This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofJapan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like toparticipate, please visit theproject page, where you can join the project, participate inrelevant discussions, and seelists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofEnergy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofbusiness articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
But I'm going to stop for a number of reasons, and this brings up some big-picture issues that I need others to work with me on. Firstly, we already have the link to the list of reactors in the template. Second, I really want to seeNuclear power in Japan become the one main end all be all article for this topic. I also want to minimize the standardized junk attached to all of these articles (look at an article for any U.S. plant and you'll see what I'm trying to avoid). In my view, these articles should contain:
A summary of the units at the site and
Any notable facts about the plant available
inter-wiki links are, of course, a must. Stub templates are questionable (how much are thesereally going to expand), but this Japan reactor template I think is good. See also stuff and external links are probably best left to themain page ofNuclear power in Japan I think. What other comments do people have to make about the creation of these articles? -Theanphibian(talk •contribs)06:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]