Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Telegrapher's equations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromTelegrapher's equation)
Mathematical descriptions of transmission line voltage and current

This article is about an electrical transmission line. For the probabilistic model, seeTelegraph process.

Thetelegrapher's equations (ortelegraph equations) are a set of two coupled, linearpartial differential equations that modelvoltage andcurrent along a linear electricaltransmission line. The equations are important because they allow transmission lines to be analyzed usingcircuit theory.[1] The equations and their solutions are applicable from 0 Hz (i.e.direct current) to frequencies at which the transmission line structure can support higher ordernon-TEM modes.[2]: 282–286  The equations can be expressed in both thetime domain and thefrequency domain. In the time domain the independent variables are distance and time. In the frequency domain the independent variables are distancex{\displaystyle x} and eitherfrequency,ω{\displaystyle \omega }, orcomplex frequency,s{\displaystyle s}. The frequency domain variables can be taken as theLaplace transform orFourier transform of the time domain variables or they can be taken to bephasors in which case the frequency domain equations can be reduced to ordinary differential equations of distance. An advantage of the frequency domain approach is thatdifferential operators in the time domain become algebraic operations in frequency domain.

The equations come fromOliver Heaviside who developed thetransmission line model starting with an August 1876 paper,On the Extra Current.[3] The model demonstrates that theelectromagnetic waves can be reflected on the wire, and that wave patterns can form along the line. Originally developed to describetelegraph wires, the theory can also be applied toradio frequencyconductors, audio frequency (such astelephone lines), low frequency (such as power lines), and pulses of direct current.

Distributed components

[edit]
Schematic representation of the elementary components of a transmission line

The telegrapher's equations result fromcircuit theory. In a more practical approach, one assumes that theconductors are composed of an infinite series oftwo-port elementary components, each representing aninfinitesimally short segment of the transmission line:

The model consists of aninfinite series of the infinitesimal elements shown in the figure, and the values of the components are specifiedper unit length, so the picture of the component can be misleading. An alternative notation is to useR{\displaystyle R'},L{\displaystyle L'},C{\displaystyle C'}, andG{\displaystyle G'} to emphasize that the values are derivatives with respect to length, and that the units of measure combine correctly. These quantities can also be known as theprimary line constants to distinguish from the secondary line constants derived from them, these being thecharacteristic impedance, thepropagation constant,attenuation constant andphase constant. All these constants are constant with respect to time, voltage and current. They may be non-constant functions of frequency.

Role of different components

[edit]
Schematic showing a wave flowing rightward down a lossless transmission line. Black dots representelectrons, and the arrows show the electric field.

The role of the different components can be visualized based on the animation at right.

InductanceL
The inductance couples current to energy stored in the magnetic field. It makes it look like the current hasinertia – i.e. with a large inductance, it is difficult to increase or decrease the current flow at any given point. Large inductanceL makes the wave move more slowly, just as waves travel more slowly down a heavy rope than a light string. Large inductance alsoincreases the line'ssurge impedance (more voltage needed to push the sameAC current through the line).
CapacitanceC
The capacitance couples voltage to the energy stored in the electric field. It controls how much the bunched-up electrons within each conductor repel, attract, or divert the electrons in theother conductor. By deflecting some of these bunched up electrons, the speed of the wave and its strength (voltage) are both reduced. With a larger capacitance,C, there is less repulsion, because theother line (which always has the opposite charge) partly cancels out these repulsive forceswithin each conductor. Larger capacitance equals weakerrestoring forces, making the wave move slightly slower, and also gives the transmission line alowersurge impedance (less voltage needed to push the same AC current through the line).
ResistanceR
Resistance corresponds to resistance interior to the two lines, combined. That resistanceR couples current toohmic losses thatdrop a little of the voltage along the line as heat deposited into the conductor, leaving the current unchanged. Generally, the line resistance is very low, compared to inductivereactanceωL at radio frequencies, and for simplicity is treated as if it were zero, with any voltage dissipation or wire heating accounted for as corrections to the "lossless line" calculation, or just ignored.
ConductanceG
Conductance between the lines represents how well current can "leak" from one line to the other. Conductance couples voltage todielectric loss deposited as heat into whatever serves as insulation between the two conductors.G reduces propagating current byshunting it between the conductors. Generally, wire insulation (including air) is quite good, and the conductance is almost nothing compared to the capacitivesusceptanceωC, and for simplicity is treated as if it were zero.

