This article is ratedList-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Elements:IsotopesLow‑importance This article is supported byWikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to thechemical elements and theirisotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit theproject page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theimportance scale. This article is supported bythe Isotope Taskforce.

Why does the table begin at¹¹⁰Xe instead of¹⁰⁸Xe?— Precedingunsigned comment added byBalgontork (talk •contribs)13:37, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Here's a reference for¹⁰⁸Xe:https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-69945-3_3397. A¹⁰⁹Xe is also listed at NNDC's database. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)23:57, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link onIsotopes of xenon. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/20070927183750/http://www.shef.ac.uk/physics/bus2006/talks/luscher_roland.pdf tohttp://www.shef.ac.uk/physics/bus2006/talks/luscher_roland.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}16:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onIsotopes of xenon. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf tohttp://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)14:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article says that Xenon 124 is stable, but [this report] says that they just saw one decay.Bubba73^{You talkin' to me?}19:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is one of isotopes subject toDouble beta decay.Ruslik_Zero20:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not actually say that it is stable. It says that it is "observationally stable" with a note.Ruslik_Zero20:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bubba73 andRuslik0: That new article is correct; the decay of¹²⁴Xe was indeed observed for the first time and is documented in^[1] (abstract only for now). I updated the isotopes list, templates, and article with this information. Thank you for pointing this out, Bubba73.ComplexRational (talk)23:00, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ComplexRational: We should probably also update the tables inPrimordial nuclide andList of nuclides to include¹²⁴Xe as unstable, too. (I have made a start on the former, along with some other articles which counted the number of stable nuclides.)Double sharp (talk)05:22, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between28 March 2022 and10 June 2022. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):DanqiuChen (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated byCarleydf (talk)17:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

129.104.241.214 (talk)15:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cristiano Toàn (talk) 12:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)¹³⁴Xe is engergically allowed to undergo double beta decay. However it decay energy is relative low 0.825 MeV. By comparison¹³⁶Xe's double beta decay has energy 2.462 MeV and have life 2.38x10^21 yearsCristiano Toàn (talk)08:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)¹³⁶Xe is the most neutron rich for nuclide contains 75 protons or less[reply]

• List-Class chemical elements articles
• Low-importance chemical elements articles
• List-Class chemical element isotope articles
• WikiProject Elements articles