Talk:The Princeton Tory
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article was nominated fordeletion on 11 December 2012 (UTC). The result ofthe discussion wasspeedy keep. |
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Malkiel Incident was a one time event posted on the Magazine's website without authorization by the editors or publisher. It should not be the highlight of a three sentence article.
Items should not be censored from Wikipedia on account of their being "one time" events. It was written about in the campus newspaper, so it was obviously newsworthy.Joamiq (talk)18:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Previously, the article read as follows:
ThePrinceton Tory is a student-run conservative publication atPrinceton University. The Tory was founded in 1984.[1] While the Tory is Princeton's primary source of conservative intellectual discourse, it is known to create campus controversy[2] and its writers have come under fire for reporting inaccuracies[3].
References
[edit]
This article is a stub. It barely touches upon the purpose of the magazine, its history, its successes, or its mistakes. By adding a reference to a singular incident that could potentially defame the publication's reputation without adding any other information about the magazine, we are not being true to Wikipedia's goal of objectivity. When this article is longer and more complete, the reference to the Malkiel blunder should be mentioned. Writing about it now is irresponsible.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)05:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)07:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This student newspaper is/was a controversial medium at Princeton. Its contrary position to campus culture makes it notable, as do the people associated with it. It clearly attracted students of a certain stripe and had an influence on their development. I say remove the tag. --Melchior2006 (talk)17:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
