Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Template talk:Supertall skyscrapers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconSkyscrapers
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope ofWikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate toskyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper
iconThis template was considered fordeletion on2006 November 25. The result ofthe discussion was "keep but fix/cleanup".

Under construction

[edit]

The Under construction section is much longer than the existing structures. Someone really needs to weed many of those out.Reywas92Talk21:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't it be better just to create a separate template for under construction supertalls?Rai-me05:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have gone through all of the supposedly under-constructions and removed all of the supertalls that aren't onthis CTBUH list or otherwise didn't have any SkyscraperPage or Emporis entries or other reliable sources stating that the subject was u/c. I also foundthis helpful to determine which supertalls were only proposed, however I did not go through theproposed skyscrapers template for the following reasons:
  • I believe that by removing the non under-construction supertalls from this template, I have far from fixed it. By taking a look at the first link I have supplied above, you'll see there arefar more supertall skyscrapers classified by the CTBUH that don't even have a Wikipedia article, let alone a place in this template.
  • The same applies for the second link I supplied (proposed supertalls).
  • Within a few years, the number of supertall skyscrapers being built will have doubled
Therefore, I propose that the under construction section (along with the construction suspended section) of this template be completely scrapped, just leaving the completed and former sections.

Of course, there will be so many more proposed buildings in the next few years, it would be impossible to keep up. In my opinion, the newly proposed buildings in the other template should be removed, just leaving the cancelled and visions.timsdad(talk)10:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still-Proposed Buildings

[edit]

The Trans National Place was found in the under construction template, but when I visited the article, it stated that the construction for the building was scheduled to begin in 2008!! I think someone should move this back into the proposed supertall skyscrapers section.

You are correct; I have removed it.Rai-me05:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetical order: "The" under "T" or the next word?

[edit]

When Hydrogen Iodide moved Burj Dubai Lake Hotel to The Address, I noticed that entries that began with "the" were alphabetized under "T." Isn't it customary for entries that begin with "the" to be alphabetized by the next word? In other words, should "The Address" and "The Marina Torch" be alphabetized as "Address" and "Marina Torch," respectively?Leitmanp (talk |contributions)21:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What Country?

[edit]

Could the countries of the said buildings be added to the list so we know where abouts they are? —Precedingunsigned comment added by79.69.190.34 (talk)19:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this template is meant only to list the tallest buildings and not the countries within which those buildings are located. If you want to see the country, you should select the the building and read about it on their respective articles.Leitmanp (talk |contributions)22:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Wordl Trade Ceter is the best history because yes—Precedingunsigned comment added by201.68.57.120 (talk)22:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

City of Capitals

[edit]

Doesn't this deserve a mention somewhere?131.111.184.95 (talk)00:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Timsdad!—Precedingunsigned comment added by131.111.184.95 (talk)01:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Middle East is in Asia!

[edit]

Not to be pedantic (well, OK just a little bit!) but, why is there a category called "Middle East" and another one called "Asia"? Shouldn't these 2 categories be merged into just one -- "Asia"? /geography Nazi—Precedingunsigned comment added by68.103.79.151 (talk)20:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template needs revising

[edit]

Many building in here no longer fit in the section of the template they are in. For example thePentominium under the under construction section but is now on hold, or theCity Hall and City Duma is under the on hold section but is now cancelled and should be switched to the Supertall Proposed Skyscrapers template under the cancelled section. There are also building in this template that should be under the Supertall Proposed skyscrapers template since they are only proposed and constrution has yet to begin. The Supertall Proposed skyscrapers template also likely needs revision.Stormchaser89 (talk) 6:46, 28 August 2011 (US Central)

Supertall definition

[edit]

"supertall" skyscrapers need a definition, clear, in the template. I know a lot of tall skyscrapers and very tall skyscrapers and I dont know is I must paste those here or not, we need a size standard, 100 Metres? 200 metres? 600 meteres? what is the minimun?--Feroang (talk)02:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The definition of supertall is 300 meters or higher.Stormchaser89 (talk) 4:10pm, 1 October 2012 (US Central)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 July 2020

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

The template is woefully out of date, most notably the UAE section. To elaborate, here are my proposed changes:

Move from "Under construction" to "completed" –DAMAC Residenze (completed 2018),The Address Boulevard (completed 2017),Marina 101 (completed 2017).Move from "Under construction" to "construction delayed or suspended" –Dubai Pearl,Pentominium,Marina 106.

