| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This template was way too big and had too much detail on team membership and a current storyline. With that removed, this is a great template. Removal follows previous discussions that have led to the deletion of membership-based templates. --Chris Griswold (☎☓)19:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We have 3 sections for former divisions (Historical, Defunct Imprints, Defunct Lines) and 2 for current divisions (Current Imprints, Current Lines). It's less precise but I think "Current Divisions" and "Former Divisions" would simplify navigation. Thoughts?RevelationDirect (talk)15:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What's the difference in these categories?Argento Surfer (talk)18:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think theOHOTMU and theOfficial Marvel Index should get an entry in this template cause I see them as essential articles regarding secondary literature about Marvel Comics characters and comic books. Maybe under "Related"?
BTW: Are theMarvel Books not an adaptation of the stories/characters of Marvel Comics into book format? Shouldn't the entry then consequently be listed under "Adaptations"? -Weapon X(talk,contribs)
18:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Punisher: The Platoon just finished publication in 2018 and was released under the MAX imprint.184.178.219.137 (talk)20:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Let's do it for simplicity's sake as Marvel comics is a division anyway. All the information should remain intact.24.126.30.250 (talk)06:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]