Talk:Wilhelm Adam
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The result of the move request was:moved. Moved the general as well because that seems to be the standard naming practice.Jenks24 (talk)22:32, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
– The politician has received 1413 views, while the army general has received 447 views. I think that this is enough to change the politician to the primary, and also the general's disambiguation as a "soldier" seems like a bit of a misnomer to me.Hoops gza (talk)22:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I culled the material that has been uncited since 2016, providing intricate detail about the subject's early career, which is unlikely to be available in RS. I'm preserving this material by providingthis link.K.e.coffman (talk)02:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)04:53, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
