Savannah Bond
Savannah Bond in 2022
TarnishedPathtalk 06:37, 12 January 2026 (UTC).
@A person of sorts andFyyyyn: Well-written, long and new enough article. Few issues should be addressed; i.e. the need of in-line citations. All the references are present within the article, but need some sorting. The facts like the birth date and height appear potentially unsourced, so those need the AVN biography reference ahead. I somehow doubt the reliability of the SCMP reference, which is used thrice here, it potentially violatesWP:V. Can it be replaced with a better source?@TarnishedPath: As for the hooks, I suppose all are very straight-forward, the only interesting part for the reader would be the P word in ALT0 and 2, while the B word in ALT1. To me, ALT1 is preferable. Thank you!M.Billoo 10:38, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Billoo, cheers for the review. Was it just for the height and DOB that you had concerns about as far as sourcing goes?TarnishedPathtalk 10:46, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ps, regardingWP:SCMP there is consensus that it is generally reliable aside from it's reporting of the CCP. Is there any other issue you see with the particular story?TarnishedPathtalk 10:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- The problem is, the SCMP one here refers to the "British media", and when you search deep, the references that appear areDaily Star orThe Sun, which further quote the actress from OnlyStans. These both are regarded as fake references. So still I doubtWP:V and reliability.M.Billoo 13:49, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- Pps, I've added citations to the DOB and height in the infobox. The DOB was already referenced at the end of the first sentence.TarnishedPathtalk 14:01, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- Usually,MOS:LEAD does not require inline references, the links go under the body. Some inline citations still need rework, like the one which proves 350 roles should go ahead of this particular clause, instead of using it ahead of the other clause.M.Billoo 13:49, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
@TarnishedPath:Update: Note that the current size of the article is now reduced to less than 1.5kB.M.Billoo 16:15, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
- @User:M.Billoo2000, I'll try and see if I'm able to expand in any way later on.TarnishedPathtalk 22:48, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
- @User:M.Billoo2000, it's 1552 characters now, just by adding detail of what she did prior to porn. I'll go through the sources later and look what else is of any significance that can be added. Regarding SCMP, I'll also look at that later.TarnishedPathtalk 03:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- @User:M.Billoo2000, the article is now at 1,744 characters and questionable sourcing has been removed. I've struck ALT1 as @Launchballer removed the material supporting the hook from the article.TarnishedPathtalk 04:15, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
- Appears fine, I will re-review and comment back shortly.M.Billoo 04:24, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Feels like mostly relying on AVN only may not comply SIGCOV or WP:NACTOR. Plusthe birth year ref is not accessable, and removing the sections do not appear fine. So I request a second opinion for full review, thank you.M.Billoo 05:52, 18 January 2026 (UTC)- @TarnishedPath: ping.M.Billoo 05:53, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
- Birth year ref is googleable and section removal is required perMOS:OVERSECTION. What arethe three best sources for this article?--Launchballer 13:17, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Launchballer, if this went to a deletion discussion I would presentthis AVN article and thisthis SCMP article. The SCMP article was removed from the article due to the sentence "
According to British media, the actress – real name Kelli-Anne Oxley – attended a strict all-girls Catholic secondary school and initially studied beauty therapy before working in a pharmacy for a stint
", which supported some stuff about her in the article (namely her real name). The article was also used to support her DOB. While searching indicates that "British media" likely refers to The Sun and The Mirror, most of the stuff in the article isWP:V by other reliable sources, i.e., AVN. I would therefore classify the SCMP article as being a RS that has SIGCOV. That's aWP:GNG pass to me. I could also spin a forcedWP:ANYBIO argument given the AVN/PornHub/XBIZ/etc awards.TarnishedPathtalk 11:52, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
_(cropped).png)
@A person of sorts andFyyyyn: Well-written, long and new enough article. Few issues should be addressed; i.e. the need of in-line citations. All the references are present within the article, but need some sorting. The facts like the birth date and height appear potentially unsourced, so those need the AVN biography reference ahead. I somehow doubt the reliability of the SCMP reference, which is used thrice here, it potentially violatesWP:V. Can it be replaced with a better source?@TarnishedPath: As for the hooks, I suppose all are very straight-forward, the only interesting part for the reader would be the P word in ALT0 and 2, while the B word in ALT1. To me, ALT1 is preferable. Thank you!M.Billoo 10:38, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
@TarnishedPath:Update: Note that the current size of the article is now reduced to less than 1.5kB.M.Billoo 16:15, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Feels like mostly relying on AVN only may not comply SIGCOV or WP:NACTOR. Plus