Talk:Terrafugia
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theTerrafugia article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Skepticism/Optimism sections taken together seem a valid neutral balance.—Precedingunsigned comment added by75.79.14.161 (talk)18:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article seems to be sourced by an excess of primary sources and not very manysecondary sources. Over time, I think we should be looking to source more of the claims from secondary articles about this technology, which may help keep the articlebalanced.
This article would be much improved if a photo were to be added.N2e (talk)19:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 | It is requested that aphotograph beincluded in this article toimprove its quality.Wikipedians in Massachusetts may be able to help! The external toolWordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images onFlickr and other web sites. | Upload |
Terrafugia announced on 6 May 2013 feasibility studies on a "future personal aircraft",vertical takeoff and landing, called the TF-X.
Cheers.N2e (talk)04:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links onTerrafugia. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)05:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thisedit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I would like the following content to be added after the sentence "In 2017 the first delivery of the Transition was forecast for 2019, but this deadline was not met, and by 2020 none had yet been delivered.[3]"
In January 2021, Terrafugia announced that a Transition vehicle had received an airworthiness certificate, that the vehicle that received the certificate is legal for flight, and that the vehicle represents the initial version of the Transition roadable aircraft. Terrafugia noted they will produce and sell additional initial (flight-only) versions to interested parties and is aiming to have the Transition be legal both in the sky and on local roads in 2022.
This page is out of date in many ways, and it would be nice to update it with some facts. I am an employee, so I do not want to try to do too much; I definitely respect the conflict-of-interest guidelines and protections. But the fact that we now have a product that is eligible be sold to the public seems like a reasonable update to include. I do not see this as a promotion of the company in the sense of trying to boost sales; my intent was more to demonstrate that Terrafugia is an ongoing concern.
I am not paid to alter Wikipedia. The proposed language does come from a press release, but it is factual and IMHO does not seem very different from the preceding sentence. Maybe someone could edit it to make it more neutral somehow? Or perhaps it is better placed down in the Transition section?
Thanks for considering!Gtlev43 (talk)01:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
