This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
This page is within the scope ofWikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard ofredirects and theircategorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join thediscussion and see a list of open tasks. Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects. This banner isnot designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects andalmost never on the talk pages ofmainspace redirects. For more information see thetemplate documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect
It should be noted that this Rcat uses the{{Redirect template}} template, which seems to have some restrictions to its usage that may impact this template. For example, I tried to use that template's "printworthy=no" parameter to automatically add the Rcat to theTemplates for unprintworthy redirects category. That didn't work, so I reverted my edits and made an adjustment to the{{Redirect template/doc}} page. The bottom line is that I cannot tell if the unnamed parameter is actually working properly to sort these redirects correctly inCategory:Redirects from ATC codes, since the redirects are actually titled with the same code as in the unnamed parameter. This leads to the question as to why the unnamed parameter is even required, but I will leave that to another day. If another editor finds that inclusion of the unnamed parameter inside the{{Redirect template}} templates breaks something, then feel free to eliminate it, as it doesn't seem to actually do anything important. I could be wrong about that, though. – PIE ( CLIMAX ) 06:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just to note it, the unnamed sort parameteris necessary in order to be able to use the category TOC on these alpha-numeric codes; otherwise these redirects would all be listed under letter "A" (for "ATC code Xnnn") and not under their actual, sorted codes. Same goes for{{R from ATCvet code}}. So far, there does not appear to be any problem with the#if: parser within template{{Redirect template}}. – Paine11:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]