This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to thePrehistoric caves template.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help. Assume good faith Be polite andavoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seekdispute resolution if needed

Archives:1Auto-archiving period:3 months

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
Archaeology This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofArchaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology

This template was edited to contain a total or partialtranslation ofModèle:Palette Grottes ornées from theFrench Wikipedia. Consult thehistory of the original page to see a list of its authors.(This notice applies toversion 731345284 and subsequent versions of this page.)

This template was considered fordeletion on2016 September 20. The result ofthe discussion was "Kept".

Hi! Is it really necessary to separate Jersey from the UK? We better keep it as compact as possible. ATBWikirictor (talk)12:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Technically Jersey isn't part of the UK. My instinct would be to merge them and risk the ire of the Islanders, though...Joe Roe (talk)13:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the only relevance of modern states to the subject is their custody of the sites, their flags seem to me of dubious value: the country names ought to be enough. Moreover, one concern being expressed at TfD is the template’s size, and I expect removing the graphics would make it look considerably smaller and less imposing. See alsoMOS:FLAG.—Odysseus147906:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AgreeWikirictor (talk)08:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely, they should go.Doug Wellertalk18:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Agreed.Joe Roe (talk)23:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SeeWikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Skysmith's list of missing articles/Archaeology and Paleontology#Caves (kudos toSkysmith) for a list of cave sites that might be created and added to this template. – Joe (talk)12:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! ATBWikirictor (talk)14:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! All articles of the Europe section have an info-box now - and the Template:Prehistoric caves, of course. If i missed something, let me know, please. I used theAncient Site box, because it has the best parameters and looks better (i hate the dirt-brown background on top of theCave info-box), but I didn't replace the existing info-boxes. There are a few caves left in Spain, where i should add the UNESCO info, though. However....i move on to Asia now. All the bestWikirictor11:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BTW - i generated coordinates withTHIS tool. All the bestWikirictor11:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the link toCueva de las Manos be titled as such in the template, instead of being shown as "Las Manos" as it's currently presented?Tyrone Madera (talk)17:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've went ahead and made the change from "Las Manos" to "Cueva de las Manos"Tyrone Madera (talk)17:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone with experience with editing the template addLos Toldos (Santa Cruz) to the list? Thanks!Tyrone Madera (talk)17:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template-Class Archaeology pages
• NA-importance Archaeology pages
• Pages translated from French Wikipedia