Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Tectonic uplift

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Geologic uplift of Earth's surface that is attributed to plate tectonics
Raised beach indicating 9 m of uplift during the365 Crete earthquake, other shorelines identified at this site are at 14 m, 17m, 34m, 55m & 75m elevation, consistent with a long-term uplift rate of 2.5–2.7 mm per year over the last 45,000 years

Tectonic uplift is thegeologic uplift ofEarth's surface that is attributed toplate tectonics. Whileisostatic response is important, an increase in the mean elevation of a region can only occur in response to tectonic processes ofcrustal thickening (such asmountain building events), changes in the density distribution of the crust and underlyingmantle, and flexural support due to the bending of rigidlithosphere.

Tectonic uplift results indenudation (processes that wear away the earth's surface) by raising buried rocks closer to the surface. This process can redistribute large loads from an elevated region to a topographically lower area as well – thus promoting an isostatic response in the region of denudation (which can cause local bedrock uplift). The timing, magnitude, and rate of denudation can be estimated bygeologists using pressure-temperature studies.

Crustal thickening

[edit]

Crustal thickening has an upward component of motion and often occurs whencontinental crust isthrust onto continental crust. Basicallynappes (thrust sheets) from each plate collide and begin to stack one on top of the other; evidence of this process can be seen in preservedophiolitic nappes (preserved in theHimalayas) and in rocks with an invertedmetamorphic gradient. The preserved inverted metamorphic gradient indicates that nappes were actually stacked on top of each other so quickly that hot rocks did not have time to equilibrate before being thrust on top of cool rocks. The process of nappe stacking can only continue for so long, as gravity will eventually disallow further vertical growth (there is an upper limit to vertical mountain growth).

Density distribution of the crust and underlying mantle

[edit]
See also:Continental crust § Density

Although the raised surfaces ofmountain ranges mainly result from crustal thickening, there are other forces at play that are responsible for the tectonic activity. All tectonic processes are driven bygravitational force when density differences are present. A good example of this would be the large-scale circulation of theEarth's mantle. Lateral density variations near the surface (such as the creation, cooling, andsubduction ofoceanic plates) also driveplate motion.

The dynamics of mountain ranges are governed by differences in thegravitational energy of entirecolumns of the lithosphere (seeisostasy). If a change in surface height represents an isostatically compensated change in crustal thickness, the rate of change of potential energy per unit surface area is proportional to the rate of increase of average surface height. The highest rates of working against gravity are required when the thickness of the crust (not the lithosphere) changes.[1]

Lithospheric flexure

[edit]

Lithospheric flexure is the process by which the lithosphere bends under the action of forces such as the weight of a growingorogeny or changes in ice thickness related to glaciation. The lithosphere rests on theasthenosphere, a viscous layer that in geological time scales behaves like a fluid. Thus, when loaded, the lithosphere progressively reaches an isostatic equilibrium. For example, the lithosphere on the oceanward side of anoceanic trench at a subduction zone will curve upwards due to theelastic properties of the Earth's crust.

Orogenic uplift

[edit]
Main article:Orogeny

Orogenic uplift is the result of tectonic-plate collisions and results in mountain ranges or a more modest uplift over a large region. Perhaps the most extreme form of orogenic uplift is a continental-continental crustal collision. In this process, two continents are sutured together, and large mountain ranges are produced. The collision of theIndian andEurasian plates is a good example of the extent to which orogenic uplift can reach. Heavy thrust faulting (of the Indian plate beneath the Eurasian plate) andfolding are responsible for the suturing together of the two plates.[2] The collision of the Indian and Eurasian plates produced the Himalayas and is also responsible for crustal thickening north intoSiberia.[3] ThePamir Mountains,Tian Shan,Altai,Hindu Kush, and other mountain belts are all examples of mountain ranges formed in response to the collision of the Indian with the Eurasian plate.

TheOzark Plateau is a broad uplifted area which resulted from thePermianOuachita Orogeny to the south in the states ofArkansas,Oklahoma, andTexas. Another related uplift is theLlano Uplift in Texas, a geographical location named after its uplift features. TheColorado Plateau which includes theGrand Canyon is the result of broad tectonic uplift followed by rivererosion.[4]

When mountains rise slowly, either due to orogenic uplift or other processes (e.g.,rebound after glaciation), an unusual feature known as awater gap may occur. In these, erosion from a stream occurs faster than mountain uplift, resulting in agorge orvalley that runs through a mountain range from low-lying country on one side to similar country on the other. Examples of such water gaps include theManawatū Gorge in New Zealand and theCumberland Narrows inMaryland.

Isostatic uplift

[edit]

The removal of mass from a region will be isostatically compensated by crustal rebound. If we take into consideration typical crustal and mantle densities, erosion of an average 100 meters of rock across a broad, uniform surface will cause the crust to isostatically rebound about 85 meters and will cause only a 15-meter loss of mean surface elevation.[5] An example of isostatic uplift is post-glacial rebound following the melting ofice sheets. TheHudson Bay region of Canada, theGreat Lakes of Canada and the United States, andFennoscandia are currently undergoing gradual rebound as a result of the melting of ice sheets 10,000 years ago.

