Talk:Social constructionism
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theSocial constructionism article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives:1,2Auto-archiving period:12 months  |
 | This article iswritten inBritish English withOxford spelling (colour,realize,organization,analyse; note that-ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
 | This level-5 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between18 August 2025 and10 December 2025. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):Nateiac7 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated byJulia.kennedy2004 (talk)00:33, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section could really use a proofreading pass. There's quite a few grammar errors, especially in the first paragraph. "Martin talks about intersectionality and how the term was created to gender is a social construction that is influenced by social factors and experiences." I'm not sure how to correct this sentence as I suspect that words may be missing. The flow and readability of the section is maybe subjective, but in my opinion it isn't up to the standard of the rest of the article. I don't want to unilaterally rewrite the whole section, at least not without a round of drafting and feedback.~2026-19084-3 (talk)20:51, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
