Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Taurovenator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Extinct genus of theropod dinosaurs

Taurovenator
Temporal range:Late Cretaceous, (Cenomanian), ~95–93.9 Ma
Reconstruction of the head ofTaurovenator
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Kingdom:Animalia
Phylum:Chordata
Class:Reptilia
Clade:Dinosauria
Clade:Saurischia
Clade:Theropoda
Family:Carcharodontosauridae
Tribe:Giganotosaurini
Genus:Taurovenator
Motta et al., 2016
Type species
Taurovenator violantei
Motta et al., 2016

Taurovenator, fromLatintaurus, meaning "bull", andvenator, meaning "hunter", is an extinct genus of large, probablecarcharodontosauridtheropod dinosaurs that lived in what is now Argentina during theCenomanian age of theLate Cretaceous, around 95 to 93.9 million years ago. Initially only known from a singlepostorbital skull bone described from theHuincul Formation,Taurovenator violantei was named in 2016 by Argentine paleontologist Matias Motta and colleagues. Debate came about over the validity of the species, with some paleontologists arguing thatTaurovenator was synonymous with the earlier-named carcharodontosauridMapusaurus. However, the 2024 description of a well-preserved partial skull and skeleton referrable toTaurovenator aided in distinguishing the two taxa.

Discovery and naming

[edit]

Initial discovery and description

[edit]

In 2005, a rightpostorbital of atheropod dinosaur was unearthed by Argentine paleontologistMatias Motta from a section ofsandstonestrata deriving from the lower member of theHuincul Formation, dating to theCenomanian stage of theLate Cretaceous (95-93.9 million years old).[1] The strata located on the Violante Farm, a farm located inRio Negro Province, Argentina. This fossil was found in the vicinity of themegaraptoranAoniraptor, severalabelisauroids, and a possibleunenlagiineparavian.[2] The fossils recovered were then transported to theMuseo Provincial "Carlos Ameghino", with the isolated postorbital deposited under catalogue number MPCA-Pv 803.[2] This postorbital remained undescribed until in 2016, when Matias Motta and colleagues described the postorbital as theholotype (name-bearing specimen) of a newgenus andspecies ofcarcharodontosaurid dinosaur,Taurovenator violantei.Taurovenator was then the second carcharodontosaurid described from the Huincul Formation, withMapusaurus named in 2006 based on several incomplete skeletons.[3][4] The generic nameTaurovenator means "bull hunter", derived from theLatin rootstaurus "bull" andvenor "hunter" whereas the specific name is in honor of Violante Farm where the postorbital was unearthed.[2][1]

Validity debate and additional specimen

[edit]

Taurovenator went largely unnoticed due to its fragmentary nature,[5][1] with Coria et al. (2019) suggesting thatTaurovenator is synonymous withMapusaurus, considering both of its original autapomorphies as shared withMapusaurus and also pointing out that both taxa shared a curved lateral margin of thepalpebral.[6] Additionally, the authors considered that there was a high likelihood of them beingcoeval,[6] however,Taurovenator is actually from the lower unit of the Huincul Formation, whileMapusaurus is from the upper unit of the formation.[1] ResearcherMickey Mortimer also believed thatTaurovenator was synonymous withMapusaurus due to the lack of sufficient material and diagnostic traits for the genus.[7] In 2022, another carcharodontosaurid from the Huincul Formation,Meraxes, was named on the basis of a well-preserved skull and partial skeleton from the same strata asTaurovenator. In their description ofMeraxes, the authors stated thatTaurovenator lacks sufficient diagnostic characters and may be coeval withMeraxes.[5][1]

