This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Law This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for thelegal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Politics This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpolitics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics

I am not a heavy wikimedia editor, but I believe this template has been edited by someone from the Chinese Ministry of Propaganda. There is absolutely no academic basis for calling the Chinese system a separation of powers. This is a false equivalency between a genuine separation of powers and the internal divisions that the communist party, of it's own volition, creates in its own power structure. I suggest a serious edit, undertaken by an editor.97.105.199.198 (talk)16:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it should be therePokedora (talk)14:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Template-Class law pages
• NA-importance law pages
• WikiProject Law articles
• Template-Class politics pages
• NA-importance politics pages
• WikiProject Politics articles