Talk:Silkwood
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theSilkwood article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Tip: Anchors arecase-sensitive in most browsers. This article containsbroken links to one or more targetanchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking thepage history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed |Report an error |
Isnt there a remake of this?173.230.166.134 (talk)16:01, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One way to improve film articles of this type is to avoid using promotional phrases like "the true story of", which instantly destroy neutrality and only mimic advertising copy for the product.24.90.17.13404:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Silkwood imp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk)13:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article immediately ruins the story for anybody who has not heard it. Does anybody object to a spoiler warning?
It's a real story about a real woman who lost her life in a real cause. If you were watching a WW2 movie, would you consider it a spoiler if someone whispered in your ear -- "Psst -- the Germans lost!"?Cross Reference (talk)04:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Karen Silkwood was an actual person.
83.45.35.118 (talk)14:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How about Silkwood's dead?
Fer48 (talk)13:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a BluRay version of this movie?88.1.10.77 (talk)14:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What's the deal with the depiction of thousands of cigarettes lighting up in the movie? Maybe not literally thousands, but I think in every other scene there is a cigarette involved. You almost get lung cancer just from watching it! Even if it would have added to the plot (it didn't), it's too excessive. After the sixth on-screen cigarette you understand they are smoking like hell, no need to light up another dozen in front of the camera. Geez!— Precedingunsigned comment added by217.189.222.143 (talk)13:30, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The plot summary of this movie does not follow the narrative structure of the movie in any way. It does not follow characters, timelines, or really any sort of gist of the movie at all. It can better be described as a lengthened synopsis, which is subpar to plot summaries regularly found on Wikipedia.70.164.36.143 (talk)03:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
