it continued cooperating with the foundation through "regular joint events and briefings".[62]
In September 2015, the Heritage Foundation announced that it had been targeted byhackers, which resulted in the theft of donors' information stored in its systems.The Hill, a Washington, D.C.–based newspaper covering politics, compared the cyberattack on the foundation to a similar one against theU.S. Office of Personnel Management several months earlier byChina'sJiangsu State Security Department, a subsidiary of theMinistry of State Security spy agency, which accessed security clearance information on millions offederal government employees. After announcing the hacking, the foundation released no further information about it.[63][64]
In June 2015,Donald Trump announced his candidacy for the2016 Republican presidential nomination. In July 2015, appearing on aFox News panel,Michael Needham, leader ofHeritage Action, the foundation's advocacy arm, said, "Donald Trump's a clown. He needs to be out of the race."[65]
The following month, in August, a Heritage Foundation economic writer,Stephen Moore, criticized Trump's policy positions, saying, "the problem for Trump is that he’s full of all of these contradictions. He’s kind of a tabula rasa on policy."[66] In December 2015, then Heritage Foundation executive vice presidentKim Holmes, authored an essay opposing Trump and his candidacy forPublic Discourse, published by theWitherspoon Institute, aPrinceton, New Jersey-based think tank, which criticized Trump as "not a conservative." Holmes also criticized Trump supporters, writing that, "they are behaving more like an alienated class ofMarxist imagination than as social agents of stability and tradition. They are indeed thinking like revolutionaries, only now their ire is aimed at their progressive masters and the institutions they control," he wrote.[67] Then Heritage presidentJim DeMint "praised bothRubio andCruz, but said that he couldn’t 'make a recommendation coming from Heritage'."[68]
After Trump secured the Republican nomination and only a few days prior to the2016 general election, the foundation's Restore America Project began emailing potential political appointees in the event Trump won the presidency. "I need to assess your interest in serving as a presidential appointee in an administration that will promote conservative principles," the email said. It asked that questionnaires and a resume or bio be returned to them by October 26, roughly a week prior to the general election.[69]
.jpg)
Following Trump's victory in the 2016 presidential election, the Heritage Foundation obtained influence in hispresidential transition andadministration.[70][56][71] The foundation had a say in the staffing of the administration withCNN reporting in January 2017 that, "no other Washington institution has that kind of footprint in the transition."[70] One reason for the Heritage Foundation's disproportionate influence relative to other conservative think tanks, CNN reported, was that other conservative think tanks had "Never Trump" staff during the2016 presidential election, while the Heritage Foundation ultimately signaled that it would be supportive of him.[70][56]
Drawing from a database that the foundation began building in 2014 of approximately 3,000 conservatives it trusted to serve in a hypothetical Republican administration, at least 66 foundation employees and alumni were hired into theTrump's first presidential term.[56] According to employees involved in developing the foundation's database, several hundred people from the database ultimately entered the Trump administration and at least five,Betsy DeVos,Mick Mulvaney,Rick Perry,Scott Pruitt,Jeff Sessions, became members of Trump's cabinet.[56]Jim DeMint, president of the foundation from 2013 to 2017, personally intervened on behalf of Mulvaney, who ended up heading theOffice of Management and Budget and theConsumer Financial Protection Bureau, and later served as Trump's actingWhite House chief of staff.[56]
In May 2017, the foundation's board of trustees voted unanimously to terminate DeMint as its president. In a public statement, the foundation's board said that, following a thorough investigation of the foundation's operations under DeMint's management, they found "significant and worsening management issues that led to a breakdown of internal communications and cooperation." "While the organization has seen many successes," the board said in the statement, "Jim DeMint and a handful of his closest advisers failed to resolve these problems."[72] DeMint's firing was praised by some, including former U.S. representativeMickey Edwards (R-OK), who said he saw it as a step to pare back the foundation's partisan edge and restore its reputation as a pioneering think tank.[72] In January 2018,Kay Coles James succeeded DeMint as the foundation's president. The same month, a year into the first Trump presidential term, Heritage said the Trump administration had embraced 64% of 334 policies in the foundation's agenda.[73][74]
In February 2021, after Trumplost reelection, the Heritage Foundation hired three former Trump administration officials,Ken Cuccinelli,Mark A. Morgan, andChad Wolf, who held various roles in immigration-related functions in the Trump administration. Cuccinelli and Wolf authored several publications in 2021 before leaving the foundation.[75][76][77]
At the same time, Heritage also hired formerU.S. vice presidentMike Pence as a distinguished visiting fellow. The following month, in March 2021, Pence authored an op-ed column, which madefalse claims of fraud in the2020 presidential election, including numerous false claims about theFor the People Act, aDemocrat-supported bill designed to expandvoting rights. Pence's false claims drew criticism and corrections from multiple media outlets andfact-checking organizations.[78][79][80] Pence left the foundation in 2022.[81][82]
The foundation's positions and management underKay Coles James drew criticism from conservatives and Trump allies, which intensified in 2020 and 2021. "In the early days of thepandemic in spring 2020, Heritage leadership under James rejected an article from one of its scholars denouncing government restrictions, two people with knowledge of the matter said. The foundation's offices stayed closed for about three months, and signs urging masking became something of a joke for many conservatives who mocked the concept,"The Washington Post reported in February 2022. Conservatives also began commenting publicly that the Heritage Foundation had lost the significant intellectual and political clout that led to the foundation's ascent as a global and national political and policy force in the 1980s and 1990s. Think-tank leader and commentatorAvik Roy toldThe Washington Post, "People do not walk around in fear of the Heritage Foundation the way they did 10 years ago". In March 2021, in response to mounting criticism of her leadership of the foundation, James and executive vice presidentKim Holmes resigned from the foundation.[83]
In October 2021, the Heritage Foundation announced thatKevin Roberts, who previously led a state-based think tank,Texas Public Policy Foundation and was a member of Texas governorGreg Abbott'sCOVID-19 task force, would replace James as the foundation's new president.[83][84] According to the foundation's filing with theInternal Revenue Service, Roberts was compensated $953,920 annually as of 2023.[85]
In May 2022, the Heritage Foundation began opposing military aid toUkraine designed to repelRussia's invasion of the nation, which the foundation previously supported.[86] Following the reversal of its position on military aid to Ukraine, the foundation claimed, "Ukraine Aid Package Puts America Last".[87] In September 2022, the foundation's foreign policy director said the foundation ordered him to retract his earlier statements supporting aid to Ukraine; he subsequently left the organization.[88] In August 2023, Thomas Spoehr, the foundation's Center for National Defense director, resigned his position over the dramatic policy change.[89]
In September 2022, Luke Coffey, then director of the Heritage Foundation's Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy, said he was "required by management to remove aTwitter post condemning theJanuary 6 Capitol riots."[88]
In March 2023, the Heritage Foundation established a cooperative relationship with theDanube Institute, aBudapest-based state-funded think tank founded in 2013.[90]
In January 2024, Roberts told journalistLulu Garcia-Navarro in an interview that he sees Heritage's role as "institutionalizingTrumpism".[91][92] Garcia-Navarro summarized this role as "leading Project 2025...[to] consolidate power in the executive branch, dismantle federal agencies and recruit and vet government employees to free the next Republican president from a system...stacked against conservative power."[91]The Economist reported the following month that Heritage was incrementally embracingnational conservatism as its guiding ideology.[93]
In May 2024, the Heritage Foundation donated $100,000 to theAmerican Accountability Foundation (AAF) for the purpose of AAF developing a website that features personal information of career civil servants, who AAF describes as "America's Most Subversive Immigration Bureaucrats". The website publicly features their photographs, small-dollar political donations, and screenshots of their personal social media accounts.[94]
In July 2024, according to theAssociated Press, the foundation had promoted a conspiracy theory that Biden may attempt to use force to remain in office following the2024 election if he lost, which ultimately never happened since Bidenwithdrew from the election nine days later, on July 21, and Trump ultimately defeatedKamala Harris in the general election and peacefully assumed the presidency in January 2025.[95] The same month, in July 2024,The Washington Post reported that, four months before the general election was even held, Heritage had already declared the election illegitimate.[96] In September 2024,The New York Times reported that the Heritage Foundation used deceptive videos during the2024 US election campaign to falsely claim thatnoncitizen voting posed a major threat.[97]
The Heritage Foundation has historically ranked among the world's most influential think tanks, influencing concrete policies, media, and political discourse in general. In 2020, theGlobal Go To Think Tank Index Report, published by theUniversity of Pennsylvania, ranked the foundation sixth on its list of "top ten think tanks in the United States", 13th among think tanks globally, and first in its category of think tanks having the most significant impact on public policy between 2017 and 2019.[98]
From its 1973 founding through 2001, the Heritage Foundation publishedPolicy Review, a public policy journal and its flagship publication; the journal was acquired by theHoover Institution in 2001.[99]
In 1981, the Heritage Foundation publishedMandate for Leadership, which offered specific policy recommendations on policy, budget, and administrative action for the incomingReagan administration.[100] Eight additional editions ofMandate for Leadership have been published since.[101]
In 1983, the Heritage Foundation's foundedthe Heritage Foundation's Asian Studies Center, which publishes research studies and commentary onAsia and thePacific Rim and U.S. policy toward the region. The center also has hosted Asia-specific lectures byHenry Kissinger (1995),Donald Rumsfeld (1988),Paul Wolfowitz (2000),Henry Paulson (2007), andothers.
The Heritage Foundation is an associate member of theState Policy Network, founded in 1992, a network of conservative and libertarian organizations financed by theKoch brothers,Philip Morris, and other corporate sources.[102][103][104]
Since 1995, the Heritage Foundation has publishedIndex of Economic Freedom, an annual publication that measures countries' state ofeconomic freedom, usingproperty rights, freedom from government regulation, corruption in government, barriers tointernational trade,income tax and corporate tax rates, government expenditures,rule of law and the ability to enforce contracts, regulatory burdens, banking restrictions,labor regulations, andblack market activities as key metrics.[105][106]
In 1997,The Wall Street Journal began partnering with Heritage as co-manager and co-editor of theIndex of Economic Freedom.[33] In 2014,Charles W. L. Hill, a professor at theFoster School of Business at theUniversity of Washington, criticized theIndex of Economic Freedom, writing that, "given that the Heritage Foundation has a political agenda, its work should be viewed with caution."[107]
In November 2011, the Heritage Foundation and theAmerican Enterprise Institute (AEI) co-hosted adebate among the candidates for the 2012 Republicanpresidential nomination on foreign policy and national defense issues, which was televised byCNN[108] and was the firstpresidential debate hosted by Heritage or AEI.[109] Heritage fellowsEdwin Meese andDavid Addington were among the debate's moderators.[110] Following the debate, political commentatorMichael Barone wrote inThe Washington Examiner that it was "probably the most substantive and serious presidential debate of this election cycle."[111]
In June 2014, the Heritage Foundation phased out its blog, the Foundry, replacing it withthe Daily Signal, a news and conservative commentary website.[112][113] A decade later, in June 2024,The Signal became an independent publication with its own board of directors and leadership.[114]
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg) | This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(November 2025) |
| This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(November 2025) |
Project Esther is an effort by the Heritage Foundation to suppresspro-Palestinian protests[119] and what the group claims isantisemitism. It has been criticized by journalist Steve Rabey for actually incorporatingantisemitic tropes into its own rhetoric, and for failing to address right-wing antisemitism.[120] Critics have said its ultimate aim is to paint groupscritical of Israel asHamas associates.[119]
The Heritage Foundation publishesThe Insider, a quarterly magazine about public policy.[121] In 1995, the Heritage Foundation in participation withNational Review, startedTownhall, a conservative website.[122] The site separated from Heritage in 2005 and was subsequently acquired bySalem Communications.[123]
Beginning in 2002, the Heritage Foundation began publishing "Index of Dependence", an annual report on federal government programs in five areas: housing, health care and welfare, retirement, higher education, and rural and agricultural services that, in its view, constrain private sector or local government alternatives and impact the dependence of individuals on the federal government.[124] The 2010 edition of the "Index of Dependence" concluded that the number of Americans who pay nothing in federal personal income taxes and the number who rely on government services have both increased measurably,[125] and that, over the prior eight years, Americans' dependence on government had grown by almost 33 percent.[126] In February 2012, the foundation's conclusions were challenged byRex Nutting ofMarketWatch, who wrote that the report was "misleading" and "alarmist", that the percentage of Americans "dependent" upon government had remained essentially the same as it was in the 1980s, and that a small increase was attributable to theGreat Recession and anaging population with proportionally more retirees.[127]
In September 2005, the Heritage Foundation established the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom named in honor of the formerBritish prime ministerMargaret Thatcher.[128] Thatcher maintained a long-standing relationship with the Heritage Foundation. In September 1991, shortly after Thatcher left office, the foundation hosted a dinner in Thatcher's honor.[129] Six years later, in 1997, Thatcher delivered the keynote address at Heritage's 25th anniversary celebration.[130] In 2002, Thatcher was again honored by the foundation, which awarded her with its annualClare Boothe Luce Award.[131]
In September 2024, several Heritage Foundation representatives, includingKevin Roberts, participated in theReboot conference inSan Francisco, and the foundation sponsored the event.[132]Project 2025 was a major theme of the conference.[133]
The Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project started in 2022, whose objective the foundation says is "investigating and exposing the Biden administration".[134] The Oversight Project files large numbers ofFOIA information requests to government agencies.
In a late 2024 interview, Oversight Project director Mike Howell estimated that the foundation had filed 50,000 requests over two years. An October 2024 analysis byProPublica showed many requests sought the names of employees who have used certain conservative hot-button keywords in communications, such as "climate equity" and "DEI", the acronym standing fordiversity, equity, and inclusion. The foundation also sought communications with civil rights and voting rights organizations, and the names of allBiden administration appointees.[135]
In May 2024, the Oversight Project publicized a faked flier to falsely accuse an immigration-assistanceNGO of encouraging illegal voting. The social media posts were widely disseminated, and the head of the NGO received threats. The head of the Oversight Project said they had not tried to verify the flier.[136][137][138] The Oversight Project was the publisher of a2024 misleading video, which falsely asserted that 14% of non-citizens in Georgia were registered to vote.[97]
In January 2025, leaked documents from the Oversight Project detailed a plan todox Wikipedia editors alleged to beantisemitic using techniques such as facial recognition software, cross-referencing to a database of hacked information, tricking Wikipedia users into visiting websites that harvestIP addresses, and creatingsock puppet accounts.[139][140] Journalist Stephen Harrison compared the plan to the2021 doxing by pro-Chinese government editors, which led to some Hong Kong editors being physically harmed.[141] Howell said that this investigation of Wikipedia will be "shared with the appropriate policymakers to help inform a strategic response".[142] After a month-long discussion, Wikipedia editors decided to blacklist the Heritage Foundation website, meaning that attempts to link to it on Wikipedia will be automatically blocked.[143]
In March 2025, the Oversight Project promulgated an unfounded story casting doubt on the validity of President Biden's presidential actions, claiming that almost all of the documents signed by Biden had identical signatures and therefore had beensigned by machine. The foundation claimed, "this raises questions of who was really in control during the Biden Presidency", calling Biden the "Hologram President". The story went viral, casting doubt on the validity of Biden's pardons among other actions and suggesting the president had not been cognizant of presidential actions when there actually had been news stories and photo opportunities of the president signing some of the documents the Oversight Project alleged he had not signed. Other presidents used signing technology, and scholars agree such signatures are valid. The identical signatures found by the Oversight Project, the starting point for its false claims, were an image of the president's signature that is inserted into government documents obtained from theFederal Register.[144][145][146][147][148]
