| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theLiberalism sidebar template. |
|
| Archives:1Auto-archiving period:3 months |
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Archives | |
| |
This page has archives. Sections older than90 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3. |
Why exactly does the Liberalism template include all those "Other ideologies outside the series"? Wouldn't it be a better idea to create a separate Socialism series, a Conservatism series, etc.?-Mihnea Tudoreanu
This template includes many articles that have more to do with politics in general than liberalism in particular. I'm talking about the "middle section": Democracy, Freedom (political), Individual, Liberal democracy, Rule of law, Utilitarianism. The only one that really belongs there is liberal democracy. All the others are shared by liberalismand a wide variety of other ideologies. A better place for them would beTemplate:Politics. --Mihnea Tudoreanu 12:09, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I would prefer to delete the articles Classical liberalism, Green liberalism, Individualism, New liberalism, Neoliberalism, Small-l liberal, Social liberalism and to concentrate the template to the main articles about or on liberalism. In the main article Liberalism there are links to the articles I would like to delete from the template. --Gangulf 12:58, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I am doubting about what to do with small-l-liberal
Note: for the unfamiliar, above section are for votes, pls discuss below.
Just because blue is used by Democrats in the United States (who I don't think even know what liberalism means) does not mean it the rest of the world is any more valid. And did you know, that East Timor and Philippines are not located in Europe? ("especially the christian democrats in Europe...")
SeeIdeology#Political_ideologies –Kaihsu 19:32, 2005 May 16 (UTC)