Template talk:Philosophy of religion
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IsPlantinga's free will defense notable enough to be included in this template?Gabbe (talk)18:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have added some Russian philosophers represents ofRussian religious philosophy who contributed tophilosophy of religion.--Vojvodaeplease be free to write :)21:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could or ShouldNew Thought be included in this Template?66.108.86.141 (talk)03:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Intelligent design is not mentioned once in the mainPhilosophy of religion article, so I would question whether it merits inclusion as one of its core 'Concepts'.HrafnTalkStalk(P)07:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Inside the section on 'The Problem of Evil', addAlvin Plantinga's free-will defense, probably the most accepted response and far worthier of a place than Augustine's answer.86.179.170.16 (talk)22:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please providereliable sources that support the change you want to be made. If that response is the most accepted, please create a well sourced article about it. As it stands now, Augustine's answer has an article, while this doesn't.DannyS712 (talk)23:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
