Template talk:Glasgow stations
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seriously, this template is horrible... At least remove the colours, I think I'm not alone with not being able to stand even looking at it... In the meantime one might wonder what good these templates do at all. /Grillo01:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you change it youself - go on,bebold! --Anthonycfc15:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've done a bit of work on the contents of this template as previously it couldn't seem to decide if it actually wasRailway stations in Glasgow, or if it was trying to beRailway stations in the SPT area, and in the end it was neither. As a result, I've deleted a few stations outwith the city boundaries (e.g. on the Neilston, Newton and Milngavie lines) and added a few which despite being actually in Glasgow and having Wikipedia articles weren't included on the template, including several on the Paisley Canal and Barrhead lines.
As an extension of this work I've also been removing the template on a whole host of other pages where it was appearing (i.e. those for stations which I've removed from the template). I've also shifted several of these fromCategory:Railway stations in Glasgow to the categories for the approriate areas.
Of course, if anyone wants to change this template into one covering the whole SPT network - which might be a reasonable idea given the listing here of all the suburban lines and their colour codes, any thoughts?? - then they would all have to be added again, plus a whole bunch more! --Jellyman07:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody have any objections to me adding some stations to the disused section of the template?Crow Road railway station for instance has a page and is in the Glasgow area yet isn't in the template. I mean I know the criteria might be that the station must still physically exist, but if that were the case then a few others would fail on it. Plus there are still remnants of the station remaining, which I'll try to get photos of. There's a few others that could be added as well such asPartick West railway station. It just seems a bit incomplete to me, and I don't think you can ever really have too much information.
If nobody objects, I'll do it. Of course, anyone else who would rather do it is more than welcome. --Notorious Biggles17:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This template is somewhat redundant, in that it almost exactly replicates the rail part ofTemplate:Transport in Glasgow. I was tempted to recommend it for deletion, but then I thought that an alternative approach could be to cut down on the amount of rail information presented in the transport navbox. Any preferences?Jellyman (talk)13:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
