This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
Caucasia (inactive) This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to beinactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia

Ubykh wasn´t anAdyghe dialect. Besides,West Adyghe/West Circassian is awikt:misnomer for the Adyghe language.89.173.36.108 (talk)07:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted some recent edits to this page, and explained myself inhere. The discussion concerns many articles, so I thought it would be a good idea to keep it central. I hereby invite everyone who is interested to join the discussion onTalk:Northwest Caucasian languages. Thank you

Vito Genovese13:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vito Genovese: Someone has redirected the page and merged the box with a newer navbox including Northeast Caucasian and Kartvelian. While I agree with the idea of having a joint North Caucasian Languages navbox, Kartvelian is a completely separate language family and shouldn't be clumped together based on geographic grounds. That can be done for navboxes pertaining to ethnicity or geography, but not when it comes to language families. That seems arbitrary and misleading.DA1 (talk)01:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention if you go by geography, you would have to add Armenian and Turkic languages as well.DA1 (talk)10:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since we already haveTemplate:Languages of the Caucasus, I'd simply revert,@DA1:.

Vito Genovese16:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vito Genovese Then please do so. I think merging Northwest and Northeast into a single navbox would be a good idea too. Anyone tries to get geographic, we can point them to the above box you referenced.DA1 (talk)15:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DA1:: Well, I fail to see the benefit of merging two independent language families into a single navbox, but it can of course be discussed. I am afraid I am swamped nowadays, so I won't be able to take part in long discussions that usually come with reverts, which is why I refrain from reverting at this point. Let the record show, though, that I do support this action. Any particular reason why you don't want to do it yourself?

Vito Genovese07:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vito Genovese: Okay I'll do it. 'North Caucasian' is a proposed language family as well, with its own WP page that can be linked, so it's not that left-field to do.DA1 (talk)09:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to redirectTemplate:Northeast Caucasian languages to this template usingmerge guidelines, although its contents have already been copied to here. I'm doing this because ofUser:DA1's explanation from the successful2 April move request; since the last move, this template has been a combination of the Template:NECL and the old Template:NWCL, and so having Template:NECL is redundant and should be made into a redirect of this template (NCL).

From what I understand, the last move had to be done in order to fix some edit history issues from past move switches, even if what DA1 requested was technically not just a move but a merger of templates NECL and NWCL. I will update with a comment after I've completed the merge. —Neutral0814 (talk)19:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —Neutral0814 (talk)20:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted perrequest on my talk. –wbm1058 (talk)21:52, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]