| Skip to table of contents |
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theWomen in Iran article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1Auto-archiving period:3 months |
| This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thecomparison table falls underWP:DISPUTED because it doesn't take into account the change in cultural trends. The rise in literacy rates for instance cannot be simply attributed to the Islamic regime.--AnarchistFakest (talk)01:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I check pages listed inCategory:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content fororphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some ofWomen in Iran's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct forthis article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "books.google.se":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.AnomieBOT⚡15:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)20:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Many things are occuring twice and it should be merged.DerEchteJoan (talk)21:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]