This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theWEi article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
This article must adhere to thebiographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced orpoorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentiallylibellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue tothis noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please seethis help page. |
![]() | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 24 July 2021, it was proposed that this article bemoved fromWei (band) toWEi. The result of the discussion wasmoved. |
There is a move discussion in progress onTalk:2AM (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot20:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress onTalk:1:43 (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot03:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress onTalk:1:43 (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot10:32, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was:moved.(non-admin closure)Colonestarrice (talk)15:52, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wei (band) →WEi – The current page title does not adhere to naming conventions as outlined byMOS:TM. Article titles are meant to reflect"styles already in use byindependentreliable sources." Additionally, Wikipedia does not exist to modify every form of unusual stylization to confirm to rules of the English language:"Do not invent new styles that are not used by independent reliable sources.". The current title violates this guidance. Reliable sources have seemingly never used "Wei" when referring to this group, they have used "WEi". This is demonstrated by an array of high-end English-language sources which includeRolling Stone India[1],The Korea Herald[2],The Korea Times[3],ABS-CBN[4],Korea JoongAng Daily[5],Yonhap News Agency[6],The Star[7],Forbes[8],Hindustan Times[9],Manila Bulletin[10], and so on.MOS:TMRULESspecifically states:When a name is almost never written except in a particular stylized form, use that form on Wikipedia:Deadmau5,3M,2 Fast 2 Furious". This is clearly one of those cases and we should be usingWEi as the title.✗plicit14:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{Other uses|Wei (disambiguation)}}
could be added atop the article.✗plicit23:40, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]Hi everyone, I was just thinking about one thing in the "History" section. The last paragraph is named [2024-present: Japanese comeback, digital single album and 7th Mini Album]: isn't it a bit overloaded? It might be just me but I feel like too many different things are put in just one paragraph (also we have to take into account that in 2024 WEi had no official promotions on stage), so what I propose is to divide 2024 and make it a standalone paragraph with a possible title [2024: Japanese comeback and digital single album], then refer to 2025 as in [2025-present: comeback with 7th Mini Album]. That'd also explain better the sentence in the paragraph about WEi making their comeback after 1 year and 7 months. I'd like to know how you feel about my suggestion. Let me know! Thank youWeiright (talk)20:40, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]