| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Should't the 720 and C-135 be on this template? Both have been referred to as a 717 in the past.76.66.193.90 (talk)11:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A 2010s column needs adding, and the colours up to 2009 need bringing up to date. Far too complicated for my editing skills I'm afraid.Mjroots (talk)10:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
There was about a year or so where the 747 was out of production. This was between the 747-400 and 747-8. Is it worth showing this on here.
I have also made some tweaks to reflect 2011, doesnt seem it was updated at the time.
Thanks
--JetBlast (talk)23:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
why not take a more neutral color? Grey makes it seem dead or implies that it's worse, which is not true. #B0D0D0 for example seams like a better choice than #C0C0C0 --Wolfguardian64 (talk)08:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It would be useful and deliver more info if overlapping production times are of different colour. Just another legend-entry. Different colours for narrow- and wide-bodies are IMHO not needed because obvious.87.150.120.96 (talk)06:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Different colors for narrow- and wide-bodies are IMHO not needed because obvious.I disagree that this is obvious. Maybe it's obvious to you and me as to which Boeing models are narrow/wide-bodies, but not to the average reader who is unfamiliar with commercial aircraft. -ZLEAT\C07:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]