Talk:ZTE
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly thoserepresenting the subject of the article, arestrongly advised not to directly edit the article. SeeWikipedia:Conflict of interest. You mayrequest corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, orcontact us if the issue is urgent. |
There are far too many references to the ZTE web sites. The whole page feels like a ZTE press release.Sanpitch (talk)05:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I think it is pretty balanced given the whoel conterversy part seems to make it feel like they are slamming the company for being a 'strong' supporter of ethical behavior....—Precedingunsigned comment added by207.141.105.2 (talk)20:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know why you think there are too many ZTE official refs. I can't respond because I don't know why citing press releases is a bad thing.Fleetham (talk)00:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's stupid to cite press releases because this is not ZTE's web site, it's Wikipedia. SeeWP:SOAP.Sanpitch (talk)03:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I should find out more about ZTE. I don't think simply using press releases violates that SOAP policy, however. Using third-party, independent sources would hopefully not "enliven" the article with contradictory information but should deepen it's breadth and broaden its depth, instead.Fleetham (talk)03:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think there should not be such a comprehensive list of customers.
ZTE MF620 is used byMovistar. What about the Linux drivers?. --Mac (talk)11:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Someone tagged the page with:
 | This articlemay beunbalanced toward certain viewpoints. Pleaseimprove the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on thetalk page. |
and:
| Theneutrality of this article isdisputed. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please do not remove this message untilconditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
...but I don't think it's warranted. I will remove them soon unless someone objects.Fleetham (talk)06:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
removed "unbalanced" tag. left pov-check because there are a lot of official site cites.Fleetham (talk)05:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No mention is made of their market dominance in the Mobile Broadband sector, particularly 3GSM dongles and Mobile Broadband routing equipemnt for service providers.Also no mention of world firsthttp://wwwen.zte.com.cn/en/press_center/news/201002/t20100211_180344.html, first 4g network card.some references:http://www.strategyanalytics.com/default.aspx?mod=pressreleaseviewer&a0=4896http://www.cn-c114.net/583/a521245.htmlhttp://www.rethink-wireless.com/2011/02/01/huawei-zte-continue-wireless-growth.htmJavaByte (talk)15:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ZTE to Launch High-End Smartphone in U.S. DECEMBER 8, 2011, 6:56 A.M. ET (page B7 in print)Wall Street Journal by YUN-HEE KIM, excerpt ...
ZTE Corp. plans to launch a high-endsmartphone in theU.S. in the middle of next year, an executive said, marking a change from its low-cost emphasis and putting it in head-to-head competition with the likes ofApple Inc.,HTC Corp.,Samsung Electronics Co. andNokia Corp. in a high-end market that's growing ever more crowded. "By 2015, we expect the U.S. to be the largest market for handsets for ZTE," Lixin Cheng, president of theChinese company'sNorth American region, said in an interview Wednesday inHong Kong.
The source sentences, from the already given cite, for my addition that was reverted is:
and
I think those fully justify my addition of "However many of these U.S. products, possibly all, do not require an export license. There are no current international restrictions on exporting telecommunications equipment to Iran.", and I will reinstate it unless anyone can explain why my precis of the already given source id flawed.Rwendland (talk)18:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link onZTE. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online02:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onZTE. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 05:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
OKJim.henderson (talk)03:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As of right now, ZTE as a company still exists. They could theoretically come out of it (albeit unlikely). Allthe filing (pdf warning) says is that they're ending major operations, but it does specifically state that they have enough money to comply with commercial and legal requirements.Frood03:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"ZTE was fined a total of US$1.19 billion by the U.S. Department of Commerce of President Donald J. Trump " -- The last part of this sentence seems strange. Is there some special reason it is included?Kdammers (talk)10:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How did it come that the Ministry of Aerospace (missingIndustry?) did business with telecommunication industry? And the reference [8] reveals nothing relevant with the MoA(E). --Flycici (talk)13:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Right now the information on US sanctions and import ban on ZTE is in the history section but there is also a controversies section at the end that includes information on the US, Philippines and Norway. This gives the U.S. actions more weight- should the information to the controversies section or its own section?Srbsf7 (talk)02:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Chairman info is date from 2017, a update press release from zte web site have a new chairman.— Precedingunsigned comment added by2804:10BC:432:8500:A522:180:4299:2F66 (talk)22:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Amigao: What is your reasoning to remove sourced information that shows The context that even most western firms headquartered in EU, are not divesting from Russia? It is very misleading and frankly an unfair criticism to single out ZTE and make it seem like they are the very few companies refusing to divest. Because that's giving a false impression. If you disagree I suggest we take it to neutral pov noticeboard as I believe such context is not only necessary. It is absolutely critical to not mislead others in thinking that ZTE is doing something that most companies in the world isn't doing. Context is very necessary here to not mislead.Truth721 (talk)21:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
