Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:The WB 100+ Station Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconTelevision:StationsLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles abouttelevision programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you canjoin the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to thestyle guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe Television stations task force (assessed asLow-importance).
WikiProject iconMediaLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofMedia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject Media To-do List:

Are any of these "fictional" call letters used by real stations, or have they been reserved?Morwen -Talk22:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The FCC has no recognition of these fictitious call signs. Sometimes, they do get assigned to real stations (e.g.KWBT is inTulsa, Oklahoma, but there is a WB100+ channel KWBT inEureka, California). These call signs are made up by the channel owners purely for marketing purposes. Though I'm sure that in most cases they probably try to avoid conflicting with real call signs.DHowell05:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Future of The WB 100+

[edit]

Update:[1] What I find most interesting is the apparent omission of Savannah in the CW's plans.67.150.93.8021:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another update:[2] This claims that "none of the Pappas deals involve CW Plus," but that supposedly includes KWBL and KWUB. Clarification?Morgan Wick06:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WRWB

[edit]

I removed WRWB, which had been added by an anon a while ago. I have done my own research and, contrary to the anon's claims, WRWB doesn't appear to show the WB 100+ schedule. Between the Daytime WB and WB Primetime, or from 5 to 8 PM, WRWB shows hour-long blocks ofThe King of Queens,Will and Grace, andSex and the City in that order. By contrast, WFWB, which is most definitely part of the WB 100+, shows theBernie Mac Show,Yes Dear, and The King of Queens. Will and Grace and Sex and the City air after primetime. The equivalent 10 PM-midnight time on WRWB is taken up byThat 70's Show andSouth Park. Neither one of those shows airs regularly on weekdays on WFWB. In my view, if it shows the WB 100+ schedule it's WB 100+, if it doesn't it's not; thus there is no "controversy" whether it is or not.Morgan Wick22:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Finding Station Logos

[edit]

Since most of the WB 100+ Plus stations do not have websites (besides the sharedwww.thewbpass.com), it is hard trying to find the station logos. However, this may get easier because of a recent discovery of a website that provides these logos. The website web address:http://www.thewbpass.com/wbpass/ns04/images/siblogos2005/****.gif displays them. To find a certain logo, enter the call letters (all in lower case) of the station where the four stars "****", are located in the web address. As some stations have been announced as becoming CW Plus affiliates, their new CW logos, if they have them, cannot be found using this WB Pass logo website.— Precedingunsigned comment added byGrejlen (talkcontribs)01:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kowh.png

[edit]

Image:Kowh.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot05:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_WB_100%2B_Station_Group&oldid=1322534800"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp