Template:Great lakes is within the scope ofWikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage oflake-relatedarticles on Wikipedia, using the tools on theproject page. If you would like toparticipate, please visit the project page, where you can join thediscussion and see a list ofopen tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofCanada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofIllinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state ofMichigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related toMinnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theU.S. state ofNew York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state ofWisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin
I've added Lake St. Clair as a 2nd listing in this template. While it is not a 'great' lake, it is an intrical part of the chain of lakes making up the North American Great Lakes. {Chris Light (talk)14:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)}[reply]
I'm thinking we should put it in the historic geology section. It accurately represents what it is; a geologic technicality, not an accurate representation of the human geography. The last time I removed it, it was largely because of the way it was placed; Michigan and Huron shouldnot be listed merely as parenthetical remarks after the geologists' technicality.oknazevad (talk)21:38, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Could we get some opinions of the image that is sandwiching the text. I dont see how its helpful. Navigation templates are to aid in navigation not to display nice images that are non disruptive.Moxy (talk)23:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't see it as unhelpful to show the geographic features that the navbox covers, but thinking on it, a labelled map might be a better choice, as it aids the reader in choosing the best link. I don't see the sandwiching problem you seem to have, which is likely a function of browser settings.
But this is a rather text-dense navbox. I wonder if it couldn't use some trimming. I'm especially not sold on the laundry list if conservation areas; it's almost longer than the rest of the navbox combined, and some of these are pretty obscure. I think putting them on a list article and linking that list in the navbox would be sufficient, just as we don't list every island. That'd also likely help with the text squeezing that Moxy is seeing.oknazevad (talk)04:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see this problem has come up again - perhaps its time to listen to the concerns raised about the image by 3 different editors now? Do others have to side scroll as the IP is indicating he/she has to do? I dont have to side scroll ...for me its just a huge image with sandwiched text. I tried a little test making the image bigger to 240px and this did cause me to have to side scroll -perhaps the image is to big for some browsers - I would guess this is way we dont normally have them.Moxy (talk)02:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
