Procedural notes: Per therules governing arbitration enforcement appeals, a "clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved administrators" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action. 

Statements may not exceed 500words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.

To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (seeWP:UNINVOLVED).

Appealing user

Example (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log) – ~~~

Sanction being appealed

{{{Sanction being appealed}}}

Administrator imposing the sanction

Example (talk ·contribs ·blocks ·protections ·deletions ·page moves ·rights ·RfA)

Notification of that administrator

The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with adiff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

{{{Reason for the appeal}}}

Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator.

This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.

• Wikipedia arbitration templates

• Wikipedia template-protected templates