Template talk:Islam topics
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template was nominated fordeletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theIslam topics template. |
|
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
the template looks pretty much like a replica ofTemplate:Islam with added sections fromTemplate:Fiqh. is there a reason it's not made redundant by these pre-existing templates?ITAQALLAH11:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Itaqallah, you said in your edit summary, concur, we don't. but this is something time-restricted and not a significant part of Muslim life/culture. if you believe it is, please substantiate it on the talk page.
Firstly, how is it "time-restricted? Secondly, reguardless of whether it is a significant part of much of muslim life/culture today, it was so in the past, even as far back as the time of Muhammad, so in that sense, I think it is very relevant.YahelGuhan19:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why? I don't immediately seewhy this template is protected (especially sinceTemplate:Islam is not), but could someone 1.) unprotect it, 2.) avoid the redirect forwomen and Islam towomen in Islam, or 3.) both? I will not be watching this, so please post on my talk if I am needed. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯06:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The link in this template toShi'a Islam redirects toShia Islam. Because of this, the link is not "black" when viewing the template from theShia Islam. Not a big deal, but something I usually like to fix. Thanks.DavidRF (talk)15:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi would you be able to please change Islam by country (at the Islam and culture section) to List of countries by Muslim population but state as: Muslim demographics, thanks.HaireDunya (talk)18:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
{{editprotected}} i would like you to add the salafi/wahhabi and quran-only (or quranist) to the list of denominations please
-92.24.17.248 (talk)23:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(reposted)
the purple "islam topics" box has only sunni, shia, ibadi, sufi listed as denominations
i would like you to add quran-only (otherwise called quranists) and salafi to these other 4 please—Precedingunsigned comment added byJigglyfidders (talk •contribs) 00:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
{{Editprotected}} hi, under the islam denominations template could you add Quranistshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qur%27an_alone
Done — Martin(MSGJ · talk)17:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]{{Editprotected}} hi, under the islam denominations template, could you add Kalami sect please?Kalam— Precedingunsigned comment added byJigglyfidders (talk •contribs)
{{Editprotected}} hi, under the islam denominations template could you add thesalafi sect please?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SalafiJigglyfidders (talk)11:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{Editprotected}} hi, Sufi IS a denomination. in the english language, a denomination means; "A religious denomination is a subgroup within a religion that operates under a common name, tradition, and identity." Sufis obviously fall within this category
however the Islam page claims Sufi is NOT a denomination.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam#Sufism could somebody fix that please?Jigglyfidders (talk)00:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{Editprotected}} hi,kalam with the branchesMurji'ah andMu'tazili should have a separate heading and branch since they have different laws and different theologiesthey are currently grouped together under sunni denomination even though most sunni scholars reject them as committing bid'ah
Since i'm not getting any response, reply or feedback from other editors, could someone group them as a separate denomination for me please?
or alternatively you could request another editor to do it on the following pagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisions_of_IslamthanksJigglyfidders (talk)00:21, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{Editprotected}} have you gathered a consensus yet on whether to addSalafi to the list?Jigglyfidders (talk)05:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{editprotected}} hi could somebody add the ahmadiyya sect to this template please?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmadiyyaalso, could someone add salafi sect to the template please?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SalafithanksJigglyfidders (talk)20:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
it's obvious ahmadiyya is a sect and so is Salafi. They are both listed separately.—Precedingunsigned comment added byJigglyfidders (talk •contribs)10:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{editprotected}}on the islam template i would like you to add 2 denominations please, because they are undeniable sects of islam.1. Salafi -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafiand2. Ahmadiyya -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmadiyya
could you do that please?Jigglyfidders (talk)16:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jigglyfidders (talk)16:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done — Martin(MSGJ · talk)17:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]{{editprotected}}UnderLaw and jurisprudence, there is a subtopicSexuality. It has 5 components : Masturbation, Sexual techniques · Sukuk · Takaful · Tayammum. You can go through the articles and confirm thatSukuk andTakaful come underLaw and jurisprudence > Economics. AndTayammum comes underLaw and jurisprudence > Hygiene. It is, therefore, requested that these edits be kindly made to the template. Hamza [ talk ]04:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{editprotected}}hi, i have a suggestion where you could add 'cultural uslim' to the template because many muslims are not religious and non-practising but only muslim by culture.
otherwise you can implement it in the denomination pagethankshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Muslim
Jigglyfidders (talk)18:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done I've put it in the "Related Topics", there's not really a fit elsewhere. Ronhjones (Talk)23:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]Hello. Here is a version of the template that has more visible and also wrapaware dots between links; avoids bold and italic text within the lists; spaces the lists apart a little more; rewords "Conversionof mosques" to "Conversionto mosques"; and probably one or two other tweaks I can't now recall. If all the parentheses aren't to people's liking, I've seen "Navbox subgroups" used as an alternative.
