Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Template talk:Hindu scriptures and texts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theHindu scriptures and texts template.
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconHinduism
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope ofWikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofHinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
WikiProject iconWriting systems
WikiProject iconThis template falls within the scope ofWikiProject Writing systems, aWikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating towriting systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop bythe project page and/or leave a query atthe project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
WikiProject iconLiterature
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope ofWikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofLiterature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature

Missing Entries

[edit]

Missing are:

dab() 10:20, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Giving names uniformly

[edit]
  • Uniform transliteration in names. Writingā inMahabharata (1) should imply writingī inBhagavad Gita (2), and so on. The current situation is: (1) is true, (2) is false. Should be fixed?--Imz00:38, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've treated both things.--Imz01:18, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]

I have posed certain questions about this template at Hinduism noticeboard's talk page. Please feel free to chime in there. Thanks.Abecedare03:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason the article mentioned the Artharva Veda as being referred to as the fifth Veda, when it is the fourth out of four. I fixed that, but if someone knows why then fix it back—Precedingunsigned comment added by66.190.237.157 (talk)19:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yoga Vasistha

[edit]

TheYoga Vasistha is missing here. Could it be added? If so, where?Wiki-uk (talk)04:54, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu astrology books

[edit]

Hindu astrology books are not scriptures. So removing them.RedtigerxyzTalk10:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Missing

[edit]

AbHiChatMe!ReadMe!!12:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not all texts are scriptures

[edit]

The title and sections of this template imply that all Hindu texts are scriptures, including their Sanskrit texts on music, phonetics, etc. Few Hindu texts are considered by scholars as Hindu scriptures, most are non-scriptures. Many have religious / spiritual / Hindu culture-related content. For sources and a discussion on Hindu scriptures, see: [1]Scripture, Encyclopedia Britannica (see Scriptures in non-Western religions section); [2] R.C. Zaehner (1992), Hindu Scriptures, Penguin Random House,ISBN 978-0679410782; [3] Dominic Goodall, Hindu Scriptures, University of California Press,ISBN 978-0520207783.

How about the following layout, based on above and other sources:

  • Vedas
  • Upanishads
  • Other scriptures
    • Bhagavad Gita, Agamas
  • Hindu texts
    • Vedangas
    • Shastras and Sutras
    • Puranas
    • Itihasa
  • Scripture classification
  • Timeline

Pinging@Joshua Jonathan:,@Abecedare:,@Kautilya3: and others for thoughts.Ms Sarah Welch (talk)18:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah, I think the border between scripture and non-scripture is not clear cut in Hinduism, and I am afraid Hindus call pretty much every ancient text a "scripture," perhaps wrongly. I am happy for you to reclassify the texts, but the subtle distinction will probably be lost on most people. Cheers,Kautilya3 (talk)09:27, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shastras and Sutras

[edit]

Shashtras are not by any stretch Hindu texts. There is nothing in the wiki article for Shashtras:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shastra itself that indicates that it can be called. The delimitation of what constitutes a Hindu text itself is unclear, therefore it is more logical to go by what can be considered religious in nature and shashtras do not fall in that category.

Moreover, in the list there are many scriptures which fall neither in the category of shashtra nor sutras.— Precedingunsigned comment added by122.163.85.255 (talk)15:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@122.163.85.255: First, welcome to wikipedia. Next, this is just a template, merely a collection of convenient navigational links. The template does not say anywhere that Shastras are found only in Hinduism. Hindu texts do include Shastra and Sutras, but indeed not all Shastra and Sutras are Hindu texts. The link provides convenience to those who wish to navigate to those Hindu texts that are Shastras and Sutras. Your "more logical to go" argument is not persuasive and incorrect. Shastras and Sutras are a genre of Hindu texts (seeJan Gonda, Alper, Staal, Sharma, etc). For all these reasons, I am reverting your edit back to the older version. Please note that perWP:BRD you should not edit war and seek consensus for change to this stable template, on this talk page.Ms Sarah Welch (talk)19:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sushruta and Charaka additions

[edit]

Here are theWP:RS supporting their additions:

Ms Sarah Welch (talk)19:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^Sarah Boslaugh (2007), Encyclopedia of Epidemiology, Volume 1, SAGE Publications,ISBN 978-1412928168, page 547,Quote: "The Hindu text known as Sushruta Samhita (600 AD) is possibly the earliest effort to classify diseases and injuries".
  2. ^Loukas, M; et al. (2010). "Anatomy in ancient India: A focus on the Susruta Samhita".Journal of Anatomy.217 (6): 646.doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01294.x.Quote: Susruta's Samhita emphasized surgical matters, including the use of specific instruments and types of operations. It is in his work that one finds significant anatomical considerations of the ancient Hindu.{{cite journal}}:Explicit use of et al. in:|author1= (help)
  3. ^Raveenthiran, Venkatachalam (2011). "Knowledge of ancient Hindu surgeons on Hirschsprung disease: evidence from Sushruta Samhita of circa 1200-600 bc".Journal of Pediatric Surgery.46 (11). Elsevier BV:2204–2208.doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.07.007.{{cite journal}}:|access-date= requires|url= (help)
  4. ^E. Schultheisz (1981), History of Physiology, Pergamon Press,ISBN 978-0080273426, page 60-61, Quote: "(...) the Charaka Samhita and the Susruta Samhita, both being recensions of two ancient traditions of the Hindu medicine".
  5. ^Wendy Doniger (2014), On Hinduism, Oxford University Press,ISBN 978-0199360079, page 79,Quote: A basic assumption of Hindu medical texts like the Charaka Samhita (composed sometime between 100 BCE and 100 CE) is the doctrine of the three (...).
  6. ^Thomas Banchoff (2009), Religious pluralism, globalization, and world politics, Oxford University Press,ISBN 978-0195323412, page 284,Quote: An early Hindu text, the Caraka Samhita, vividly describes the beginning of life (...)

Unable to set default expanded row

[edit]

Even if I try to expand all sections with {{Hindu scriptures and texts|all}, nothing expands.

Part ofa series on
Hindu scriptures and texts
Related Hindu texts

. Could someone with more knowledge come along and fix this weird issue? Thanx.

--Abhinav (talk)16:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2021

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

please replaceShaiva word withShiva which is written in the right sidebar in the dropdown menu.Nynmetatagg (talk)13:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The header is refering toShaivism. Ganbaruby! (Say hi!)00:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 October 2021

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

Please includeSangam literature aswell. It is very important Hindu texts.157.49.191.178 (talk)17:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide areliable source if appropriate. Please say exactly where you'd likeSangam literature to be added. Thanks. --Ferien(talk)12:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2021

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

AddSangam Literature as a new section and addEight Anthologies,Ten Idylls,Eighteen Lesser Texts andThirukkural andTolkāppiyam.

Reason: These are huge literary works of Tamil Hinduism dating to 2nd century BC - 10th century CE. These are of prime importance in South Indian , Srilankan & South East Asian Hinduism. These are non-vedic shaivasim texts. There are plenty and these are very important to be added as separate column.You can referList of Hindu texts article aswell.Reference:https://tamilandvedas.com/2014/07/15/basic-questions-about-tamils-hinduism/https://www.bl.uk/sacred-texts/articles/sacred-texts-in-hinduism157.49.185.57 (talk)06:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish aconsensus for this alterationbefore using the{{edit semi-protected}} template.RandomCanadian (talk /contribs)23:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

consensus

[edit]

CanSangam Literature be added as a new section and addEight Anthologies,Ten Idylls,Eighteen Lesser Texts andThirukkural andTolkāppiyam.

Reason: These are huge literary works of Tamil Hinduism dating to 2nd century BC - 10th century CE. These are of prime importance in South Indian , Srilankan & South East Asian Hinduism. These are non-vedic shaivasim texts. There are plenty and these are very important to be added as separate column. This template is confined to sanskrit texts alone.You can referList of Hindu texts article aswell.Reference:https://tamilandvedas.com/2014/07/15/basic-questions-about-tamils-hinduism/https://www.bl.uk/sacred-texts/articles/sacred-texts-in-hinduism

Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2021

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

Please addSangam Literature as a new section and addEight Anthologies,Ten Idylls,Eighteen Lesser Texts andThirukkural andTolkāppiyam as it's members.

Reason: These are huge literary works of Tamil Hinduism dating to 2nd century BC - 10th century CE. These are of prime importance in South Indian , Srilankan & South East Asian Hinduism. These are non-vedic shaivasim texts. There are plenty and these are very important to be added as separate column. This template is confined to sanskrit texts alone.You can referList of Hindu texts article aswell.Reference:https://tamilandvedas.com/2014/07/15/basic-questions-about-tamils-hinduism/https://www.bl.uk/sacred-texts/articles/sacred-texts-in-hinduism157.49.184.223 (talk)11:45, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: IP range has beenblocked for sockpuppetry.Tol (talk |contribs) @23:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Hindu_scriptures_and_texts&oldid=1253608832"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp