Template talk:Scientology
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theScientology template. |
|
Archives:1Auto-archiving period:3 months  |
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
If there was a Dianetics template, then it would obviously fit more there. But I think it also fits here... This is the latest news about this from their own website:http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/National_News_2/article_9651.shtml
http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/National_News_2/article_8648.shtml
http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/Minister_Louis_Farrakhan_9/article_7648.shtml
They have over 1055 "Nation of Islam" Auditors now and have apparently done 82 thousand hours of auditing. Scary, but this is the fact, they do deserve to be placed here now. They are officially connected(and have been publically since 2010, privately since 2006). It's totally freaky that one of the most racist Negro organisations in existence has suddenly embraced Dianetics and formed an alliance with the Church, but it IS the fact.Colliric (talk)02:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Please add new articleScientology in the Netherlands to Group 7. Thanks.2A00:23EE:19C8:BA81:48C:2DFF:FEC5:9914 (talk)19:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DoneXan747 (talk)22:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This template is getting too large and unwieldy. I have broken out the properties section into its own template,{{Scientology properties}}. That one should be used for every one of the properties rather than using{{Scientology}}.
I have left a select few in this template, positioned subordinate to the organization it houses. Those articles should each have{{Scientology properties}} at the bottom. The occasional few might also have{{Scientology}}if and only if the content of that article has more than minor content about Scientology (such as its purchase).
The Church of Scientology has bought several properties and turned them into museums, and some editors are creating articles about thosebuildings (not really about Scientology). Those do not need to clutter up this nav-template, but go ahead and add them to{{Scientology properties}} if they have a standalone article.
▶ I am Grorp ◀09:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Boud: To respond to your edit summary questionno cases in the 2010s and 2020s?
, I point you toScientology and law § Others where there are 7 more cases mentioned from 2010s/2020s. There are so many on the litigation sublist in this template (and I only see it getting longer) that we should probably create a newTemplate:Scientology litigation to break out just the litigation articles, and leave only a fewkey cases inTemplate:Scientology. What do you think? ▶ I am Grorp ◀22:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
