Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Turning Point USA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theTurning Point USA article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1,2,3,4Auto-archiving period:2 months 
Warning: active arbitration remedies

Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except inlimited circumstances)
  • Changes challenged by reversion may not be reinstated without affirmative consensus on the talk page

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information
Enforcement procedures:
  • Violations of any of these restrictions should be reportedimmediately to thearbitration enforcement noticeboard.
  • Editors who areaware of this topic being designated a contentious topic and who violate these restrictions may besanctioned by any uninvolved administrator, even on afirst offense.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

  • Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from alledit-warring restrictions.
  • Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as obvious vandalism.
  • In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
  • Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors are exempt from the 1RR but are subject tothe usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
  • Whenever you are relying on one of these exemptions, you should refer to it in youredit summary and, if applicable, link to the discussion where consensus was clearly established.

Thecontentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process. Contentious topics sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first.Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve toprovide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects.
WikiProject iconArticles for creationicon
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) ofWikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit theproject page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Note icon
This article was accepted fromthis draft on 10 July 2016 by reviewerDaniel kenneth (talk ·contribs).
WikiProject iconConservatismLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofconservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEducationLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofeducation andeducation-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHigher education
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofhigher education,universities, andcolleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join thediscussion, and see the project'sarticle guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education
WikiProject iconOrganizationsLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofOrganizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics:AmericanLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpolitics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byAmerican politics task force (assessed asLow-importance).
WikiProject iconUnited KingdomLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theUnited Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited StatesLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAbortionLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofAbortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Semi-protected edit request on 4 December 2025

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

Please change the text in the “AmericaFest” subsection of the “Annual Summits” section as follows.

After the sentence ending with "Riley Gaines, and Cenk Uygur.[88][20][89]" add the following sentence:

"The 2024 program featured policy discussions, youth-oriented sessions, and media panels. Exhibitors included student organizations, policy groups, and several higher-education institutions; Northwood University participated with an informational booth as part of the 2024 exhibitor expo.[citation needed]"

No other text should be altered.Numarketcomms (talk)14:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple sources:https://www.tpaction.com/agendahttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/northwood-university_northwood-students-had-an-unforgettable-time-activity-7276597685309083648-XZLc?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAACdak5gBdpCTCrNLOLsATeJr5fZrIK9ppx0https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6FUnX7SLuINumarketcomms (talk)14:39, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thank you :)Numarketcomms (talk)14:40, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done -- the proposed sources do not meetWP:RS, in particularWP:SECONDARY.Nomoskedasticity (talk)14:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Any sources u think work best for it is awesome! Sorry, for the proposed sources. If u need a proposed one with the rules, this is also what I had in mind:https://www.abc12.com/news/free-speech-security-concerns-for-mid-michigan-universities-following-kirk-shooting/article_3f138e7f-6fc0-4eae-9ed9-ea0ea307f584.htmlNumarketcomms (talk)14:57, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
|answered=noNumarketcomms (talk)15:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: That source does not support your proposed addition. It only briefly mentions that Northwood University sent a delegation to AmericaFest without providing any other information about the event. It's also not clear to me how the participation of this particular university is relevant.Day Creature (talk)20:15, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding separate Amfest article

[edit]

(Message copied fromhere.)

The TPUSA article is too long for everything notable about it to be included, and Amfest is mentioned in multiple sources (not that this guarantees this deserves an article).

Examples:

NYT:https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/turning-points-americafest-ben-shapiro.html

MSN:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/watch-the-first-tpusa-amfest-since-charlie-kirks-assassination/ar-AA1SD1XI

AP News:https://apnews.com/article/turning-point-convention-charlie-erika-kirk-f5e506321669034433ff1dac411ec2e3 statesThe feuds could ultimately define the boundaries of the Republican Party and determine the future of President Donald Trump’s fractious coalition, which appears primed for more schisms in the months and years ahead.

Tens of thousands of people attended the event, which I'm pretty sure makes it one of the biggest conservative coalitions in the US. Does it deserve its own article?Wikieditor662 (talk)03:40, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think if there is enough content to write about it, it would be a great stand alone article. Happy to help with edits!🥑GUACPOCALYPSE🥑16:46, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

New AmericaFest article

[edit]

Hey everyone, just letting you know I've very recently created theAmericaFest article. You're all welcome to contribute if you'd like. And thank you @Guacpocalypse for approving of creating the article.Wikieditor662 (talk)05:01, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the new article! I hope I can provide some value to it and help with the expansion of content, but in my brief review it's off to a good start. Hopefully more seasoned editors will also take part in it.🥑GUACPOCALYPSE🥑20:04, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your help! And I'm glad you like the direction it's going in so far.Wikieditor662 (talk)21:30, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Super Bowl section needs to mentionKid Rock’s lyrics

[edit]

""Young ladies, young ladies, I like 'em underage see, Some say that's statutory (But I say it's mandatory)". We can probably just copy over the relevant section.Doug Wellertalk19:56, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Those lyrics were not in the halftime show. --Spiffy sperry (talk)21:41, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
See my new addition. He was at the halftime show meant in part to be a Christian response imho, he wrote the lyrics.Doug Wellertalk11:15, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think the new attention to his lyrics might also be worth adding toAll-American Halftime Show. However, according to the playlist at that page, the song with those lyrics was apparently not performed at the event. Given that there are multiple well-sourced criticisms of Kid Rock and of the show, I think this may raiseWP:DUE concerns, and at the least it ought to be clarified that the song was not sung there. --Tryptofish (talk)00:13, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it should be made clear it wasn't sung there. I don't have much energy at the moment but may add a revised version to the AAHS article. Thanks for your comments.Doug Wellertalk10:06, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Going to have to side with @Spiffy sperry's logic, I think this belongs over on Kid Rock's article for sure, maybe evenOsmosis Jones' article but definitely not TPUSA's article maybe and thats a big maybe it should be mentioned on the All-American halftime show article. Why would we start setting precedence to include contentious lyrics from performing artists songs not sung at relevant article events? Lets remove it from TPUSA article and move it over to AAHS and go from there.MaximusEditor (talk)14:33, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Turning_Point_USA&oldid=1337798942"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp