This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Finance & Investment This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related toFinance andInvestment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment Crime and Criminal Biography This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcrime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related

An anonymous user added the online auction site Swoopo to this template. Swoopo is certainly controversial, possibly illegal in some jurisdictions, and I personally believe that their business model is questionable, but I'm not sure it even qualifies as a confidence trick (it's more akin to gambling). It is certainly not what I would consider a notable confidence trick, and therefore should not be in this template. I am going to remove it.RandyKaelber (talk)20:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the user's anonymous status relevant?129.81.90.56 (talk)03:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. For the same reason, I've removedBidding fee auction (aka "bidding fee scheme") from the list.White 720 (talk)16:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion atTalk:Sathya Sai Baba#Category:Confidence tricksters about havingSathya Sai Baba in this template (and a related category). --Closeapple (talk)03:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On those grounds I've removedSathya Sai Baba from here again: if consensus is that he belongs in the Confidence tricksters category then this can be revisited. In the meantime, it seems that listing him here as a notable con artist without such consensus is a BLP concern. -Bilby (talk)04:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be a separate template. To tie with this, "con artist" should be a separate article fromconfidence trick.--Penbat (talk)10:47, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added Groupon as a Ponzi or pyramid scheme, based on article athttp://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/groupon-groupon-ipo-tech-stocks-linked/6/3/2011/id/34936. The article explains that, according to IPO financial disclosure requirements, the finances of the company resemble a ponzi scheme. However, the company publicly discloses the relevant facts, which may or may not make it an actual ponzi scheme. Does disclosure make it not a ponzi scheme?— Precedingunsigned comment added by67.207.34.229 (talk)04:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted. You can open a discussion about adding it to theGroupon article, but it's not widely considered a scam and confidence trick and does not merit a place on the template until it does.Jokestress (talk)04:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Template-Class Finance & Investment pages
• NA-importance Finance & Investment pages
• WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
• Template-Class Crime-related pages
• NA-importance Crime-related pages
• WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles