Talk:The Planetary Society
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I could not cite it due to YouTube being on a blacklist, but Bill Nye says in a recent video that there are 60,000 members. I changed the page from 50,000 to 60,000. At 5 minutes and 13 seconds in the video "Bill and Ed's Excellent Conversation" on the Planetary Society YouTube Channel.— Precedingunsigned comment added byCaptainBrant (talk •contribs)23:29, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There should probably be a mention ofPlanetary Radio but I'm not sure which section would be best.Eluchil40413:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps the list of notable members could list former members, like the late Paul Newman. -Deep Atlantic Blue (talk)21:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The lede says "more than forty thousand international members".The section onThe Planetary Report says, "This magazine reaches over 100,000 members".It seems there are subscribers who are not members, but this distinction is not made in the text. -Ac44ck (talk)19:58, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I see that this link now goes to an apparent shopping (?) site in what appears to be japanese. Could someone with more context confirm this should no longer be listed, and remove it?— Precedingunsigned comment added by8.20.114.10 (talk)01:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone add the logo for The Planetary Society? --65.94.43.89 (talk)07:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onThe Planetary Society. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)10:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onThe Planetary Society. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)01:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
According tothis article theAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science dates the photo of the Society's founders to 1970, and not 1980 as stated in the current caption.JezGrove (talk)21:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the planetary society is engaged in lobbying efforts in support of NASA.
This makes their efforts somewhat contentious for the astrophysics community, because things like manned flights eat up massive amounts of money while astronomers and astrophysicists get scraps. Astrophysicists do not engage in pissing matches, and so they see their funding periodically pared down to support things that are little more than pseudo-scientific flag-waving exhibitions. For every billion dollars earmarked for manned flight, there are a dozen scientifically important programs shelved.2600:1700:6AE5:2510:0:0:0:24 (talk)00:56, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
