| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
On 14 June 2007, IP editor202.51.76.234 deleted theMadan Puraskar Pustakalaya library from the "Culture" section of this template. TheMadan Puraskar Pustakalaya library was added to the template on 28 September 2006 byJoelr31 with the remark: "adding topics removed from main article". As I see it, this template is used as a topically organizedsee also reference for users on article related to Nepal. If the library is notable, which I do not know, then I see no reason why it shouldn't be in the template. If the library is not notable, then the appropriate procedure isAfD, not deletion from the template without discussion. On this restricted basis, I have restored the library to the template. Any editor challenging the notability of theMadan Puraskar Pustakalaya library is encourged to do so using theAfD procedure. --Bejnar14:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please update and resort this template with all the topics regarding Nepal. Widen this templates.— Precedingunsigned comment added byAchlochan (talk •contribs)15:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
| Thishelp request has been answered. If you need more help, you canask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on theiruser talk page, or consider visiting theTeahouse. |
I was shocked to find out that someone has made it so that this template automatically converts intoCategory:Colonial History of Nepal which is a completely nonsensical phrase. Suddenly, we have years old articles on a zillion different topics about Nepal all populating that ridiculous category. I suspect some registered editor might have been POV pushing, and it went unnoticed. Please fix this asap. Just look at that category page to see how ridiculous it all is.Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨20:06, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]