All four parametersL,C,R, andG depend on the material used to build the cable or feedline. All four change with frequency:R, andG tend to increase for higher frequencies, andL andC tend to drop as the frequency goes up.The figure at right shows a lossless transmission line, where bothR andG are zero, which is the simplest and by far most common form of the telegrapher's equations used, but slightly unrealistic (especially regardingR).

Values of primary parameters for telephone cable

[edit]
Representative parameter data for 24 gauge telephone polyethylene insulated cable (PIC) at70 °F (294 K)[4]
Frequency
(Hz)
RLGC
Ω/kmΩ/1000 ftμH/kmμH/1000 ftμS/kmμS/1000 ftnF/kmnF/1000 ft
1 Hz172.2452.50612.9186.80.0000.00051.5715.72
1 kHz172.2852.51612.5186.70.0720.02251.5715.72
10 kHz172.7052.64609.9185.90.5310.16251.5715.72
100 kHz191.6358.41580.7177.03.3271.19751.5715.72
1 MHz463.59141.30506.2154.329.1118.87351.5715.72
2 MHz643.14196.03486.2148.253.20516.21751.5715.72
5 MHz999.41304.62467.5142.5118.07435.98951.5715.72

The variation ofR andL is mainly due toskin effect andproximity effect. The constancy of the capacitance is a consequence of intentional design.

The variation ofG can be inferred from a statement byFrederick Terman:[5] "The power factor ... tends to be independent of frequency, since the fraction of energy lost during each cycle ... is substantially independent of the number of cycles per second over wide frequency ranges."

A function of the formG(f)=G1(ff1)ge{\displaystyle G(f)=G_{1}\cdot \left({\frac {f}{f_{1}}}\right)^{g_{\mathrm {e} }}}withge close to1.0 would fit Terman's statement. Walter Chen gives an equation of similar form.[6] WhereG( ) is conductivity as a function of frequency,G1,f1, andge are all real constants.

Usually the resistive losses (R) grow proportionately tof1/2 and dielectric losses grow proportionately tofge withge ≈ 1 so at a high enough frequency, dielectric losses will exceed resistive losses. In practice, before that point is reached, a transmission line with a better dielectric is used. In long distance rigidcoaxial cable, to get very low dielectric losses, the solid dielectric may be replaced by air with plastic spacers at intervals to keep the center conductor on axis.

The equation

[edit]

Time domain

[edit]

The telegrapher's equations in the time domain are:xV(x,t)=LtI(x,t)RI(x,t)xI(x,t)=CtV(x,t)GV(x,t){\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}V(x,t)&=-L\,{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}I(x,t)-RI(x,t)\\[1ex]{\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}I(x,t)&=-C\,{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}V(x,t)-GV(x,t)\end{aligned}}}

They can be combined to get two partial differential equations, each with only one dependent variable, eitherV{\displaystyle V} orI{\displaystyle I}:2x2V(x,t)LC2t2V(x,t)=(RC+GL)tV(x,t)+GRV(x,t)2x2I(x,t)LC2t2I(x,t)=(RC+GL)tI(x,t)+GRI(x,t){\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}}V(x,t)-LC\,{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}V(x,t)&=\left(RC+GL\right){\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}V(x,t)+GR\,V(x,t)\\[1ex]{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}}I(x,t)-LC\,{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}I(x,t)&=\left(RC+GL\right){\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}I(x,t)+GR\,I(x,t)\end{aligned}}}

Except for the dependent variable (V{\displaystyle V} orI{\displaystyle I}) the formulas are identical.

Frequency domain

[edit]

The telegrapher's equations in the frequency domain are developed in similar forms:[7][1][8]: 59–378 [9]: 497–505 [10][11][12]ddxVω(x)=(jωLω+Rω)Iω(x),ddxIω(x)=(jωCω+Gω)Vω(x).{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {d}{dx}}\mathbf {V} _{\omega }(x)&=-\left(j\omega L_{\omega }+R_{\omega }\right)\mathbf {I} _{\omega }(x),\\[1ex]{\frac {d}{dx}}\mathbf {I} _{\omega }(x)&=-\left(j\omega C_{\omega }+G_{\omega }\right)\mathbf {V} _{\omega }(x).\end{aligned}}}Here,Iω(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {I} _{\omega }(x)} andVω(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {V} _{\omega }(x)} arephasors, with the subscriptω{\displaystyle \omega } indicating the possible frequency-dependence of the parameters.

The first equation means thatVω(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {V} _{\omega }(x)\,}, the propagating voltage at pointx{\displaystyle x}, is decreased by the voltage loss produced byIω(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {I} _{\omega }(x)\,}, the current at that point passing through the seriesimpedanceR+jωL{\displaystyle R+j\omega L}. The second equation means thatIω(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {I} _{\omega }(x)\,}, the propagating current at pointx{\displaystyle x}, is decreased by the current loss produced byVω(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {V} _{\omega }(x)\,}, the voltage at that point appearing across the shuntadmittanceG+jωC{\displaystyle G+j\omega C\,}.

These equations may be combined to produce two uncoupled second-orderordinary differential equationsd2dx2Vω(x)=γ2Vω(x),d2dx2Iω(x)=γ2Iω(x),{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {d^{2}}{dx^{2}}}\mathbf {V} _{\omega }(x)&=\gamma ^{2}\mathbf {V} _{\omega }(x),\\[1ex]{\frac {d^{2}}{dx^{2}}}\mathbf {I} _{\omega }(x)&=\gamma ^{2}\mathbf {I} _{\omega }(x),\end{aligned}}}withγα+jβ(Rω+jωLω)(Gω+jωCω),{\displaystyle \gamma \equiv \alpha +j\beta \equiv {\sqrt {\left(R_{\omega }+j\omega L_{\omega }\right)\left(G_{\omega }+j\omega C_{\omega }\right)}},}whereα{\displaystyle \alpha } is called theattenuation constant andβ{\displaystyle \beta } is called thephase constant.[1]: 385 

Working in the frequency domain has the benefit of dealing with bothsteady state andtransient problems in a similar fashion.[13] In case of the latter the frequencyω{\displaystyle \omega } becomes acontinuous variable; a solution can be obtained by first solving the above (homogeneous) second-order ODEs and then applying theFourier inversion theorem.[14](see§ Lossless sinusoidal steady-state below for an example of solving steady-state problems.)

Homogeneous solutions

[edit]

Each of the preceding differential equations have twohomogeneous solutions in an infinite transmission line.

For the voltage equationVω,F(x)=Vω,F(a)e+γ(ax)forward voltage wave;+Vω,R(x)=Vω,R(b)eγ(bx)reverse voltage wave;Vω(x),F=Vω,F(x)+Vω,R(x)total voltage wave.{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\mathbf {V} _{\omega ,F}(x)&=\mathbf {V} _{\omega ,F}(a)\,e^{+\gamma (a-x)}&&{\text{forward voltage wave}};\\+\mathbf {V} _{\omega ,R}(x)&=\mathbf {V} _{\omega ,R}(b)\,e^{-\gamma (b-x)}&&{\text{reverse voltage wave}};\\\hline \mathbf {V} _{\omega }(x)_{\hphantom {,F}}&=\mathbf {V} _{\omega ,F}(x)+\mathbf {V} _{\omega ,R}(x)&&{\text{total voltage wave}}.\end{aligned}}}

For the current equationIω,F(x)=Iω,F(a)e+γ(ax)forward current wave;Iω,R(x)=Iω,R(b)eγ(bx)reverse current wave;Iω(x),F=Iω,F(x)Iω,R(x)total current wave.{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\mathbf {I} _{\omega ,F}(x)&=\mathbf {I} _{\omega ,F}(a)\,e^{+\gamma (a-x)}&&{\text{forward current wave}};\\-\mathbf {I} _{\omega ,R}(x)&=\mathbf {I} _{\omega ,R}(b)\,e^{-\gamma (b-x)}&&{\text{reverse current wave}};\\\hline \mathbf {I} _{\omega }(x)_{\hphantom {,F}}&=\mathbf {I} _{\omega ,F}(x)-\mathbf {I} _{\omega ,R}(x)&&{\text{total current wave}}.\end{aligned}}}

The negative sign in the previous equation indicates that the current in the reverse wave is traveling in the opposite direction.

Note:Vω,F(x)=ZcIω,F(x),Vω,R(x)=ZcIω,R(x),{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\mathbf {V} _{\omega ,F}(x)=\mathbf {Z} _{c}\,\mathbf {I} _{\omega ,F}(x),\\[0.4ex]\mathbf {V} _{\omega ,R}(x)=\mathbf {Z} _{c}\,\mathbf {I} _{\omega ,R}(x),\end{aligned}}}Zc=Rω+jωLωGω+jωCω,{\displaystyle \mathbf {Z} _{c}={\sqrt {\frac {R_{\omega }+j\omega L_{\omega }}{G_{\omega }+j\omega C_{\omega }}}}\,,}where the following symbol definitions hold:

Symbol definitions
SymbolDefinition
a{\displaystyle a}point at which the values of the forward waves are known
b{\displaystyle b}point at which the values of the reverse waves are known
Vω(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {V} _{\omega }(x)}value of the total voltage at pointx
Vω,F(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {V} _{\omega ,F}(x)}value of the forward voltage wave at pointx
Vω,R(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {V} _{\omega ,R}(x)}value of the reverse voltage wave at pointx
Vω,F(a){\displaystyle \mathbf {V} _{\omega ,F}(a)}value of the forward voltage wave at pointa
Vω,R(b){\displaystyle \mathbf {V} _{\omega ,R}(b)}value of the reverse voltage wave at pointb
Iω(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {I} _{\omega }(x)}value of the total current at pointx
Iω,F(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {I} _{\omega ,F}(x)}value of the forward current wave at pointx
Iω,R(x){\displaystyle \mathbf {I} _{\omega ,R}(x)}value of the reverse current wave at pointx
Iω,F(a){\displaystyle \mathbf {I} _{\omega ,F}(a)}value of the forward current wave at pointa
Iω,R(b){\displaystyle \mathbf {I} _{\omega ,R}(b)}value of the reverse current wave at pointb
Zc{\displaystyle \mathbf {Z} _{c}}characteristic impedance
γ{\displaystyle \gamma }propagation constant

Finite length

[edit]
Coaxial transmission line with one source and one load

Johnson gives the following solution,[2]: 739–741 VLVS=[(H1+H2)(1+ZSZL)+(H1H2)(ZSZC+ZCZL)]1=ZLZCZC(ZL+ZS)cosh(γx)+(ZLZS+ZC2)sinh(γx){\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\mathbf {V} _{\mathsf {L}}}{\mathbf {V} _{\mathsf {S}}}}&=\left[\left({\frac {\mathbf {H} ^{-1}+\mathbf {H} }{2}}\right)\left(1+{\frac {\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {S}}}{\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {L}}}}\right)+\left({\frac {\mathbf {H} ^{-1}-\mathbf {H} }{2}}\right)\left({\frac {\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {S}}}{\mathbf {\mathbf {Z} } _{\mathsf {C}}}}+{\frac {\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {C}}}{\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {L}}}}\right)\right]^{-1}\\[2ex]&={\frac {\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {L}}\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {C}}}{\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {C}}\left(\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {L}}+\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {S}}\right)\cosh \left({\boldsymbol {\gamma }}x\right)+\left(\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {L}}\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {S}}+\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {C}}^{2}\right)\sinh \left({\boldsymbol {\gamma }}x\right)}}\end{aligned}}}whereHeγx,{\displaystyle \mathbf {H} \equiv e^{-{\boldsymbol {\gamma }}x},} andx{\displaystyle x} is the length of the transmission line.

In the special case where all the impedances are equal,ZL=ZS=ZC,{\displaystyle \mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {L}}=\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {S}}=\mathbf {Z} _{\mathsf {C}},} the solution reduces toVLVS=12eγx{\displaystyle {\frac {\mathbf {V} _{\mathsf {L}}}{\mathbf {V} _{\mathsf {S}}}}={\frac {1}{2}}e^{-{\boldsymbol {\gamma }}x}\,}.

Lossless transmission

[edit]

WhenωLR{\displaystyle \omega L\gg R} andωCG{\displaystyle \omega C\gg G}, wire resistance and insulation conductance can be neglected, and the transmission line is considered as an ideal lossless structure. In this case, the model depends only on theL andC elements. The telegrapher's equations then describe the relationship between the voltageV and the currentI along the transmission line, each of which is a function of positionx and timet:V=V(x,t)I=I(x,t){\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}V&=V(x,t)\\[.5ex]I&=I(x,t)\end{aligned}}}The equations themselves consist of a pair of coupled, first-order,partial differential equations. The first equation shows that the induced voltage is related to the time rate-of-change of the current through the cable inductance, while the second shows, similarly, that the current drawn by the cable capacitance is related to the time rate-of-change of the voltage.Vx=LIt{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial V}{\partial x}}=-L{\frac {\partial I}{\partial t}}}Ix=CVt{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial I}{\partial x}}=-C{\frac {\partial V}{\partial t}}}

These equations may be combined to form twowave equations, one for voltageV{\displaystyle V}, the other for currentI{\displaystyle I}:2Vt2v~22Vx2=02It2v~22Ix2=0{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\partial ^{2}V}{\partial t^{2}}}-{\tilde {v}}^{2}{\frac {\partial ^{2}V}{\partial x^{2}}}&=0\\[1ex]{\frac {\partial ^{2}I}{\partial t^{2}}}-{\tilde {v}}^{2}{\frac {\partial ^{2}I}{\partial x^{2}}}&=0\end{aligned}}}wherev~1LC{\displaystyle {\tilde {v}}\equiv {\frac {1}{\sqrt {LC}}}} is thepropagation speed of waves traveling through the transmission line. For transmission lines made of parallel perfect conductors with vacuum between them, this speed is equal to thespeed of light.

Lossless sinusoidal steady-state

[edit]
See also:Phasor

In the case ofsinusoidalsteady-state (i.e., when a pure sinusoidal voltage is applied andtransients have ceased) theangular frequencyω{\displaystyle \omega } is fixed and the voltage and current take the form of single-tone sine waves:[15]V(x,t)=Re{V(x)ejωt},I(x,t)=Re{I(x)ejωt}.{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}V(x,t)&={\mathcal {Re}}\left\{V(x)e^{j\omega t}\right\},\\[1ex]I(x,t)&={\mathcal {Re}}\left\{I(x)e^{j\omega t}\right\}.\end{aligned}}}In this case, the telegrapher's equations reduce todVdx=jωLI=LdIdt,dIdx=jωCV=CdVdt.{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {dV}{dx}}&=-j\omega LI=-L{\frac {dI}{dt}},\\[1ex]{\frac {dI}{dx}}&=-j\omega CV=-C{\frac {dV}{dt}}.\end{aligned}}}

Likewise, the wave equations reduce to one-dimensionalHelmholtz equationsd2Vdx2+k2V=0,d2Idx2+k2I=0,{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&{\frac {d^{2}V}{dx^{2}}}+k^{2}V=0,\\[1ex]&{\frac {d^{2}I}{dx^{2}}}+k^{2}I=0,\end{aligned}}}wherek is thewave number:k:=ωLC =ωv~.{\displaystyle k:=\omega {\sqrt {LC\ }}={\frac {\omega }{\tilde {v}}}.}In the lossless case, it is possible to show thatV(x)=V1ejkx+V2e+jkx,{\displaystyle V(x)=V_{1}\,e^{-jkx}+V_{2}\,e^{+jkx},}andI(x)=V1ZoejkxV2Zoe+jkx ,{\displaystyle I(x)={\frac {V_{1}}{Z_{\mathsf {o}}}}\,e^{-jkx}-{\frac {V_{2}}{Z_{\mathsf {o}}}}\,e^{+jkx}\ ,}where in this special case, k {\displaystyle \ k\ } is a real quantity that may depend on frequency and Zo {\displaystyle \ Z_{\mathsf {o}}\ } is thecharacteristic impedance of the transmission line, which, for a lossless line is given byZo=LC  ,{\displaystyle Z_{\mathsf {o}}={\sqrt {{\frac {L}{C}}\ }}\ ,}and V1 {\displaystyle \ V_{1}\ } and V2 {\displaystyle \ V_{2}\ } are arbitrary constants of integration, which are determined by the twoboundary conditions (one for each end of the transmission line).

This impedance does not change along the length of the line sinceL andC are constant at any point on the line, provided that the cross-sectional geometry of the line remains constant.

Loss-free case, general solution

[edit]

In the loss-free case(R=G=0{\displaystyle R=G=0}), the general solution of the wave equation for the voltage is the sum of a forward traveling wave and a backward traveling wave:V(x,t)=f1(xv~t)+f2(x+v~t){\displaystyle V(x,t)=f_{1}(x-{\tilde {v}}t)+f_{2}(x+{\tilde {v}}t)}where

Here,f1{\displaystyle f_{1}} represents the amplitude profile of a wave traveling from left to right – in a positivex{\displaystyle x} direction – whilstf2{\displaystyle f_{2}} represents the amplitude profile of a wave traveling from right to left. It can be seen that the instantaneous voltage at any pointx{\displaystyle x} on the line is the sum of the voltages due to both waves.

Using the currentI{\displaystyle I} and voltageV{\displaystyle V} relations given by the telegrapher's equations, we can writeI(x,t)=1Zo[f1(xv~t)f2(x+v~t)].{\displaystyle I(x,t)={\frac {1}{Z_{\mathsf {o}}}}{\Bigl [}f_{1}(x-{\tilde {v}}t)-f_{2}(x+{\tilde {v}}t){\Bigr ]}\,.}

Lossy transmission line

[edit]
In the presence of losses the solution of the telegrapher's equation has both damping and dispersion, as visible when compared with the solution of a lossless wave equation.

When the loss elementsR{\displaystyle R} andG{\displaystyle G} are too substantial to ignore, the differential equations describing the elementary segment of line arexV(x,t)=LtI(x,t)RI(x,t),xI(x,t)=CtV(x,t)GV(x,t).{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}V(x,t)&=-L{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}I(x,t)-R\,I(x,t)\,,\\[6pt]{\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}I(x,t)&=-C{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}V(x,t)-G\,V(x,t)\,.\end{aligned}}}

By differentiating both equations with respect tox, and some algebra, we obtain a pair ofdamped,dispersivehyperbolic partial differential equations each involving only one unknown:2x2V=LC2t2V+(RC+GL)tV+GRV,2x2I=LC2t2I+(RC+GL)tI+GRI.{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}}V&=LC{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}V+\left(RC+GL\right){\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}V+GRV,\\[6pt]{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}}I&=LC{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}I+\left(RC+GL\right){\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}I+GRI.\end{aligned}}}

These equations resemble the homogeneous wave equation with extra terms inV andI and their first derivatives. These extra terms cause the signal to decay and spread out with time and distance. If the transmission line is only slightly lossy(RωL{\displaystyle R\ll \omega L} andGωC{\displaystyle G\ll \omega C}), signal strength will decay over distance aseαx{\displaystyle e^{-\alpha x}} whereαR2Z0+GZ02 {\displaystyle \alpha \approx {\frac {R}{2Z_{0}}}+{\frac {GZ_{0}}{2}}~}.[16]

Solutions of the telegrapher's equations as circuit components

[edit]
This section mayrequirecleanup to meet Wikipedia'squality standards. The specific problem is:Poor style. Please helpimprove this section if you can.(June 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Equivalent circuit of an unbalanced transmission line (such as coaxial cable) where:2/Zo is the trans-admittance of VCCS (Voltage Controlled Current Source),x is the length of transmission line,Z(s) ≡Zo(s) is the characteristic impedance,T(s) is the propagation function,γ(s) is the propagation "constant",sjω, andj2 ≡ −1.

The solutions of the telegrapher's equations can be inserted directly into a circuit as components. The circuit in the figure implements the solutions of the telegrapher's equations.[17]

The solution of the telegrapher's equations can be expressed as anABCD two-port network with the following defining equations[11]: 5–14, 44 V1=V2cosh(γx)+I2Zosinh(γx),I1=V2Zosinh(γx)+I2cosh(γx).{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}V_{1}&=V_{2}\cosh(\gamma x)+I_{2}Z_{\mathsf {o}}\sinh(\gamma x)\,,\\[1ex]I_{1}&={\frac {V_{2}}{Z_{\mathsf {o}}}}\sinh(\gamma x)+I_{2}\cosh(\gamma x)\,.\end{aligned}}}whereZoRω+jωLωGω+jωCω,{\displaystyle Z_{\mathsf {o}}\equiv {\sqrt {\frac {R_{\omega }+j\omega L_{\omega }}{G_{\omega }+j\omega C_{\omega }}}},}andγ(Rω+jωLω)(Gω+jωCω),{\displaystyle \gamma \equiv {\sqrt {\left(R_{\omega }+j\omega L_{\omega }\right)\left(G_{\omega }+j\omega C_{\omega }\right)}},}just as in the preceding sections. The line parametersRω,Lω,Gω, andCω are subscripted byω to emphasize that they could be functions of frequency.

The ABCD type two-port givesV1{\displaystyle V_{1}} andI1{\displaystyle I_{1}} as functions ofV2{\displaystyle V_{2}} andI2{\displaystyle I_{2}\,}. The voltage and current relations are symmetrical: Both of the equations shown above, when solved forV1{\displaystyle V_{1}} andI1{\displaystyle I_{1}} as functions ofV2{\displaystyle V_{2}} andI2{\displaystyle I_{2}} yield exactly the same relations, merely with subscripts "1" and "2" reversed, and thesinh{\displaystyle \sinh } terms' signs made negative ("1"→"2" direction is reversed "1"←"2", hence the sign change).

Every two-wire or balanced transmission line has an implicit (or in some cases explicit) third wire which is called theshield, sheath, common, earth, or ground. So every two-wire balanced transmission line has two modes which are nominally called thedifferential mode andcommon mode. The circuit shown in the bottom diagram only can model the differential mode.

In the top circuit, the voltage doublers, the difference amplifiers, and impedancesZo(s) account for the interaction of the transmission line with the external circuit. This circuit is a useful equivalent for anunbalanced transmission line like acoaxial cable.

These are not unique: Other equivalent circuits are possible.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcHayt, William H. (1989).Engineering Electromagnetics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 381–392.ISBN 0070274061 – viaInternet Archive.
  2. ^abJohnson, Howard; Graham, Martin (2003).High Speed Signal Propagation (1st ed.). Prentice-Hall.ISBN 0-13-084408-X.
  3. ^Hunt, Bruce J. (2005).The Maxwellians. Ithaca, NY, USA:Cornell University Press. pp. 66–67.ISBN 0-80148234-8.
  4. ^Reeve, Whitman D. (1995).Subscriber Loop Signaling and Transmission Handbook.IEEE Press. p. 558.ISBN 0-7803-0440-3.
  5. ^Terman, Frederick Emmons (1943).Radio Engineers' Handbook (1st ed.).McGraw-Hill. p. 112.
  6. ^Chen, Walter Y. (2004).Home Networking Basics.Prentice Hall. p. 26.ISBN 0-13-016511-5.
  7. ^Kraus, John D. (1984).Electromagnetics (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 380–419.ISBN 0-07-035423-5.
  8. ^Marshall, Stanley V.; Skitek, Gabriel G. (1987).Electromagnetic Concepts and Applications (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.ISBN 0-13-249004-8.
  9. ^Sadiku, Matthew N. O. (1989).Elements of Electromagnetics (1st ed.). Saunders College Publishing.ISBN 0-03-013484-6.
  10. ^Harrington, Roger F. (1961).Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 61–65.ISBN 0-07-026745-6.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  11. ^abKarakash, John J. (1950).Transmission lines and Filter Networks (1st ed.). Macmillan. pp. 5–14.
  12. ^Metzger, Georges; Vabre, Jean-Paul (1969).Transmission Lines with Pulse Excitation (1st ed.). Academic Press. pp. 1–10.LCCN 69-18342.
  13. ^Miano, Giovanni; Maffucci, Antonio (2001).Transmission Lines and Lumped Circuits. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 23–26, 132.ISBN 0-12-189710-9.
  14. ^Noble, Ben (1958).Methods Based on the Wiener-Hopf Technique for the Solution of Partial Differential Equations. New York, N.Y: Taylor & Francis US. pp. 27–28, 97.ISBN 978-0-8284-0332-0.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  15. ^Mooijweer, H. (1971).Microwave Techniques. London: Macmillan Education UK. pp. 74–77.doi:10.1007/978-1-349-01065-3.ISBN 978-1-349-01067-7.
  16. ^Miano, Giovanni; Maffucci, Antonio (2001).Transmission Lines and Lumped Circuits.Academic Press. p. 130.ISBN 0-12-189710-9. The book uses the symbolμ instead ofα.
  17. ^McCammon, Roy (June 2010)."SPICE Simulation of Transmission Lines by the Telegrapher's Method"(PDF).cmpnet.com. RF Design Line. Retrieved2010-10-22; also"Part 1 of 3".SPICE simulation of transmission lines by the telegrapher's method. Microwave & RF design – viaE.E. Times.
History
Pioneers
Transmission
media
Network topology
and switching
Multiplexing
Concepts
Types of network
Notable networks
Locations
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Telegrapher%27s_equations&oldid=1322999545"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp