Talk:Xipe Totec
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | A fact fromXipe Totec appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theDid you know column on 31 January 2009, and was viewed approximately 5,409 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
would like to write a short story on xipe for a fantasy magazine...need more references. this helps but need more details.
62.6.139.1014:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC)Do some research then! Don't be so lazy[reply]
I thought Sacrificial victums of this god were bound and then shot to death with arrows.Tourskin23:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
From what I have read, I think the article is right as it stands, although a bit on the skimpy side. I could be wrong though, and I don't think there are any eye-witnesses left to set us right if we are. --Dumbo122:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Xipe Totec (also known as "Orlando") appears as a villain in Grant Morrison's occult comicThe Invisibles.—Precedingunsigned comment added by71.146.32.39 (talk)19:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've been contacted by an academic concerned that these two images are post-Conquest fakes - pending checking up on this, which hopefully I'll be able to do shortly, I've moved them to the talkpage. I suspect that if this is the case, reinstating them and clearly labelling them as such is okay, but I'll defer to others!Andrew Gray (talk)23:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, all these sources use "Xipe-Totec". --Giggette (talk)05:23, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Primo Feliciano Velázquez (1975). Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas (ed.).Códice Chimalpopoca. Anales de Cuauhtitlán y Leyenda de los Soles (in Spanish). México. p. 161.ISBN 968-36-2747-1.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)- Adela Fernández (1998). Panorama Editorial (ed.).Dioses Prehispánicos de México (in Spanish). México. p. 162.ISBN 968-38-0306-7.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)- Cecilio Agustín Robelo (1905). Biblioteca Porrúa. Imprenta del Museo Nacional de Arqueología, Historia y Etnología (ed.).Diccionario de Mitología Nahua (in Spanish). México. p. 851.ISBN 978-9684327955.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)- Otilia Meza (1981). Editorial Universo México (ed.).El Mundo Mágico de los Dioses del Anáhuac (in Spanish). México. p. 153.ISBN 968-35-0093-5.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)- Patricia Turner and Charles Russell Coulter (2001). Oxford University Press (ed.).Dictionary of Ancient Deities. United States. p. 608.ISBN 0-19-514504-6.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)- Michael Jordan. Library of Congress (ed.).Dictionary of Gods and Goddesses. United States. p. 402.ISBN 0-8160-5923-3.
{{cite book}}:Unknown parameter|année=ignored (|date=suggested) (help);Unknown parameter|langue=ignored (|language=suggested) (help)- Nowotny, Karl Anton. Norman : University of Oklahoma Press, c2005 (ed.).Tlacuilolli: Style and Contents of the Mexican Pictorial Manuscripts with a Catalog of the Borgia Group. p. 402.ISBN 978-0806136530.
{{cite book}}:Unknown parameter|année=ignored (|date=suggested) (help);Unknown parameter|langue=ignored (|language=suggested) (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: editors list (link)- François-Marie Bertrand (1881). Migne (ed.).Dictionnaire universel, historique et comparatif, de toutes les religions du monde : comprenant le judaisme, le christianisme, le paganisme, le sabéisme, le magisme, le druidisme, le brahmanisme, le bouddhismé, le chamisme, l'islamisme, le fétichisme; Volumen 1,2,3,4 (in French). France. p. 602.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Well, my copy of Fernandez definitely uses "Xipe Totec", not "Xipe-Totec". I can give a much longer list of sources using the "Xipe Totec" form, but it's far easier to Google and see for yourself. Almost all the sources I used when writing the article use "Xipe Totec", the one exception being the website of the Museo de América. If the cited sources (and the majority of the literature) use "Xipe Totec", that's what we should stick with.Simon Burchell (talk)09:03, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
SeeGoogle Books, not one instance of "Xipe-Totec" is on the first page of the search result (except the Wikipedia page that you renamed, which doesn't count), orGoogle Shcolar, likewise.Simon Burchell (talk)10:58, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onXipe Totec. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)00:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
AP article on recent discovery:https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/mexico-finds-first-flayed-god-temple-priests-wore-dead-people-n954241 I will leave it to a subject matter expert to determine if/how this should be included in this article. --Fru1tbat (talk)18:36, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Found little to none information about the mithology and fanatical obsesión on the fact that there were human sacrifices 🤷TlaloqueNahuaque (talk)13:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)14:09, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
