This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
Automobiles This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofautomobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile

Here's a prototype of a Mercedes model template, based onTemplate:BMW cars, which I based onTemplate:Ferrari vehicles. Numbers for new SL, CLK and SLK not known yet. It might well be best to take this all the way back to the 1950s. The new CL coupé has its own number, C215. Comments welcome. --Hotlorp 01:38, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Conclude Report about no economy ,bad performance Automotive engineer of 6 parts (The underground racing mechanicals know as without AE ME) in Mercedes Benz classes and Mercedes Benz classes include AMG, Brabus, Lorinser which mean ones failure in automobile thus forever.

1. Wider rear track than front track dimension chassis  : easy wrecked chassis ,the lowest traction ,extreme tail flick ,extreme slip,hardcore control in all speed and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

2. turbocharger (1-4 turbo per engine) intercooler petrol engines : unstable acceleration ,extreme wrecked engine parts ,torque horsepower overload ,and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

3. without rear fog lamp : easy electronic parts wrecked ,economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

4. CVT transmission : slow acceleration ,economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

5. Wider front track than rear track in below 10 mm dimension chassis with RWD ,AWD : medium traction ,tail flick,easy slip and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

6. Front track as same as rear track dimension chassis : medium traction ,medium tail flick ,easy slip ,power slide ,understeer and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

If over 1 of 6 parts,automobiles of economy use 1-3 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

From database MB— Precedingunsigned comment added by49.230.231.170 (talk)09:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conclude Report about no economy ,bad performance Automotive engineer of 6 parts (The underground racing mechanicals know as without AE ME) in Mercedes Benz classes and Mercedes Benz classes include AMG, Brabus, Lorinser which mean ones failure in automobile thus forever.

1. Wider rear track than front track dimension chassis  : easy wrecked chassis ,the lowest traction ,extreme tail flick ,extreme slip,hardcore control in all speed and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

2. turbocharger (1-4 turbo per engine) intercooler petrol engines : unstable acceleration ,extreme wrecked engine parts ,torque horsepower overload ,and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

3. without rear fog lamp : easy electronic parts wrecked ,economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

4. CVT transmission : slow acceleration ,economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

5. Wider front track than rear track in below 10 mm dimension chassis with RWD ,AWD : medium traction ,tail flick,easy slip and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

6. Front track as same as rear track dimension chassis : medium traction ,medium tail flick ,easy slip ,power slide ,understeer and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

If over 1 of 6 parts,automobiles of economy use 1-3 km/l ,below 1 km/l.— Precedingunsigned comment added by49.230.231.170 (talk)09:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conclude Report about no economy ,bad performance Automotive engineer of 6 parts (The underground racing mechanicals know as without AE ME) in Mercedes Benz classes and Mercedes Benz classes include AMG, Brabus, Lorinser and all brands which mean ones failure in automobile thus forever.

1. Wider rear track than front track dimension chassis  : easy wrecked chassis ,the lowest traction ,extreme tail flick ,extreme slip,hardcore control in all speed and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

2. turbocharger (1-4 turbo per engine) intercooler petrol engines : unstable acceleration ,extreme wrecked engine parts ,torque horsepower overload ,and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

3. without rear fog lamp : easy electronic parts wrecked ,economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

4. CVT transmission : slow acceleration ,economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

5. Wider front track than rear track in below 10 mm dimension chassis with RWD ,AWD : medium traction ,tail flick,easy slip and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

6. Front track as same as rear track dimension chassis : medium traction ,medium tail flick ,easy slip ,power slide ,understeer and economy as 1-5 km/l ,below 1 km/l.

If over 1 of 6 parts,automobiles of economy use 1-3 km/l ,below 1 km/l.— Precedingunsigned comment added by49.230.231.170 (talk)09:13, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why Smart cars are in the list, I've changed it to A-Class. Feel free to revert if I'm wrong, but please state why here.Mat-C12:20, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Was something horrible... :(*) hahaha --Zzzzzzus13:40, 26 October 2005 (UTC)zzzzzzus[reply]

Mercedes-Benz W202,Mercedes-Benz W203 andMercedes-Benz W204 were redirected to the C-Class article, following adeletion discussion. You may want to reorganize this template and related articles in light of that decision. --nae'blis_(talk)19:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The maybach is included while it's not sale under the Mercedes brand. Arguably, it can be included to have a complete overview of Daimler Benz's cars, but then smart should be included too. --84.103.33.11922:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't categorizing the SLR as asupercar (new category in this table) rather than yet another coupé make more sense? Compare theR8 in the Audi template or even theZ8 in the BMW template.The Seventh Taylor (talk)21:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

completely.. to classify it as a coupe is really weirdSomatosis (talk)03:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DoneThe Seventh Taylor (talk)15:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"It is called ML and the page it links to is a page for ML. An M-Class does not exist" according toUser:Andrew Nutter.

Oh yes, it does, if we can trust the company itself to be a reliable source for this. SeeMercedes Benz M-Class page.The Seventh Taylor (talk)07:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In streamlining,SLC should fall under Large coupe, preceding C126 as it was manufactired from 1971 to 1981 being replaced by C126 - SEC.In that period, large coupe was based on SL chassis (hence SL-C) rather than on S as with previous W112 Coupe and later W126 Coupe.

SL-C is longer by 12" (approximately) than SL, it is a full 2+2 seater, the whole range is dubbed C107 (opposed to R107 - SL).—Precedingunsigned comment added by41.241.220.21 (talk)18:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about updating the template so that the time frame would be till 2015 like theBMW template?Abdallah (talk)20:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that it is soon going to be time to split the Benz timeline into one more section. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk)12:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no any missing articles till 2015 there is no need to extend it. And yep next time it needs maybe splitting to new time frame. -->Typ932^T·C15:52, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This timeline is large compared to most vehicle brand timelines. I suggest that it be split into a car timeline and a light truck (van and suv) timeline such as the Ford, Chevrolet, and Dodge/Ram timelines.216.134.241.196 (talk)01:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Mr.choppers | ✎ 02:52, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all,
I think this template has some problems with scope. The template is called "Mercedes-Benz vehicles", but it doesn't include all Mercedes vehicles - buses and trucks are left out. On the other hand, the header row says "Mercedes-Benz road car timeline, 1990s–present" but the template covers more than just cars. So, what should we do?

• Cut down the template so that it only covers cars. Vans could, perhaps, be put in a different template.
• Rename the template, and change the header row, so that they reflect what's currently in the template.
• Add other Mercedes-Benz vehicles that are currently excluded.

Or something else?bobrayner (talk)19:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Template-Class Automobile pages
• NA-importance Automobile pages