This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Food and drink This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage offood anddrink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, selecthere Here are some tasks you can do forWikiProject Food and drink: Help bring theseTop Importance articles currentlyB Status or below up toGA status:Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom),Beef,Bread,Curry,Drink,Food,Ham and eggs,Soy sauce,Sushi,Yogurt Bring theseTop Importance articles currently atGA status up toFA status:Beer,French cuisine,Sugar Bring theseHigh Importance articles currently atGA status up toFA status:Apple,Burger King,Fish Participate in project-relateddeletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please reviewWP:Trivia andWP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the{{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,select here. Provide photographs and images forCategory:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project'sAssessment task force. List anyproject ideas in this section Note: These lists aretranscluded from the project's tasks pages. Turkey This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofTurkey andrelated topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey

This template was considered formerging withTemplate:Turkish cuisine on11 December 2013. The result ofthe discussion was "merge".

I have reverted the absolutely screaming colour scheme. I don't object to rather soft colours, but this scheme will be distracting from the contents in the article itself.The Banner talk21:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then change it to darker red. Do not remove all the red color.It is Turkish cuisine and it has to have red and white.KazekageTR (talk)14:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

yes, the addition of spurious colours should be discussed first.Frietjes (talk)16:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See the talkpage ofTemplate:Turkish cuisine...The Banner talk18:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

see the discussion here. that discussion is for the sidebar, not the navbox.Frietjes (talk)18:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is the same colour issue. I hoped you noticed that.The Banner talk18:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

no, it's not the same issue, seeTemplate:Cuisine of Cyprus andwp:deviations.Frietjes (talk)18:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

see the foot ofMangal (barbecue), no reason for one to be coloured and the other not.Frietjes (talk)18:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well Frietjes, it is allowed to put colors into templates after it has been approved or/after it has been disgussed. You may put some color to other template, if the color is O.K. for sure.

perWP:BRD, there is no problem with adding them, and there is also no problem with reverting the addition, then discussing it. however,WP:BRD does not mean BRRRRR with no D. also, copying an entire thread is offensive, since it implies that I somehow did not read the thread on the other talk page, which was about a sidebar not a navbox.Frietjes (talk)19:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree, we don't need the extra colours. I didn't see any other cuisine navboxes using colouring, so I reverted it back to its original state. Thanks!Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)01:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And again the prior discussion, although mainly done on the now merged "Template talk:Turkish cuisine" is bluntly ignored. There was discussion, but ms. Frietjes decided to ignore that but TfD that template. But even now, the discussion is ignored asWP:IDONTLIKEIT. Please restore the colours as discussed in the discussion below that ms. Friets so discretelydeleted when it turned out that there was prior discussion about the colour schemeat both templates but centralised at the other template. Two discussion about one colour scheme used on two near identical templates, although preferred by ms. Frietjes, is an utter waste of time...The Banner talk02:21, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to use the same colour scheme as used atTemplate:Turkish cuisine, as discussed earlier there. A copy of the discussion is added here under the header "For ms. Frietjes".The Banner talk18:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that one of the two templates be deleted as they are entirely redundant. or we should go back to the uncoloured version which has been used for years perWP:BRD andwp:deviations. I also propose you stop calling me 'Mr' since that is not my gender.Frietjes (talk)19:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Frietjes, we can make a discussion about deleting this template, as the other one is pretty useful. On the talk page of theTemplate:Turkish cuisine there is a discussion about it too. I propose a voting or sth. like that.KazekageTR (talk)21:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If one should choose between the two templates, I would keep this one (navbarCuisine of Turkey) and delete the other one (infoboxTurkish cuisine). I find the other template really very disturbing. Just look at thePilaf page! All those infobox/sidebar templates (Turkish cuisine, Indian cuisine, Iranian cuisine) are cluttering up the page. Normally one should have no more than one infobox on a single page (as pointed out in the template documentation), but there there are four! If one continues this way, one would also add theGreek cuisine sidebar there etc. I see only one place where theTurkish cuisine infobox is reasonably located: the pageTurkish cuisine. On all other pages the navbar is much more appropriate. It does not disturb reading the article about a particular dish, while someone interested in other turkish dishes may find the links at the bottom.My proposal is thus: Remove the infobox from all pages except perhaps the pageTurkish cuisine. Use this navbar on all other relevant pages.Off-shell (talk)21:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was pointed in this direction (User talk:Anna Frodesiak#Turkish cuisine template). I'd like to just be a fly on the wall, if that's okay. If things go pear-shaped, I'll speak up.Anna Frodesiak (talk)00:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Template-Class Food and drink pages
• NA-importance Food and drink pages
• WikiProject Food and drink articles
• Template-Class Turkey pages
• NA-importance Turkey pages
• All WikiProject Turkey pages