This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Stub sorting This template is maintained byWikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit theproject page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting

I think I preferred this without the archive links; it made it a little less cluttered. I don't know why it was changed unilaterally though. Anyone else have any thoughts?Alai19:56, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think I sort of do, too. But I wasn't sure if there was a collection of those links anywhere else. Plus it was unilateral, as you say. So I reverted it.

Maybe if the archive link was on the same line as the main page in some way (a hyperlinked 'A' perhaps?) then that would be a bit of a bridge between the two. --TheParanoidOne20:30, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not a bad idea. And/or, make sure the archives links are in a fairly consistent place near the top at each of the corresponding discussion page.Alai22:15, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the link to the substubs, which is now only of historical interest. If anybody feels it is still needed feel free to revert. --Valentinian01:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a link to the FULL list of stubs. I am annoyed everytime I come to this page that I can't simply search the stubs. It is currently rather difficult to findTemplate:WSS to the average person.RWV05:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]