Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Template talk:Norse paganism footer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconNorse history and culture
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope ofWikiProject Norse history and culture, aWikiProject related to all activities of theNorthGermanic peoples, both inScandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of theKalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture
WikiProject iconReligion:New religious movements
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope ofWikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles onReligion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help usassess and improve articles togood and1.0 standards, or visit thewikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Taskforce icon
This template is supported byNew religious movements work group.

Weapons, armor, and tools/objects

[edit]

Been going through the norse mythology articles and realized it's much harder to look up these things than it should be, would it be possible to get some listings added here?12.73.194.130 (talk)05:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Germanic mythology

[edit]

This template is really cool. However the problem is that gods likeThor andFreya are not only Norse but Germanic mythology as well. Somehow a better solution needs to be found to reflect that as well, because creating two separate templates would be a bit tedious and could clutter articles... any solutions?Gryffindor23:50, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, "Germanic" refers to all Teutonic peoples, with "Continental German" referring to those specifically on the European continent. Thus, "Germanic" would include the Germans, Frisians, Anglo-Saxons, Norse, Franks, Vandals, Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Danes, Lombards, and so forth... So I think that simply renaming the template to "Germanic Heathenry would be the solution.Ƿōdenhelm (talk)05:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Later influence

[edit]

Should "Later influence" link toNorse mythological influences on later literature or toNorse mythology in popular culture?Sigo22:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Norse Mythology > Germanic Heathenry

[edit]

I'm the one who made the change, and I did it primarily for better technical accuracy. The current title would imply that the religion was not only:

  • Unique to the ancient Norse, but also;
  • Is no longer practiced(per use of the term "mythology").

And in all truthfulness, neither of these are true. "Germanic" is an umbrella term, used to cover all non-Celtic/Gaelic, non-Slavic, non-Greco/Roman peoples of ancient Europe. These people include the Anglo-Saxons/English, the Norse (Scandinavians), the continental Germans (Saxons, Alemanni, Ostrogoths, Visigoths), the Vandals of northern Africa, the Dutch, Frisians, and so forth.

During ancient times, this faith applied toall of these peoples, over various periods of time.

Next, the term "mythology" is inaccurate today, due to the reconstructionist revival movements who are intent on reviving the ancient faith... which includes the biggest label name currently in use by practicing members, "Ásatrú." And as a final point for using "Heathenry," this was a genuine ancient term, as theOld English word for a practicing member washǣðen. I'm a Heathen, and I speak Old English. I know what I'm talking about.

I'll leave the title as it is for now, in order to give people enough time to see my message about it on this discussion page. The faith is not unique to the Norse only (most people only interpret it that way, due to the fact that mostwritten sources come from the Norse and Icelanders), but it being labeled as(unpracticed) "mythology" is also inaccurate. Thisis an encyclopedia... let's keep things accurate.

Ƿōdenhelm (talk)03:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps a further subdivision of the Aesir and Vanir?

[edit]

This might be helpful for people looking for this information—Precedingunsigned comment added by24.190.34.219 (talk)20:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After the Æsir-Vanir war, the Vanir are also considered a part of the Æsir. Going toVanir (which I've rewritten from scratch and am in the process of expanding) will further explain the situation. For the purpose of this template, I don't think the distinction is necessary. We can't go into too much detail here. I'm currently debating a 'Vanir' template.:bloodofox: (talk)06:05, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how most of those deities called Vanir here are actually Vanir. Most of them are æsir or ásynjur. The only ones we know for certain to have been Vanir are Freyr, Freyja and their father, Njörður.—Precedingunsigned comment added byVegfarandi (talkcontribs)22:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now made this change, based on the texts and the considerable body of scholarship about the Æsir-Vanir war and the distinction between them. This distinction has also been called into question, but the grouping remains useful and it doesn't matter in that respect that it only has 3 confirmed members. I also think this is more appropriate than a separate Vanir template.Yngvadottir (talk)18:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated addition of "demons" to template

[edit]

Over (at least) the last several months, this template has been the target of the addition of "demons" and some other inaccurate tomfoolery. Please revert on sight. Thank you.:bloodofox: (talk)02:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Chainkill, 17 November 2010

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

In the list of the gods, Freyr is listed among the Aesir gods. He is of the Vanir gods, as is stated in the second paragraph of his entry on wikipedia. The peaceful, agrarian focused gods were Vanir deities, and the warlike, conquering deities were the first generation of the Aesir. (Subsequent generations of the Aesir produced more peaceful deities, such as Baldur, primarily because of intermarriages with the Vanir.)

Chainkill (talk)16:20, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the mythological timeline, theÆsir–Vanir War results in the semi-unification of these groups, with the Vanir being considered something of subgroup. Characterizing the Vanir as "peaceful, agrarian focused gods" is not correct; seeVanir.:bloodofox: (talk)23:29, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: per comment above. -Atmoz (talk)15:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Asatru or Germanic Neopaganism?

[edit]

In the template (at the bottom) "Asatru" is used, though that link links toGermanic Neopaganism. Would it not be appropriate to use Germanic Neopaganism instead in the template then? -Cilibinarii (talk)09:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Add to the template

[edit]

Could someone addLíf and Lífþrasir in the Others section of the template.— Precedingunsigned comment added by47.54.65.37 (talk)19:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Æsir and Ásynjur both link to Æsir

[edit]

I found that both Æsir and Ásynjur link to the article Æsir in the template, which confuses me. Is it supposed to be like that?99.199.50.44 (talk)04:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Balance between both sides

[edit]

TheValkyrie,Mimir (knowledge) are Vanir (it is believed that there arePriests, Bragdil andAstarus are known to side with them)

Balance between both sides

[edit]

TheValkyrie,Mimir (knowledge) are Vanir (it is believed that there arePriests, Bragdil andAstarus are known to side with them)--Blackinlaygold99999999999999999999999 (talk)03:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 March 2018

[edit]
Thisedit request toTemplate:Norse paganism topics has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

Add Myrkviðr, which already has a Wikipedia page, to the "other locations" area.67.2.179.187 (talk)15:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneEggishorn(talk)(contrib)17:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox

[edit]

Does anyone know how to transder the Navbox Norse Mythology uses (or get the code even). I want to use it, but I don't know how to get it. (218.215.22.243 (talk)13:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Thor's name

[edit]

I think Thor's name should be in english, like Odin's name is.Michael May II (talk)20:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heidr is not a location

[edit]

Heidr the völva was listed under "locations", i don't understand maybe its an mistake.LucySky (talk)10:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictions in the box

[edit]

There seems to be some disorganisation in the box, as exemplified by the Vanir-Aesir distinction above, but other more subtle ones are still present, like listing Laufey as a giantess while the article points out she was numbered among the ásynjur.177.47.49.23 (talk)18:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Norse_paganism_footer&oldid=1259717182"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp