This articlemay containoriginal research. Pleaseimprove it byverifying the claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.(March 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| भारतीय दूरसंचार विनियामक प्राधिकरण | |
TRAI Logo | |
![]() TRAI complete 25 year logo | |
| Regulatory agency overview | |
|---|---|
| Formed | 20 February 1997; 28 years ago (1997-02-20) |
| Jurisdiction | Department of Telecommunications,Ministry of Communications,Government of India |
| Headquarters | 4th, 5th, 6th & 7th Floor, Tower-F, World Trade Centre, Nauroji Nagar, New Delhi: 110029[1] |
| Regulatory agency executives |
|
| Key document | |
| Website | trai |
TheTelecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) is aregulatory body set up by theGovernment of India under section 3 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997. It is theregulator of thetelecommunications sector in India.[2] It consists of a chairperson and not more than two full-time members and not more than two part-time members. The TRAI Act was amended by an ordinance, effective from 24 January 2000, establishing aTelecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal to take over the adjudicatory and disputes functions from TRAI.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India was established on 20 February 1997 by anAct of Parliament to regulate telecom services and tariffs in India. Earlier, regulation of telecom services and tariffs was overseen by theCentral Government.
TRAI's mission is to create and nurture conditions for the growth oftelecommunications in India to enable the country to have a leading role in the emerging global information society.[3]
One of its main objectives is to provide a fair and transparent environment that promotes a level playing field and facilitates fair competition in the market. TRAI regularly issues orders and directions on various subjects such astariffs, interconnections, quality of service,direct to home services andmobile number portability.
In January 2016, TRAI introduced an important change intelecommunication to the benefit of consumers, where they would be compensated₹1 (equivalent to₹1.00 or 1.2¢ US in 2023) for every dropped call, subject to a maximum of three dropped calls in a day.[4] In May 2016, this regulation was revoked by theSupreme Court on the grounds of being "unreasonable, arbitrary and unconstitutional".[5]
TRAI is administered through asecretariat headed by a secretary. All proposals are processed by the secretary, who organises the agenda for authority meetings (consulting with the chairperson), prepares the minutes and issues regulations in accordance to the meetings. The secretary is assisted byadvisors. These include Mobile Network,Interconnection and FixeNetwork,BroadBand and Policy Analysis, Quality of Service,Broadcasting &Cable Services, Economic Regulation, Financial Analysis & IFA, Legal, Consumer Affairs & International Relation and Administration & Personnel. Officers are selected from theIndian Telecommunications Service and theIndian Administrative Service (IAS).[6]
List of Chairpersons:[7]
| No. | Name | Tenure | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Justice (Retd.) S. S. Sodhi | 1997 | 2000 |
| 2 | M. S. Verma | 2000 | 2003 |
| 3 | Pradip Baijal | 2003 | 2006 |
| 4 | Nripendra Misra | 2006 | 2009 |
| 5 | Dr. J. S. Sarma | 2009 | 2012 |
| 6 | Rahul Khullar | 2012 | 2015 |
| 7 | Ram Sewak Sharma | 2015 | 2020 |
| 8 | Dr. P. D. Vaghela | 2020 | 2023 |
| 9 | Anil Kumar Lahoti,IRSE | 2024 | 2028 |
On 6 June 2017, TRAI launched three new apps and a web portal to highlight the telecom services that are being offered to the users.
Mycall app, MySpeed app and Do not disturb (DND 2.0) apps can be used to ensure that there is transparency between what consumers are paying for and what telecom operators are promising to provide at a certain rate.
In December 2018, TRAI released another app called TRAI Channel Selector. Using this app, they can add, remove and manage their channels.
In order to increase broadband penetration in India, TRAI has proposed WANI (Wi-Fi Access Network Interface) architecture. If implemented, it may lead to set up of Public Data Offices (PDOs) where Wi-FI Internet would be available on demand. TRAI relates the same with PCOs which were used to do the voice calls and were very popular hotspots before the mobile phones or home landlines became the ultimate mode of communication.[8]
To increase transparency and give a data-based overview of Indian Telecom Industry at regular intervals, TRAI publishes multiple reports under Release/Publication "Reports" section on its website.
The TRAI has been accused of bending its rules multiple times to letJio, a subsidiary ofReliance Industries Limited, become a market leader in the span of a few years. Jio was allowed to "test" its services for a much longer period and with a much larger subscriber base than was the industrial norm. In a letter to the telecom department, Rajan Mathews of theCellular Operators Association of India wrote that Reliance's offers were "full-blown and full-fledged services masquerading as tests, which bypass regulations and can potentially game policy features." TRAI was also accused of modifying its definition of "significant market power" so as to exclude Jio from strict scrutiny. Whilst initially the definition of market power was based on total network activity, the parameters were changed to subscriber share and gross revenue. Jio qualified as a significant market power according to the first definition, but not the second.[9]
The TRAI has been criticized for making Wi-Fi difficult to access at airports across India. As per several TRAI officials, Wi-Fi access across airports, that requires a pin through phone numbers, has been cited due to security reasons and KYC (know your customer) requirements, and limited accessibility for 45 minutes.[10] The system has been slammed by several domestic and international travelers due to inconvenience to international passengers, limited timeframe to use and complicated access.[11] Despite criticism and negative reviews posted by travelers onSkytrax andTripadvisor, the TRAI andAirports Authority of India have consistently refused to change the rules and justified citing security, which have affected ratings of both domestic and international airports across the country when compared to other nations.[12]