| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
If anyone wanted to find which aircraft were produced by a particular manufacturer would they really look at this template on the off-chance that the manufacturer they're interested in is listed here ? - surely they'd look at either the article for the manufacturer or the appropriate category. Similarly what's so special about theConnie,Sweden andImperial Airways that they get a mention here. This template doesn't show all lists of aircraft (e.g. the "List of ... variants" articles). The articles linked are a mix of list articles and non-list articles. Lots of lists that appear against "Civil aircraft" are mil+civ.There are even links that are piped to something different to what it says in the template (e.g. the last link is not to an article about a specific conflict). In short it's a mess. I propose that the vast majority of this template (apart from the "By name" section which may have a purpose) be removed.DexDor (talk)19:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible that the military aircraft are sorted by type as the civil aircraft.Mike117711 (talk)20:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wondering why these are in there when the company has a page that can be linked to?NiD.29 (talk)20:49, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]