Template talk:Foreign relations of the United States
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
ROC orTaiwan is not acountry recognised by USA,so how can a non-country be categorised in the international bilateral relation?--Ksyrie01:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone else reckon this template looks cluttered with all those flag icons?Sardanaphalus12:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Doctrines | |||||||||||
| Presidential | |||||||||||
| Other | |||||||||||
I removed the highly-POV Tibet entry. United States government has since the ROC era(1912-1949) recognized Tibet as part of China.
"For its part, the Government of the United States has borne in mind the fact that the Chinese Government has long claimed suzerainty over Tibet and the Chinese Constitution lists Tibet among areas constituting the territory of the Republic of China. This Government has at no time raised a question regarding either of those claims" [State Department,FRUS 1943, p630]
219.79.122.72 (talk)16:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Please change
* [[China–United States relations|China]]** [[Hong Kong–United States relations|Hong Kong]]* [[Japan–United States relations|Japan]]* [[Macau–United States relations|Macau]]
to
* [[China–United States relations|China]]** [[Hong Kong–United States relations|Hong Kong]]** [[Macau–United States relations|Macau]]* [[Japan–United States relations|Japan]]
since both Macau and Hong Kong are part of China (seeSpecial administrative region of China). But the previous version only deems the latter to be, which is factually incorrect.117.158.156.68 (talk)10:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DoneL293D (☎ • ✎)12:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Could the flag icon please be removed in line withWP:ICONDECORATION? Thanks,207.161.86.162 (talk)18:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: There country flags are present across all equivalent templates for all countries. SeeCategory:Foreign relations by country templates. If this is something you want to change, you should seek broader consensus. I suggest opening this discussion atWikipedia:WikiProject International relations.Melmann11:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]I currently have a draft waiting for review on the relations betweenAbkhazia and the United States. If it were to be accepted, on theforeign relations template for the United States, would a separate section have to be created in the bilateral section under the listing of former states? Or would it go under Asia Western where Georgia is listed under a double bullet point next to Georgia as the majority of countries view Abkhazia as part of Georgia? --WikiCleanerMan (talk)19:39, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm curious about why Mexico is in the Central America section. I do understand that some geographic criteria give room for Mexico to be considered a part of such a region, but as far as my knowledge goes, Mexico is considered North American by both Mexicans themselves and Central Americans.
On the other hand, however, I wonder if this distinction in this particular template is based on a cultural background, since Canada shares far more cultural traits with the United States than Mexico does, and as such some people conisder North America a direct equivalent ofAnglo-America (sans Caribbean countries).
.svg)