Notably in the same site on Violante Farm as theTaurovenator holotype, an associated skeleton (MPCA-Pv 803) including a partialskull and posterior (back portion)mandible, incompletecervical (neck vertebrae) series, fragments ofdorsal (back) vertebrae, severalribs, two partialforelimbs, afemur (thighbone), a partialpes (foot),gastralia, and acaudal vertebra was unearthed along with theTaurovenator holotype in 2005 but were regarded as belonging to an indeterminate carcharodontosaurid in the 2016 description ofTaurovenator. Additionally, the material of MPCA-Pv 803 had not been completely collected, prepared, or made available for study, delaying its description.[2][1] These fossils were also spread out over a sizeable area and intermingled with bones of an indeterminate sauropod. In 2024, this specimen was described and, despite not overlapping in material with the holotype, was referred toTaurovenator. This was done for several reasons: the holotype fits perfectly with MPCA-Pv 803 suggesting they may be from the same individual, the close proximity to the holotype (the specimen was found 800 metres (870 yd) away from the holotype's dig site, and the fossils are congruent in size. In an analysis of the strata from which the holotype was discovered, the 2024 study noted that the Huincul Formation is separated into two distinct sequences; a lower section of thin, multicolored sandstones and an upper section of thick conglomeratic sediments.Mapusaurus derives from the upper sequence of the formation, whereasMeraxes andTaurovenator are exclusive to the lower rock layers.Meraxes, however, was collected in strata close to the Candeleros-Huincul Formation boundary, whereasTaurovenator's specimens were found over 30 meters above the Candeleros-Huincul Formation limit. It is for these reasons that the three carcharodontosaurids found at Huincul were potentially not coeval, supporting the argument forTaurovenator's validity. Additionally, the holotype preserve features of theGiganotosaurini, further supporting its referral toTaurovenator. A new host of diagnostic traits were found on the bones of MPCA-Pv 803, properly demonstrating its distinctiveness fromMapusaurus andMeraxes.[1]

Description

[edit]

Taurovenator is a very large carcharodontosaurid. It had an estimated body mass of 5,728 kg (12,628 lb), 5.728 metric tons (6.314 short tons), based on a formula that utilizes the circumference of the femur to predict body mass. For reference, this is smaller thanGiganotosaurus 6,349 kilograms (13,997 lb), but larger thanMeraxes andMapusaurus, 4,263 kilograms (9,398 lb) and 4,343 kilograms (9,575 lb), respectively).[1][8] This putsTaurovenator among the largest theropod dinosaurs known and therefore one of the biggest terrestrial carnivores known to science, though still smaller than genera likeTyrannosaurus andSpinosaurus.[9][10][11][12]

Taurovenator life reconstruction, compared to a person.

Skull

[edit]

The skull ofTaurovenator is known from the holotype postorbital in addition to the cranial and mandibular elements of MPCA-Pv 803 which include: bothjugals (cheekbones), leftquadrate (skull bone articulating with the lower jaw), leftpalatine (main palate bone), rightectopterygoid (smaller palate bone), bothsurangulars andangulars (back of lower jaw bones),prearticulars (rearmost lower jaw bone), leftarticular (lower jaw bone articulating with the skull), rightceratohyal (throat bone), and three isolatedteeth. The maximum length of the skull of MPCA-Pv 803 was estimated to be around 135 centimetres (4.43 ft) based on the more complete skulls of relatives likeMeraxes. Thepostorbital is strongly rugose and projected out like a horn, markedly different from the orbital bosses of other carcharodontosaurids. Both Motta et al., 2016 and Rolando et al., 2024 consider this a unique trait,[2][1] but its sister taxonMeraxes too has a postorbital that was described as laterally projecting out like a horn.[5] The 2024 description of MPCA-Pv 803 however argued that this horn-like projection is distinct from that ofMeraxes, with the projection measuring 3–4 centimetres (1.2–1.6 in) in height and 2–3 centimetres (0.79–1.18 in) in diameter. In addition, there is a deepfossa (depression in bone) and excavation on the ventral surface of the postorbital. Though the excavations are observable in the postorbitals ofMapusaurus, Meraxes, and other carcharodontosaurids, they all do not preserve the unique fossa found on theTaurovenator holotype.[1][2][3]

The jugal is long and sub-triangular in shape with a slightlyposteromedially (backwards) pointed postorbitalramus. Itslateral (exposed side) surface is rugose with a thick shelf, a condition similarly observed in South American carcharodontosaurids likeTyrannotitan andMeraxes but absent from the jugals of otherallosauroids. The anterior (front)process of the jugal is compressed and bears an ovularpneumaticforamen (pits in bone for air sac systems) on its articulating (contacting) surface with thelacrimal. The quadrate of MPCA-PV 803 is distinctly stout, triangular in lateral view, bearing a large, anteriorly projected pterygoid flange as in related genera. The pterygoid fossa is wide, subdivided by a crest, and lacks pneumaticity as in contemporary carcharodontosaurids of its time. In contrast the palatine ofTaurovenator is tetraradiate with an anteriorly expanded vomeropterygoidprocess (expansion), a short and sub-triangular pterygoid process, a narrow jugal process, and an elongated maxillary process. The ectopterygoid is C-shaped from dorsoventral (top and bottom) views with a pneumaticrecess on its medial surface, a trait in other tetanurans. A distinguishing feature ofTaurovenator's pterygoid is the thin, long jugal process which is longer than those ofMeraxes andGiganotosaurus. As for themandible, only the posterior portion is known fromTaurovenator. It preserves a robust and dorsoventrally (top-down) high morphology, akin to the mandibles ofAcrocanthosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, and othertyrannosauroids. Two teeth are preserved fromTaurovenator, both of which are large, around 4 centimetres (1.6 in) in length. The margins of these teeth are convex and straight, with chisel-likedenticles which number around 8.5 per 5 millimetres (0.20 in) at the mid-crown and 11 per 5 millimetres (0.20 in) at the base. Their blood grooves are well developed and theirenamel wrinkles are notably deep,[1] a distinct characteristic of carcharodontosaurid teeth.[13][14]

Postcrania

[edit]

Distinctively, Taurovenator's neck vertebrae bore prominentneural spines with flange-like dorsal tips. As a result, the neural spines ofcervical vertebrae C3-C6 are "imbricated", ie interlocking with each other. The authors describing this morphology termed this unusual structure a "cervical complex", and likened them to overlapping roof tiles. A similar, though less extreme condition is also known in the C3-C5 of the more basal carcharodontosauridAcrocanthosaurus.[1][15] Available information ofGiganotosaurus andMapusaurus further suggests that this "cervical complex" is a uniquesynapomorphy of the group. The presence of the cervical complex would have likely restricted the range of movement of the cervical vertebrae. On the other hand, the skull ofTaurovenator and other carcharodontosaurids had a ball-shapedoccipital condyle similar to that seen in the skulls ofceratopsian dinosaurs. This could have allowed a large range of rotational movement between the skull and the first cervical vertebra. Furthermore, the cervical complex ofTaurovenator could have similar functional implications to those of thesyncervical vertebrae (ie fused C1-C3 vertebrae) of ceratopsians, strengthening the anterior region of the neck, and increasing the surface area for epaxial cervico-cranial muscles.[1]

Only remains of twodorsal vertebrae are known. One is composed of a centrum, but the other is composed of a very tall, 52 centimetres (20 in) high neural arch. This neural spine preserves strong laminae that form an "H"-shaped cross-section and a saddle shape at the top, traits found in the high-spinedAcrocanthosaurus. As for the appendicular skeleton, the forelimbs are nearly completely preserved, missing only the carpals and ungual phalanges.Taurovenator had proportionately some of the smallest arms of all knownallosauroids, being 65-68% of the length of the femur. The nearly completely preserved arms were reduced to a greater degree than even in other carcharodontosaurids, being proportionately smaller than that of taxa such asMeraxes, particularly where the forearm is concerned. Despite such limb reduction, the forearms were robust, and the digits had a great degree of flexibility. Nonetheless like other giganotosaurines, the forelimbs were likely incapable of a wide range of movement.[1] The left femur is known, with a preserved length of 113 centimetres (44 in) and an estimated complete length of 118 centimetres (46 in). The shaft of the femur is straightened with a weakfourth trochanter, a feature of many carcharodontosaurid femora.Taurovenator also shares withMeraxes an enlargedungual claw on the second toe, approximately 20% longer than the equivalentphalanx of the third toe and more laterally compressed.[1][2]

Classification

[edit]

Motta et al. (2016) suggested thatTaurovenator occupied a derived position within Carcharodontosauridae, comparing it toGiganotosaurus,Carcharodontosaurus andMapusaurus in particular.[2] Coria et al. (2019) suggested thatTaurovenator is synonymous withMapusaurus, considering both of its original autapomorphies as shared withMapusaurus and also pointing out that both taxa shared a curved lateral margin of thepalpebral.[6] Additionally, the authors considered that there was a high likelihood of them beingcoeval,[6] however,Taurovenator is actually from the lower unit of the Huincul Formation, whileMapusaurus is from the upper unit of the formation.[1] Rolando et al. (2024) reaffirmedTaurovenator's validity, considering the autapomorphies preserved on the holotype as more strongly developed inTaurovenator than any other carcharodontosaurid, while also considering the supposedly diagnostic curved margin of the palpebral as a more widely distributed feature in Carcharodontosauridae.[1]

In order to test the systematics ofTaurovenator with the information supplemented by the new specimen, the study used the phylogenetic dataset used in the description ofMeraxes, with some additional data. The results of their phylogenetic analysis are shown in a cladogram below:[1][5]

Carcharodontosauridae

In 2025, Cau and Paterna recoveredTaurovenator as anallosauroid outside Carcharodontosauridae.[16]

Carnosauria
Megalosauroidea
phylogenetic position ofEocarcharia (holotype + skull roof)
Allosauroidea
phylogenetic position of the referred "Eocarcharia" maxilla

Palaeoenvironment

[edit]
Silhouettes of dinosaurs from the Huincul Formation as size comparison
Several dinosaurs from theHuincul Formation (Taurovenator is not figured)

Taurovenator was discovered in the Argentine Province ofNeuquén. It was found in the Huincul Formation, a rock formation bordering theRío Limay Subgroup, the latter of which is a subdivision of theNeuquén Group. Thisunit is located in theNeuquén Basin inPatagonia. The Huincul Formation is composed of yellowish and greenishsandstones of fine-to-medium grain, some of which aretuffaceous.[17] These deposits were laid down during the Upper Cretaceous, either in the middleCenomanian to earlyTuronian stages[2] or the early Turonian to lateSantonian.[18] The deposits represent thedrainage system of abraided river.[19]

Fossilised pollen indicates a wide variety of plants were present in the Huincul Formation. A study of the El Zampal section of the formation foundhornworts,liverworts,ferns,Selaginellales, possibleNoeggerathiales,gymnosperms (includinggnetophytes andconifers), andangiosperms (flowering plants), in addition to several pollen grains of unknown affinities.[20] The Huincul Formation is among the richest Patagonian vertebrate associations, preserving fish includingdipnoans andgar,chelid turtles,squamates,sphenodonts,neosuchiancrocodilians, and a wide variety of dinosaurs.[2][21] Vertebrates are most commonly found in the lower, and therefore older, part of the formation.[22]

In addition toTaurovenator, the theropods of the Huincul Formation are represented by the other giant carcharodontosauridsMeraxes andMapusaurus,abelisaurids includingSkorpiovenator,[23]Ilokelesia, andTralkasaurus,[24]noasaurids such asHuinculsaurus,[25]paravians such asOveroraptor,[26] and other theropods such asAoniraptor andGualicho[27] have also been discovered there.[2] Severaliguanodonts are also present in the Huincul Formation.[17] Thesauropods of the Huincul Formation are represented by thetitanosaursArgentinosaurus andChoconsaurus,[28] and severalrebbachisaurids includingCathartesaura,[29]Limaysaurus,[30][31] and some unnamed species.[22]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrRolando, Alexis M. Aranciaga; Motta, Matías J.; Agnolín, Federico L.; Tsuihiji, Takanobu; Miner, Santiago; Brissón-Egli, Federico; Novas, Fernando E. (9 October 2024). "A new carcharodontosaurid specimen sheds light on the anatomy of South American giant predatory dinosaurs".The Science of Nature.111 (6): 56.Bibcode:2024SciNa.111...56R.doi:10.1007/s00114-024-01942-4.ISSN 1432-1904.PMID 39382666.S2CID 273199114.
  2. ^abcdefghijkMotta, Matías J.; Aranciaga Rolando, Alexis M.; Rozadilla, Sebastián; Agnolín, Federico E.; Chimento, Nicolás R.; Egli, Federico Brissón; Novas, Fernando E. (June 2016)."New theropod fauna from the Upper Cretaceous (Huincul Formation) of northwestern Patagonia, Argentina".New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin.71:231–253 – via ResearchGate.
  3. ^abCoria, R. A., & Currie, P. J. (2006).A new carcharodontosaurid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Argentina.Geodiversitas,28(1), 71-118.
  4. ^Canale, Juan Ignacio; Novas, Fernando Emilio; Salgado, Leonardo; Coria, Rodolfo Aníbal (1 December 2015)."Cranial ontogenetic variation in Mapusaurus roseae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) and the probable role of heterochrony in carcharodontosaurid evolution".Paläontologische Zeitschrift.89 (4):983–993.Bibcode:2015PalZ...89..983C.doi:10.1007/s12542-014-0251-3.hdl:11336/19258.ISSN 1867-6812.
  5. ^abcdCanale, Juan I.; Apesteguía, Sebastián; Gallina, Pablo A.; Mitchell, Jonathan; Smith, Nathan D.; Cullen, Thomas M.; Shinya, Akiko; Haluza, Alejandro; Gianechini, Federico A.; Makovicky, Peter J. (July 2022)."New giant carnivorous dinosaur reveals convergent evolutionary trends in theropod arm reduction".Current Biology.32 (14): 3195–3202.e5.Bibcode:2022CBio...32E3195C.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.05.057.PMID 35803271.S2CID 250343124.
  6. ^abcdCoria, Rodolfo A.; Currie, Philip J.; Ortega, Francisco; Baiano, Mattia A. (2019). "An Early Cretaceous, medium-sized carcharodontosaurid theropod (Dinosauria, Saurischia) from the Mulichinco Formation (upper Valanginian), Neuquén Province, Patagonia, Argentina".Cretaceous Research.111 104319.Bibcode:2020CrRes.11104319C.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2019.104319.hdl:11336/122794.
  7. ^"The Theropod Database".theropoddatabase.github.io. Retrieved6 March 2025.
  8. ^Campione, Nicolás E.; Evans, David C.; Brown, Caleb M.; Carrano, Matthew T. (4 July 2014). Revell, Liam (ed.)."Body mass estimation in non-avian bipeds using a theoretical conversion to quadruped stylopodial proportions".Methods in Ecology and Evolution.5 (9):913–923.Bibcode:2014MEcEv...5..913C.doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12226.ISSN 2041-210X.
  9. ^Persons IV, W. Scott; Currie, Philip J.; Erickson, Gregory M. (2020)."An Older and Exceptionally Large Adult Specimen of".The Anatomical Record.303 (4):656–672.doi:10.1002/ar.24118.ISSN 1932-8494.PMID 30897281.
  10. ^Hutchinson, John R.; Bates, Karl T.; Molnar, Julia; Allen, Vivian; Makovicky, Peter J. (12 October 2011)."A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth".PLOS ONE.6 (10) e26037.Bibcode:2011PLoSO...626037H.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.ISSN 1932-6203.PMC 3192160.PMID 22022500.
  11. ^Sereno, Paul C; Myhrvold, Nathan; Henderson, Donald M; Fish, Frank E; Vidal, Daniel; Baumgart, Stephanie L; Keillor, Tyler M; Formoso, Kiersten K; Conroy, Lauren L (30 November 2022). Zhu, Min; Rutz, Christian; Zhu, Min; Holtz, Thomas R; Hone, David (eds.)."Spinosaurus is not an aquatic dinosaur".eLife.11 e80092.doi:10.7554/eLife.80092.ISSN 2050-084X.PMC 9711522.PMID 36448670.
  12. ^Ibrahim, Nizar; Sereno, Paul C.; Dal Sasso, Cristiano; Maganuco, Simone; Fabbri, Matteo; Martill, David M.; Zouhri, Samir; Myhrvold, Nathan; Iurino, Dawid A. (26 September 2014)."Semiaquatic adaptations in a giant predatory dinosaur".Science.345 (6204):1613–1616.Bibcode:2014Sci...345.1613I.doi:10.1126/science.1258750.PMID 25213375.
  13. ^Farlow, J. O., Brinkman, D. L., Abler, W. L., & Currie, P. J. (1991).Size, shape, and serration density of theropod dinosaur lateral teeth.Modern Geology,16(1-2), 161-198.
  14. ^Brusatte, Stephen L.; Benson, Roger B. J.; Carr, Thomas D.; Williamson, Thomas E.; Sereno, Paul C. (12 December 2007)."The systematic utility of theropod enamel wrinkles".Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.27 (4): 1052.doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2007)27[1052:tsuote]2.0.co;2.
  15. ^Harrid, Jerald David (1998).A reanalysis of Acrocanthosaurus atokensis, its phylogenetic status, and paleobiogeographic implications, based on a new specimen from Texas. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science (published 1 January 1998).
  16. ^Cau, Andrea; Paterna, Alessandro (May 2025)."Beyond the Stromer's Riddle: the impact of lumping and splitting hypotheses on the systematics of the giant predatory dinosaurs from northern Africa"(PDF).Italian Journal of Geosciences.144 (2):162–185.doi:10.3301/IJG.2025.10.
  17. ^abLeanza, H.A; Apesteguı́a, S.; Novas, F.E; de la Fuente, M.S. (1 February 2004). "Cretaceous terrestrial beds from the Neuquén Basin (Argentina) and their tetrapod assemblages".Cretaceous Research.25 (1):61–87.Bibcode:2004CrRes..25...61L.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2003.10.005.ISSN 0195-6671.
  18. ^Corbella, H.; Novas, F.E.; Apesteguía, S.; Leanza, H. (2004)."First fission-track age for the dinosaur-bearing Neuquén Group (Upper Cretaceous), Neuquén Basin, Argentina".Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. Nueva Serie.6 (21): 227=232.doi:10.22179/REVMACN.6.84.
  19. ^Rainoldi, A.L.; Franchini, Marta; Beaufort, D.; Mozley, P.; Giusiano, A.; Nora, C.; Patrier, P.; Impiccini, A.; Pons, J. (2015)."Mineral reactions associated with hydrocarbon paleomigration in the Huincul High, Neuquén Basin, Argentina".GSA Bulletin.127 (11–12):1711–1729.Bibcode:2015GSAB..127.1711R.doi:10.1130/B31201.1.hdl:11336/36686.
  20. ^Vallati, P. (2001)."Middle cretaceous microflora from the Huincul Formation ("Dinosaurian Beds") in the Neuquén Basin, Patagonia, Argentina".Palynology.25 (1):179–197.Bibcode:2001Paly...25..179V.doi:10.2113/0250179.
  21. ^Motta, M.J.; Brissón Egli, F.; Aranciaga Rolando, A.M.; Rozadilla, S.; Gentil, A. R.; Lio, G.; Cerroni, M.; Garcia Marsà, J.; Agnolín, F. L.; D'Angelo, J. S.; Álvarez-Herrera, G. P.; Alsina, C.H.; Novas, F.E. (2019)."New vertebrate remains from the Huincul Formation (Cenomanian–Turonian;Upper Cretaceous) in Río Negro, Argentina".Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina.19 (1): R26.doi:10.5710/PEAPA.15.04.2019.295.hdl:11336/161858.S2CID 127726069.Archived from the original on 14 December 2019. Retrieved14 December 2019.
  22. ^abBellardini, F.; Filippi, L.S. (2018). "New evidence of saurischian dinosaurs from the upper member of the Huincul Formation (Cenomanian) of Neuquén Province, Patagonia, Argentina".Reunión de Comunicaciones de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina: 10.
  23. ^Canale, J.I.; Scanferla, C.A.; Agnolin, F.L.; Novas, F.E. (2009). "New carnivorous dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of NW Patagonia and the evolution of abelisaurid theropods".Naturwissenschaften.96 (3):409–14.Bibcode:2009NW.....96..409C.doi:10.1007/s00114-008-0487-4.hdl:11336/52024.PMID 19057888.S2CID 23619863.
  24. ^Cerroni, M.A.; Motta, M.J.; Agnolín, F.L.; Aranciaga Rolando, A.M.; Brissón Egliab, F.; Novas, F.E. (2020). "A new abelisaurid from the Huincul Formation (Cenomanian-Turonian; Upper Cretaceous) of Río Negro province, Argentina".Journal of South American Earth Sciences.98 102445.Bibcode:2020JSAES..9802445C.doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102445.S2CID 213781725.
  25. ^Baiano, M.A.; Coria, R.A.; Cau, A. (2020). "A new abelisauroid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Huincul Formation (lower Upper Cretaceous, Neuquén Basin) of Patagonia, Argentina".Cretaceous Research.110 104408.Bibcode:2020CrRes.11004408B.doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104408.S2CID 214118853.
  26. ^Matías J. Motta; Federico L. Agnolín; Federico Brissón Egli; Fernando E. Novas (2020). "New theropod dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia sheds light on the paravian radiation in Gondwana".The Science of Nature.107 (3) 24.Bibcode:2020SciNa.107...24M.doi:10.1007/s00114-020-01682-1.hdl:11336/135530.PMID 32468191.S2CID 218913199.
  27. ^Apesteguía, S.; Smith, N.D.; Juárez Valieri, R.; Makovicky, P.J. (2016)."An unusual new theropod with a didactyl manus from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina".PLOS ONE.11 (7) e0157793.Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1157793A.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157793.PMC 4943716.PMID 27410683.
  28. ^Simón, E.; Salgado, L.; Calvo, J.O. (2017). "A new titanosaur sauropod from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Neuquén Province, Argentina".Ameghiniana.55 (1):1–29.doi:10.5710/AMGH.01.08.2017.3051.hdl:11336/89326.S2CID 134332465.
  29. ^de Jesus Faria, C.C.; Riga, B.G.; dos Anjos Candeiro, C.R.; da Silva Marinho, T.; David, L.O.; Simbras, F.M.; Castanho, R.B.; Muniz, F.P.; Gomes da Costa Pereira, P.V.L. (1 August 2015). "Cretaceous sauropod diversity and taxonomic succession in South America".Journal of South American Earth Sciences.61:154–163.Bibcode:2015JSAES..61..154D.doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2014.11.008.hdl:11336/37899.ISSN 0895-9811.
  30. ^Calvo, J.O.; Salgado, L. (1995)."Rebbachisaurus tessonei sp. nov. a new Sauropoda from the Albian-Cenomanian of Argentina; new evidence on the origin of the Diplodocidae".Gaia.11:13–33.
  31. ^Salgado, L.; Garrido, A.; Cocca, S.E.; Cocca, J.R. (2004)."Lower Cretaceous rebbachisaurid sauropods from Cerro Aguada del León (Lohan Cura Formation), Neuquén Province, northwestern Patagonia, Argentina".Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.24 (4):903–912.doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2004)024[0903:lcrsfc]2.0.co;2.S2CID 129233849.
Avemetatarsalia
Theropoda
    • see below↓
Coelophysoidea
Coelophysidae
Averostra
    • see below↓
Dubious neotheropods
Coelophysis bauri
Dilophosaurus wetherilli
Ceratosauridae
Abelisauroidea
Noasauridae
Elaphrosaurinae
Noasaurinae
Abelisauridae
Majungasaurinae
Carnotaurinae
Brachyrostra
Furileusauria
Tetanurae
    • see below↓
Ceratosaurus nasicornis
Limusaurus inextricabilis
Rajasaurus narmadensis
Aucasaurus garridoi
Piatnitzkysauridae
Megalosauridae
Megalosaurinae
Afrovenatorinae
Baryonychinae
Ceratosuchopsini
Spinosaurinae
Spinosaurini
Avetheropoda
    • see below↓
Piatnitzkysaurus floresi

Torvosaurus tanneri

Spinosaurus aegyptiacus
Metriacanthosauridae
Metriacanthosaurinae
Allosauridae
Carcharodontosauria
Neovenatoridae
Carcharodontosauridae
Carcharodontosaurinae
Giganotosaurini
Megaraptora?
Megaraptoridae
Coelurosauria
    • see below↓
Xuanhanosaurus qilixiaensis
Allosaurus fragilis

Neovenator saleriiCarcharodontosaurus saharicus

Australovenator wintonensis
Coeluridae?
Proceratosauridae
Albertosaurinae
Tyrannosaurinae
Alioramini
Daspletosaurini
Teratophoneini
Tyrannosaurini
Maniraptoromorpha
    • see below↓
Dubious coelurosaurs
Zuolong salleei
Stokesosaurus clevelandi

Alioramus remotus

Tarbosaurus bataar
Compsognathidae
Sinosauropterygidae?
Ornithomimosauria
Macrocheiriformes
Deinocheiridae
Ornithomimidae
Maniraptora
Sinosauropteryx prima

Deinocheirus mirificus

Qiupalong henanensis
Taurovenator
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Taurovenator&oldid=1318929834"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp