| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theAbortion template. |
|
| Archives:1Auto-archiving period:30 days |
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
In the "Movements" section, there's a general pro & anti section. And there is links to the US pro & anti articles. Should the USA based movements get a "pride of place" section right at the top? There already is a link toAbortion in the United States in the 'Country' section. Is that not sufficient? ____Ebelular (talk)15:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How many "[country] pro-life/pro-choice movement" articles exist? If there are many, I agree with you - though we could also expand the template to include links to all the existing ones. If we have articles for just the U. S. pro-life and pro-choice movements, it seems to make sense to include links to them especially.Simplebutpowerful05:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Abortion portal wasrecently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template.BlackcurrantTea (talk)07:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]