Crustal thickening, which for example is currently occurring in the Himalayas due to the continental collision between the Indian and the Eurasian plates, can also lead to surface uplift; but due to the isostatic sinking of thickened crust, the magnitude of surface uplift will only be about one-sixth of the amount of crustal thickening. Therefore, in mostconvergent boundaries, isostatic uplift plays a relatively small role, and high peak formation can be more attributed to tectonic processes.[6] Direct measures of the elevation change of the land surface can only be used to estimate erosion or bedrock uplift rates when other controls (such as changes in mean surface elevation, volume of eroded material, timescales and lags of isostatic response, variations in crustal density) are known.

Coral islands

[edit]

In a few cases, tectonic uplift can be seen incoral islands. This is evidenced by the presence of various oceanic islands composed entirely ofcoral, which otherwise appear to bevolcanic islands. Examples of such islands are found in the Pacific, notably the threephosphateislets ofNauru,Makatea, andBanaba, as well asMaré andLifou inNew Caledonia;Fatu Huku in theMarquesas Islands; andHenderson Island in thePitcairn Islands. The uplift of these islands is the result of the movement of oceanic tectonic plates. Sunken islands orguyots with their coral reefs are the result of crustal subsidence as the oceanic plate carries the islands to deeper or lower oceanic crust areas.

Uplift vs. exhumation

[edit]

The word "uplift" refers to displacement contrary to the direction of the gravity vector, and displacement is only defined when the object being displaced and the frame of reference is specified. Molnar and England[1] identify three kinds of displacement to which the term "uplift" is applied:

  1. Displacement of the Earth's surface with respect to thegeoid. This is what we refer to as "surface uplift"; and surface uplift can be defined by averaging elevation and changes in elevation over surface areas of a specified size.
  2. The "uplift of rocks" refers to the displacement of rocks with respect to the geoid.
  3. The displacement of rocks with respect to the surface is calledexhumation.

This simple equation relates the three kinds of displacement:

Surface uplift = uplift of rock – exhumation

The term geoid is used above to meanmean sea level and makes a good frame of reference. A given displacement within this frame of reference allows one to quantify the amount of work being done against gravity.

Measuring uplift and exhumation can be tricky. Measuring the uplift of a point requires measuring its elevation change – usually geoscientists are not trying to determine the uplift of a singular point but rather the uplift over a specified area. Accordingly, the change in elevation of all points on the surface of that area must be measured, and the rate of erosion must be zero or minimal. Also, sequences of rocks deposited during that uplift must be preserved. Needless to say, in mountain ranges where elevations are far above sea level these criteria are not easily met.Paleoclimatic restorations though can be valuable; these studies involve inferring changes in climate in an area of interest from changes with time of flora/fauna that is known to be sensitive to temperature and rainfall.[7] The magnitude of the exhumation a rock has been subjected to may be inferred fromgeothermobarometry (measuring previous pressure and temperature history of a rock or assemblage). Knowing the pressure and temperature history of a region can yield an estimate of the ambientgeothermal gradient and bounds on the exhumation process; however, geobarometric/geothermometric studies do not produce a rate of exhumation (or any other information on time). Exhumation rates can be inferred fromfission tracks and fromradiometric ages as long as a thermal profile can be estimated.

Gallery

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abEngland and Molnar, 1990,Surface uplift, uplift of rocks, and exhumation of rocks, Geology, v. 18 no. 12 p. 1173-1177Abstract
  2. ^Le Fort, Patrick. "Evolution of the Himalaya." (n.d.): 95-109. Print.
  3. ^Molnar, P., and P. Tapponnier. "Cenozoic Tectonics of Asia: Effects of a Continental Collision: Features of Recent Continental Tectonics in Asia Can Be Interpreted as Results of the India-Eurasia Collision." Science 189.4201 (1975): 419-26. Print.
  4. ^Karlstrom, K.E., et al., 2012,Mantle-driven dynamic uplift of the Rocky Mountains and Colorado Plateau and its surface response: Toward a unified hypothesis, Lithosphere, v. 4, p. 3–22abstract
  5. ^Burbank, Douglas W., and Anderson, Robert S. Tectonic Geomorphology. Chichester, West Sussex: J. Wiley & Sons, 2011. Print.
  6. ^Gilchrist, A. R., M. A. Summerfield, and H. A. P. Cockburn. "Landscape Dissection, Isostatic Uplift, and the Morphologic Development of Orogens." Geology 22.11 (1994): 963-966. Print.
  7. ^Burbank, Douglas West., and Robert S. Anderson. Tectonic Geomorphology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 2000.ISBN 978-0632043866

External links

[edit]
Geologic principles and processes
Stratigraphic principles
Petrologic principles
Geomorphologic processes
Sediment transport
Authority control databasesEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tectonic_uplift&oldid=1295779183"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp