This article iswritten inIndian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,travelled,centre,analysed,defence) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus.

	Tamils is aformer featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, checkthe nomination archive) and why it was removed.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page asToday's featured article on September 24, 2005.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 25, 2005 Featured article candidate Promoted January 7, 2007 Featured article review Kept December 29, 2015 Featured article review Demoted
Current status:Former featured article

This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects.

India:Tamil Nadu /Classical TamilHigh‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage ofIndia-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit theproject page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia High This article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported byWikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed asTop-importance). This article is supported byWikiProject Classical Tamil (assessed asTop-importance). This article is aselected article on theIndia portal, which means that it wasselected as a high quality India-related article. This article was last assessed in February 2019. Ethnic groupsHigh‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating toethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups High This article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale. WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: Here are some openWikiProject Ethnic groups tasks: Meta-tasks: Place the{{Ethnic groups}} templateon the talk page of articles within the scope of this project. Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution: Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention Iyer Peruvian people Start an article: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests Feel free toedit this list ordiscuss these tasks. Sri LankaHigh‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofSri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka High This article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates tothe region ofSouth Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

Archives

Index1,2,3

This page has archives. Sections older than30 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3.

We cite K. Indrapala'sEvolution of an Ethnic Identity. Da Silva absolutely roasted that work in a long review, and even Indrapala admitted he had completely changed his mind in the years since he originally studied the subject for his PhD. The intervening period saw the rise of Tamil nationalism & Da Silva suggests this accounts for Indrapala's change of heart.

JSTOR 43855217 is the review. I am not for now suggesting we don't use it as a source but it does look like we may need to take care. I have seen a couple of other, lesser reviews that are pretty dismissive, too. -Sitush (talk)22:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Da Silva is not a historian but a diplomat, and is an unreliable, heavily biased source. He even makes a crazy claim that the Koneswaram Kovil, which we have huge evidence for in inscriptions and literature, was actually a Buddhist temple. Really his words can not be taken seriously. Certainly not above Indrapala.Metta79 (talk)19:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-read Bandu De Silva 'roasting', Its frankly embarrassing. He is denying the clear overwhelming evidence of a early iron age Dravidian substratum in Sri Lanka, which recent unbiased Sinhalese scholars such as Sudharshan Seneviratne have uncovered. A good summary of those findings can be found here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBV9xNQDA8w

Indrapala merely reiterated these findings in his new book. Unfortunately, Sri Lankan Archaeology and History departments are heavily biased, so all evidence of prior Dravidian habitation on the island is being erased from the history books.Metta79 (talk)20:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea about de Silva's expertise but his paper is recent and published in a reliable, peer-reviewed academic journal & so cannot reasonably be ignored. Nor can we ignore Indrapala's change of heart, if indeed it is a change of heart. We don't usually get to pick and choose in these circumstances. -Sitush (talk)11:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Sri Lankan branch of RAS is no longer reliable and has poor peer review. It is run by Sinhalese anti-Tamil racists (I am not going to mince my words). Unfortunately, it brings disrepute to the RAS brand.Metta79 (talk)12:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, it may need to be discussed atWP:RSN. Do you have any actual evidence of this, & I mean from independent sources. Academics should have picked up on it. (Please can you try to get your indents right? This is the 3rd time I have had to fix them here and it is a pain on mobile.) -Sitush (talk)15:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well when the last two presidents of the organisation (a married couple) make incendiary statements like this, to expect neutrality from them is laughable:

https://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=28217

http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/Royal-Asiatic-Society-Sri-Lanka-needs-women-and-diversity-153808.html

“They [Mr. and Mrs. Goonatilake] were not interested in making the [RASSL] journal academic. Their political interests were put into the journal. Most of the writers were chosen from their inner circle,” Professor Paranavithana tells me. I ask him about his forced exit from the RASSL allegedly over his treacherous willingness to commemorate Portuguese imperialism in SL in the early 16th century."  

“They argued that the Portuguese have done wrong things, so they shouldn’t be commemorated. Meanwhile, I got the permission from the council and went to Paris to speak in that conference [to commemorate the 500-year anniversary of Portuguese advent in Sri Lanka]. It was organized by the Gulbenkian Foundation. While I was away, Susantha started writing that I am a traitor, I am participating in these people’s conferences, etc. He circulated letters.”  

Most of the journals from south asia are substandard unfortunately and in many cases overtly politicised.Metta79 (talk)19:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed your indents again. You haven't really addressed the problem, as neither tamilnet nor Darshanie Ratnawalli are independent of the Tamil community. I don't know who was on the journal's peer review board at the time of the de Silva paper being approved but I see absolutely no problem with a husband and wife having common involvement - the Bayleys might be another example of such. Note: I am not saying you are wrong, merely that there are a lot of aspersions cast in this troubled area & it would be good to have independent support for your statement that the RASSL journal should not be considered reliable from some unspecified date.Sitush (talk)21:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Darshanie Ratnawalli is aSINHALESE.Metta79 (talk)21:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed your indentsyet again. You haven't got them right once here.

Ratnawalli is right in the middle of the Tamil/Sinhalese situation - it really needs someone from outside of it - the same applies with academic credibility disputes that involve, say, Jewish Zionists and those Jews who are opposed to it. -Sitush (talk)12:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] - a 2012 source. "TTo our knowledge, there is no scientific review of Minahan's work which evaluates the reliability and validity of the information Minahan presents in his articles. Although Francis Fukuyama (1996) published a very short review of Minahan's early edition of his encyclopedia, it does not give much information about the reliability of the book. Many scholars writing on nationalism started referring to this encyclopedia as a primary source, yet these studies do not provide an evaluation of the work as well...We do not claim the comprehensiveness of the database we compiled. On the contrary we realize that there are many factual errors and inconsistencies in Minahan's encyclopedia. Furthermore based on our reliability analysis, we were not able to validate the information regarding some of these "stateless nations". Of course absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, yet for our purposes we did not add the stateless nations we could not validate into our analysis. However we believe that this encyclopedia can be utilized for a macro-analysis which attempts to understand the differences among diverse nationalist movements from all over the world."Doug Weller (talk •contribs)17:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Presently scholars identify this as a Brahmi inscription and not a Tamil Brahmi Inscription. Read the articleTissamaharama inscription No. 53. Sources:
(1) Falk, H. (2014). Owners’ Graffiti on Pottery from Tissamaharama. Zeitschrift für Archäologie Aussereuropäischer Kulturen. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag. pp.45-94
(2) Dias, M. (2021). The South Indian ascendancy depicted in the Tamil inscriptions in Sri Lanka from the 3rd century BCE to 12th century ACE. Ancient Ceylon. No.27. pp.43-58. --L Manju (talk)17:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No not all presently scholars identify this as brahmi inscription. Some identify this as Tamil Brahmi inscription. You first read the article you mentioned, out of 5 scholars, 3 identify it as Tamil brahmi. So your statement is not correct that presently scholars identify this as brahmi not Tamil brahmi.Ranithraj (talk)06:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia articles that use Indian English
• Wikipedia former featured articles
• Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
• Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
• B-Class India articles
• High-importance India articles
• B-Class India articles of High-importance
• B-Class Tamil Nadu articles
• Top-importance Tamil Nadu articles
• B-Class Tamil Nadu articles of Top-importance
• WikiProject Tamil Nadu articles
• B-Class Classical Tamil articles
• Top-importance Classical Tamil articles
• B-Class Classical Tamil articles of Top-importance
• India portal selected articles
• WikiProject India articles
• B-Class Ethnic groups articles
• High-importance Ethnic groups articles
• WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
• B-Class Sri Lanka articles
• High-importance Sri Lanka articles
• WikiProject Sri Lanka articles

• Wikipedia pages about contentious topics