The Heritage Foundation considers itself a force forconservatism in the United States. Third party observers have called itright-wing orfar-right, especially with regard toProject 2025.[149] TheLeadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights wrote that Trump was supported by far-right groups such as the Heritage Foundation and theFederalist Society "and other institutions that have been masterminding the takeover of our courts for decades".[150] TheAmerican Federation of Government Employees advised its members that the "far-right Heritage Foundation" was coordinating with Trump to weave Project 2025 into his administration.[151] TheAssociated Press wrote that Project 2025 "started as an obscure far-right wish list" but became an "ultraconservative policy blueprint", a keystone of Trump's second presidential campaign.[152]
The media noticed the shift from conservative to farther right in 2013. Political journalistMolly Ball wrote in theAtlantic that the Heritage Foundation had changed its strategy in several ways. One was the reversal of itspolicy on immigration, which since the 1980s had been welcoming and focused on legalization. From 2006 to 2013, the policy gradually became outright hostile to immigration. In 2013, the foundation also pushed Republican lawmakers to split the latest farm bill (which would pass the next year as theAgricultural Act of 2014) to cut outfood stamp funding. The group then turned on the same lawmakers, instructing them to vote against the main portion of the bill, angering them and their constituents. Also in 2013, the foundation demanded thatRepublicans in Congress shut down the government as way to defundObamacare, while harming many voters economically. The group paid for advertisements against 100 Republican lawmakers who did not toe the line in this regard. Many Republicans expressed anger at this radical shift in tactics; longtime Republican policy analyst Brian Walsh wrote "a scathing op-ed inU.S. News"[153] saying that the foundation had outspent the Democratic Party in attacking Republicans in Congress without targeting any vulnerable Democratic seats.[154]
In September 2021, a Heritage Foundation senior fellow, Mike Gonzalez, released a book,BLM: The New Making of a Marxist Revolution, which characterizesBlack Lives Matter as "a nationwide insurgency" and labels its leaders "avowed Marxists who say they want to dismantle our way of life".[155][156]
The Heritage Foundation rejects thescientifically proven consensus on climate change.[157][158] The foundation is one of manyclimate change denial organizations that have been funded byExxonMobil, an oil and petroleum company that, with over $413 billion in 2022 revenue, is theeighth-largest corporation in the world.[157][159]
In December 1997, the foundation strongly criticized theKyoto Agreement to curbclimate change, arguing that U.S. participation in the treaty would "result in lower economic growth in every state and nearly every sector of the economy."[160] In 2009, the foundation projected that thecap-and-trade bill, known as theAmerican Clean Energy and Security Act, would cost the average U.S. family $1,870 by 2025 and $6,800 by 2035, which varied greatly from conclusions from the non-partisanCongressional Budget Office, which projected that it would cost the average family $175 in 2020.[161]
In 2021, the Heritage Foundation said that one of its two priorities, along with tightening voting laws, was to push Republican-controlled states to ban or restrictcritical race theory instruction.[162] The Heritage Foundation sought to get Republicans in Congress to put anti-critical race theory provisions into must-pass legislation such as the annual defense spending bill.[162]
The Heritage Foundation has promoted false claims ofelectoral fraud.Hans von Spakovsky, who heads the Heritage Foundation's Election Law Reform Initiative, has played an influential role in elevating alarmism about voter fraud in the Republican Party, despite offering no evidence of widespread voter fraud.[163][164] His work, which claims voting fraud is rampant, has been discredited.[165]
Following the2020 presidential election, in which PresidentDonald Trump made baseless claims of fraud after he was defeated for reelection, the Heritage Foundation launched a campaign in support ofRepublican efforts to make state voting laws more restrictive.[166][167]
In March 2021,The New York Times reported that the Heritage Foundation's political arm,Heritage Action, planned to spend $24 million over two years across eight key states to support efforts to restrict voting, in coordination with theRepublican Party and allied conservative outside groups, including theSusan B. Anthony Pro-Life America,American Legislative Exchange Council, andState Policy Network. Almost two dozen election bills introduced by Republican state legislators in early 2021 were based on a Heritage letter and report.[168] Heritage also mobilized in opposition toH.R. 1./S. 1, a Democratic bill to establish uniform nationwide voting standards, including expandedearly andpostal voting,automatic and same-day voter registration, campaign finance law reforms, and prohibitingpartisan redistricting.[166][167]
In May 2021, Heritage Action spent $750,000 on television ads inArizona topromote the false claim that "Democrats...want to register illegal aliens" to vote, even though the Democrats' legislation creates safeguards to ensure that ineligible people cannot register.[167] In April 2021, Heritage Action boasted to its private donors that it had successfully crafted the election reform bills that Republican state legislators introduced inGeorgia and other states.[169]
On January 21, 2024, after three years of silence on Trump's position that Biden was an illegitimate president and that Trump actually won the 2020 election,Lulu Garcia-Navarro, a reporter forThe New York Times, presented the question to Heritage presidentKevin Roberts: "Do you believe that President Biden won the 2020 election?" "No", Roberts replied.[170]
The New York Times reported in September 2024 that "the notion that [noncitizens] will flood the polls—and vote overwhelmingly for Democrats—is animating a sprawling network of Republicans who mobilized around" Trump after he claimed the 2020 election was rigged, and "the false theories about widespread noncitizen voting could be used to dispute the outcome again." In summer 2024, the HeritageOversight Project produced videos for distribution on social media and conservative media outlets that made false or misleading claims about the extent of noncitizen voting registrations. In one video that was sent viral by anElon Musk repost, Heritage falsely claimed that 14% of noncitizens in Georgia were registered, concluding, "the integrity of the 2024 election is in great jeopardy." Heritage based their findings on an extrapolation of hidden camera interview responses from seven residents in aNorcross, Georgia apartment complex. State investigators found the seven people had never registered.[97] Heritage maintains an election fraud database that in 2024 showed just 68 documented instances of noncitizen voting since the 1980s, and just 10 of those were in the country illegally.[171] When Heritage president Kevin Roberts was presented in June 2024 with data from the Heritage database indicating there were only 1,513 total instances of voter fraud in the United States since 1982, he responded that fraud is "very hard to document, and theDemocrat party is very good at fraud." When asked if Heritage would accept the results of the 2024 presidential election regardless of who wins, Roberts replied, "yes, if there isn't massive fraud like there was in 2020." Despite the persistence of anelection denial movement, no evidence of material election fraud in 2020 was found.[172][173]
In July 2024, Mike Powell, Heritage's executive director for its Oversight Project said, "as things stand right now, there is a zero percent chance of a free and fair election in the United States of America," adding, "I'm formally accusing the Biden administration of creating the conditions that most reasonable policymakers and officials cannot in good conscience certify an election." Heritage released a report predicting without supporting evidence that Biden might try to retain power "by force" if he were to lose in November. Election law expertRick Hasen remarked, "this isgaslighting and it is dangerous in fanning flames that could lead to potential violence."[174][175]
In 2013, a Heritage Foundation panel denounced theBoy Scouts of America organization's proposal to allow membership for gay boy scouts, but not gay scout leaders. Heritage's panelists variously argued that the proposal, if implemented, would be a "fatal concession" that would lead to "increased boy on boy contact", "moral confusion", and damage to "understanding of fatherhood" or "character formation".[176][177]
The Heritage Foundation has controversially opposedgay marriage,[178][179] including both the 2015Obergefell v. Hodges decision by the Supreme Court,[180][181][182] and the 2022Respect for Marriage Act.[183][178] Ahead of theObergefell ruling, Heritage'sRyan T. Anderson argued that gay acceptance is linked tosingle motherhood,sexual permissiveness, and reformed divorce laws. He added that the issue should beleft to the states, but that the states should not legalize gay marriage either.[180] Arguing against the 2022 Respect for Marriage Act, Heritage'sRoger Severino stated: "Marriage is the exclusive, lifelong, conjugal union between one man and one woman, and any departure from that design hurts the indispensable goal of having every child raised in a stable home by the mom and dad who conceived him."[184] In 2010, the Heritage Foundation also conducted meetings, which included social researchers opposed to gay marriage, which reportedly helped lead to the publication of the controversialNew Family Structures Study.[179][185]
The group has engaged in several activities in opposition totransgender rights, including hosting several anti-transgender rights events,[186][187] developing and supporting legislation templates against transgender rights,[188][189][190] and making claims about transgender youth healthcare and suicide rates based on internal research, which are contradicted by numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies.[191] The Heritage Foundation–led initiativeProject 2025 proposed LGBT-related policies, including the limiting of LGBTanti-discrimination protections, and aban on transgender people from the military.[192]
In May 2022,Heritage Action, the Heritage Foundation's political activism organization, announced its opposition to the $40 billionmilitary aid package forUkraine passed that month following theRussian invasion of Ukraine in February, completely reversing the organization's previous position of support for such aid.[193][194] The Heritage Foundation's foreign policy director at the time, Luke Coffey, said he was ordered to retract his earlier statements supporting aid to Ukraine; he subsequently left the foundation.[88]
In August 2023, newly installed Heritage president Kevin Roberts wrote in an op-ed column that Congress was holding victims of the2023 Hawaii wildfires hostage "in order to spend more money in Ukraine". The op-ed was followed by a public messaging campaign with the same message and with a tweet by a Heritage vice president, who argued, "It's time to end the blank, undated checks for Ukraine." This, in turn, led the foundation's second senior official, Lt. Gen. (Ret) Thomas Spoehr, director of Heritage's Center for National Defense, to submit his resignation.[89][195]
| This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(November 2025) |
In October 2025, the Heritage Foundation publicly supportedTucker Carlson after Carlson had theneo-Nazi and Holocaust denierNick Fuentes on his podcast. The Heritage Foundation's defense of Carlson ignited a debate about antisemitism among conservatives.[196][197][198] Republicans includingTed Cruz andMitch McConnell condemned the foundation's defense of Carlson.[199] A number of people resigned from the foundation when it was clear that no public retraction would be made, including board memberRobert P. George, distinguished fellowChristopher DeMuth, chief of staff Ryan Neuhaus, and at least five members of the foundation's antisemitism task force.[200]
Heritage is a tax-exempt501(c)(3) organization andBBB Wise Giving Alliance-accredited charity funded by donations from private individuals, corporations, and charitable foundations.[201][202][203] It is not required to disclose its donors and donations under the current laws that guide tax-deductible organizations.[202]
In 1973, businessmanJoseph Coors contributed $250,000 to establish the Heritage Foundation and continued to fund it through theAdolph Coors Foundation.[204][205] The foundation's trustees have historically included individuals affiliated withChase Manhattan Bank,Dow Chemical,General Motors,Mobil,Pfizer,Sears, and other corporations.[206]
In the 1980s, the Heritage Foundation reportedly received a $2.2 million donation from theKorean Central Intelligence Agency, theintelligence agency ofSouth Korea.[207]
As of 2010, the foundation reported that it had 710,000 individual financial contributors.[208]
For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011,CharityWatch reported thatEdwin Feulner, the Heritage Foundation's past president, received the highest compensation in its top 25 list of compensation received by charity members. Two years later, in 2013, according to CharityWatch, Feulner received $2,702,687, which included investment earnings of $1,656,230 accrued over 33 years.[209]
As of 2013, Heritage is a grantee ofDonorsTrust, anAlexandria, Virginia-based nonprofitdonor-advised fund.[210][211][212]
In 2023, the foundation's total revenue was $101 million and its expenditures were $103 million, according to its filings with theInternal Revenue Service, reported byProPublica.[2] Among its 517 employees as of 2023, average compensation was $96,000 annually, and 15 employees were paid in excess of $300,000 annually that year. The foundation's president,Kevin Roberts, was compensated $953,920 annually in 2023.[85]
As of June 2024, eighteen individuals serve as members of the organization's board of trustees. Notable members include:
Notable former board members include:
Heritage's staff pursues this mission...
How did Heritage get to be 'Heritage', capital H?
While many of the Project 2025 proposals are inspired by Trump, they are being echoed by GOP rivals Ron DeSantis and Vivek Ramaswamy and are gaining prominence among other Republicans.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2025 (link)A coalition of far-right groups, led by the Heritage Foundation, is planning for the next Republican administration. Project 2025 has received considerable media attention for its $22 million budget, for its plans to expand presidential power over federal agencies, and for specific policies, like rolling back environmental protections.
Outside the courthouse, Jennifer Marshall of the Heritage Foundation conservative think tank said the case 'won't settle the marriage debate any more than Roe v. Wade settled the abortion debate,' referring to the court's 1973 ruling legalizing abortion.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Academics | |
| People | |
| Other | |