As for supertall towers currently under construction in the UAE, there are a few, but none have Wikipedia articles. They are, in decreasing order of height: Ciel Tower (366 metres), Il Primo Tower 1 (356 meters), Uptown Tower 2 (340 meters), Grande (338 meters), AMA Tower (333 Meters), One Za'abeel (330 meters), Adventz Tower (328 meters), Al Wasl Tower (302 meters) and Jumeirah Gate (303 meters).

Additionally, every single tower listed in the India section is also currently either on hold or cancelled. There are no towers in India taller than 300 meters that are actively being constructed at the moment.

Jeddah Tower in Saudi Arabia has also been on hold since early 2018. Diamond Tower in the same city doesn't appear to have seen construction since about then either, and is classed as On Hold by Skyscrapercity.

As for South Korea, the three LCT towers are all completed, in November 2019. The three tower links all lead to the same article, so it might be better to just list the whole complex (Haeundae LCT The Sharp) in the template. The remaining tower, Parc1 Tower, is so close to completion as of this writing that you might as well move that one to Completed as well.

The China section is a little too unwieldy to describe here. I hope to one day get enough editing access and time to have a proper deep dive into it and sort out the completed and postponed towers, of which there are quite a few.Codraroll (talk) 22:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Codraroll (talk)22:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done: I've started by movingMarina 101 andAddress Boulevard, because their articles both have sources for their respective completion.DAMAC Residenze seems to have no source for its completion in its own article, so it'd be best if you find aWP:RS for that. I haven't looked at any others yet, but I think they should be treated the same way: if they have a source already, I'll move them, otherwise, see if you can find one (and add it to the article, while you're at it). Regarding youruser rights, you should only need six more edits (I think, from looking at your contribs) to become autoconfirmed yourself, at which point you'll be able to both edit this template and create articles for all the skyscrapers that still need some.Rummskartoffel (talk)23:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Partly done: I've movedDubai Pearl as well now.Pentominium was already in "delayed or suspended", but its article needs updating according to a maintenance template, which might make for another potential project for you. I haven't movedMarina 106, because its current status appears to be unsourced.Rummskartoffel (talk)23:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Partly done: I've movedPalais Royale, Mumbai andWorld One; all the other Indian ones appear to have no sources for their status.Rummskartoffel (talk)00:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Partly done: I've moved bothJeddah Tower andDiamond Tower (Jeddah) and edited the latter's article accordingly.Rummskartoffel (talk)10:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Partly done: I've now movedHaeundae LCT The Sharp as well. I thinkParc1 Tower should be moved once it's finished. That's all I'm gonna do for now, but you can always reactivate the edit request and someone will come along and take a look.Rummskartoffel (talk)10:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2021

[edit]

Varso Tower is currently (as of 20th of March 2021) under construction in Warsaw, Poland. It's scheduled to be finished around the end of 2021.

Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2023

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

change 1 Manhattan Westto One Manhattan Westwhich is the name of the article itself2603:7000:4BF0:620:3065:D92:8E53:B7AF (talk)18:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Note: While One Manhattan is indeed the name of the article (assuming that it's the common name), such a change would cause "1 Manhattan" (also used and a redirect) to be pushed down the list.M.Bitton (talk)22:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now: please establish aconsensus for this alterationbefore using the{{Edit semi-protected}} template.-Lemonaka00:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: Please do not simply re-open the request when it has been closed for good reason. Establish consensus, ensure that the criteria atWP:EDITXY are being met, then re-open it if appropriate.Actualcpscm (talk)17:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Supertall_skyscrapers&oldid=1255138314"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp