![]() | This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipediacontributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may includeconflict of interest,autobiography, andneutral point of view. |
There are many complaints that Google is strong-arming people into highly unfavourable contract terms.Zoë Keating appears to be one of the most notable complainers.
71.41.210.146 (talk)19:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I added hatnote based on sources I found which discuss confusion between YouTube Red andRedTube:
--Mika1h (talk)00:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed this before and see Mika1h continues to put it back. Just re-removed it. This is a major misuse of the distinguish template: it is not for "a clickbait article somewhere got to talk about a porn site OMG!" It is specifically for the following case: a user wants to get to article A, but uses term B, so there needs to be a hatnote saying "wait did you mean A." This makes sense for something likeGrenada vs.Granada. It makes 0 sense here. You need to be *interested* in the porn site, but not remember its name quite right, and think "huh, YouTube Red, that was the name of the porn site I'm interested in, right?" No way. If anything, I could see the argument in reverse - that someone thinking of YT's subscription service might shorten it to "Redtube" - but nobody would arbitarirly *lengthen* the name. (Maybe they might think "Red YouTube? But I doubt it.") This is just trivia.SnowFire (talk)19:09, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't this mention MatPat's Game Lab at all?— Precedingunsigned comment added by75.141.57.22 (talk)19:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should we make a page for Paranormal Action Squad?Crazybob2014 (talk)15:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In a few places in the article it reads like promotional material stating that ads are removed for subscribers. This is rather misleading, as all ads that creators integrate into their videos and associated product placement are still visible. The wording in these places definitely needs to clarify this, because it kind of feels like a bit of a bait-and-switch when you sign up and then realize that there are still ads.
The distinction between the two as "advertisements" is unnecessary. Sponsorships (in-video "ads") are on an individual channel level. Advertisements are present across all monetized videos. There's a distinction between the two present in the difference in words. Sponsorships are individual; a channel gets a sponsorship fromx brand, they give a plug for said company. Youtube content creators do not put the YouTube definition of "advertisements" into their comments. No need to clear up language. Watching content creators with brand sponsorships is a choice.Thatdave (talk)09:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks guys to whoever did this, I thank you.
I got a message with "Flooded with them hundreds" what does this mean?
GDanthonyYT (talk)GDanthonyYT
The paragraph underneathLicensing Terms referring to ESPN's YouTube channel is currently incorrect and needs to be updated. Videos on the primary channel are being uploaded daily, and are available in the U.S. (A YouTube premium region).Thatdave (talk)06:58, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
the page is not updated with latest available location of YouTube PremiumDoriyaphirbhikam (talk)06:46, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]