Template talk:.NET Framework
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
In my opinion, the articleComparison of Visual Basic and Visual Basic .NET should be added as a link of this template. However, that article is not created, and I think it should be created...
The introduction ofVisual Basic .NET is controversial since it breaksbackward compatibility fromVisual Basic. On the other hand, comparing the two languages can helpsystem migration from old language to new language. Unfortunately, in light ofUpgrading from Visual Basic 6.0 and many sources, the application upgrade is not an easy job...
I will make a request of article creation in the sectionComputer languages My Computer of the pageWikipedia:Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet.
UU (talk)18:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Since development ofIronLisp is aborted in favour of development ofIronScheme, I suggest to add the IronScheme link and probably delete the IronLisp link.The article for 'IronScheme' was created by me as a stub.Jacosi (talk)10:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently,M will be included withVisual Studio 2010. I've heard thatIronPython andIronRuby might be included too, but I've not seen that substantiated. Can we get some verification on these claims? If these languages end up being shipped with VS2010 then they should be listed as 'common' languages rather than 'other' languages. --coldacid(talk|contrib)03:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Acropolis" never got further than CTP and has been discontinued. Should there be a separate "Discontinued" line in the template for Acropolis and the like?Paul Foxworthy (talk)05:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Microsoft consistently abbreviatesWindows Workflow Foundation as WF. The main article uses WF too. WF is clearly not a typo and the template should match the article. WF may be used for legal reasons as theWorld Wide Fund for Nature has previously prevailed in a case affirming their trademarked use of the abbreviation WWF.108.4.2.206 (talk)01:29, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The .NET Framework portal wasrecently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template.BlackcurrantTea (talk)11:46, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This Template should be renamed to just.NET. It does not make sense to have a similar Navbox for every .NET implementation (e.g..NET Core,.NET Framework,.NET Compact Framework,.NET Micro Framework,DotGNU andMono). We can have one Navbox for all of them (as it is now) and the Template name should reflect that.Ghettoblaster (talk)21:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