212.84.101.159 (talk)04:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, as of now it says Quranist which should be changed to a noun as Quranism. Could someone make this change pls?—Precedingunsigned comment added by92.24.58.182 (talk)04:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Right now under denominations it says 'Quranist', but the appropriate noun should be 'Quraniyoon'. Could someone make this change?84.13.63.254 (talk)01:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have noticed thatUmayyad, which this templates links to, only redirects toUmayyad Caliphate so why not change that? --85.129.111.17 (talk)12:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{editprotected}}Almost half of the link targets in this template are to redirects. Could we please change every one of them to point directly to the article pages? Normally in an article this isn't a problem, but in a template it prevents links from appearingbolded when on the relevant article page and instead creates "self-redirects" back to the article. I've got "link classifier" installed in my vector.jsUser:Zunaid/vector.js which colours all the offending links in green. There are too many to give a listing here but anyone with a similar user script andWP:POPUPS installed will be able to quickly correct the entire template.Zunaid06:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done Completed the rest. I've left in the following:Islamic ethics, andEarly Islamic philosophy as they weren't simple pagemoves, it seems that those entire articles have been redirected per some user cleanup issue, so perhaps if we leave the redirect title users may at least look up the revision history if they still wish to see what content was there. --Ϫ03:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]The current article has two problems. 1)In pillars section, only Sunni's pillars are written, and this section must be splitted in two parts, reflecting both Shia Sunni pillars. 2)About Denominations section. As it can be seen in Islam article, the two main sects are Shia and Sunni. Like articles of others religions, for neutrality, Shia name must precede Sunni name (alphabetically ordering). My suggestion is to split this section in two parts, one Shia and Sunni, and one about others.--Aliwiki (talk)20:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I was wondering if it would be appropriate to add TheEpistles of Wisdom to the Religious Texts category? It's debateable whether this is an Islamic text, but it is definitely Ismailic and a development of Islam. Thanks for any consideration!Paul Bedson (talk)23:04, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Can you add the templates in interlanguage links ? I cant do it because this template protected. Thanks a lot —Skandarblabla21:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's not an off-topic, just i would add the interlanguage links... This template exist in french and it's impossible for me to add it. —Skandarblabla03:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
The Sociology pages have been deleted, so the redlinks (· '''[[Islamic sociology|Sociology]]:''' ''[[Sociology in medieval Islam|Early sociology]]'') should be removed from this template. --Elonka14:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DoneAnomie⚔20:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]Please, change the falsely used letterĥ toḥ orh. Ĥ is an Esperanto letter, not used in transliteration of Arabic or any other Semitic language. I couldn't edit the template as it's protected.--Mahmudmasri (talk)14:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
| Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Please addthis version - it cotains link fixes and nothing else.Christian75 (talk)09:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I updated it to use the
hlist class, and I also reduced the protection to semi-protection as there were only 160 transclusions. —Mr. Stradivarius♪ talk ♪10:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Please replace the current template code with the version in the sandboxhere (should be the most recent). There's no change in content, just in presentation. The sandbox code doesn't include the noinclude section that calls the documentation: if/once this request is granted, I'll update the documentation page accordingly (collapsible options).
Thank you,213.246.85.251 (talk)03:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
DoneFunandtrvl (talk)22:58, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
109.92.115.38 (talk)08:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide areliable source if appropriate.L293D (☎ • ✎)11:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
baligh should not be subsectioned as an aspect of Islamic theological jurisprudence; it should instead be under the section on Marrige and Sex, or else be its own topic. Theology refers to the study of the nature of divinity; baligh is a specific aspect of Islamic law dealing with sexual maturity and legal adulthood.50.254.174.101 (talk)15:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not even showing Jihad as an Islamic topic shows that the extremists own the word. Jihad in the Inner/Greater sense is an Islamic tenant and should be added to the Culture section.— Precedingunsigned comment added by143.81.103.41 (talk)13:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This includesnation of islam and more comprehensive, consider replacing it.108.31.73.33 (talk)05:59, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]