This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

ChinaMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofChina related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale. TelecommunicationsHigh‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofTelecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications High This article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale. CompaniesHigh‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcompanies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany High This article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests :Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess :Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit :Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox :Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain :Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located atCategory:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the{{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the{{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answerrequests for comments

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly thoserepresenting the subject of the article, arestrongly advised not to directly edit the article. SeeWikipedia:Conflict of interest. You mayrequest corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, orcontact us if the issue is urgent.

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than90 days may be automatically archived byClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

"ZTE was fined a total of US$1.19 billion by the U.S. Department of Commerce of President Donald J. Trump " -- The last part of this sentence seems strange. Is there some special reason it is included?Kdammers (talk)10:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How did it come that the Ministry of Aerospace (missingIndustry?) did business with telecommunication industry? And the reference [8] reveals nothing relevant with the MoA(E). --Flycici (talk)13:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Flycici: Did you knowChina Aerospace International Holdings was in fact a plastic factory? It is weird in China that in the 1980s, every ministry start their own for-profit business on top of strategic industry, so it is not so weird for ZTE owner.Lenovo was owned byLegend Holdings, which in turn significantly owned byChinese Academy of Sciences. Also,Peking University was the owner ofFounder Group and real estate developerPeking University Resources (Holdings). Despite it is clear that Ministry of Aerospace is part owner of ZTE, the elaboration of the relations should be supported byWP:RS.Matthew hk (talk)19:02, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Right now the information on US sanctions and import ban on ZTE is in the history section but there is also a controversies section at the end that includes information on the US, Philippines and Norway. This gives the U.S. actions more weight- should the information to the controversies section or its own section?Srbsf7 (talk)02:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The controversies section should probably be integrated into the company's history and not be a stand-alone 'Controversy' section perWP:CSECTION. -Amigao (talk)20:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chairman info is date from 2017, a update press release from zte web site have a new chairman.— Precedingunsigned comment added by2804:10BC:432:8500:A522:180:4299:2F66 (talk)22:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Amigao: What is your reasoning to remove sourced information that shows The context that even most western firms headquartered in EU, are not divesting from Russia? It is very misleading and frankly an unfair criticism to single out ZTE and make it seem like they are the very few companies refusing to divest. Because that's giving a false impression. If you disagree I suggest we take it to neutral pov noticeboard as I believe such context is not only necessary. It is absolutely critical to not mislead others in thinking that ZTE is doing something that most companies in the world isn't doing. Context is very necessary here to not mislead.Truth721 (talk)21:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need aWP:RS that actually mentions ZTE for such context. -Amigao (talk)21:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Checkuser note: {[noping|Truth721}} has been blocked as a sock.--Ponyo^{bons mots}21:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• B-Class China-related articles
• Mid-importance China-related articles
• B-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
• WikiProject China articles
• B-Class Telecommunications articles
• High-importance Telecommunications articles
• B-Class company articles
• High-importance company articles
• WikiProject Companies articles